elbows
Well-Known Member
I think you will find that the people of Gaza elected Hamas.
Liar?
It was not a Gaza-only election and Hamas ended up in full control of Gaza in particular because of later events and a short civil war/armed power struggle.
And the election was in 2006, which means.....
Reader added context to that sort of twitter thread, which sadly did not show up automatically when I linked to the tweet, says:
No elections have occurred in Gaza since 2006, 17 years ago.
As of 2021, 64.2% of Gaza are 25 years old or younger. You require to be 18 years old to vote, meaning you have to be at least 35 years old to have voted in the previous Gaza election.
Also even if you'd prefer to think of the population as being unchanged and frozen in time since way back then, the reasons for people voting that way were also complex at the time. I'm not going to claim that polling carried out after the election was a perfect guide to sentiments, but things such as the following still need to be factored in:
However, new polling following the election indicated that two-thirds of Palestinians believed Hamas should change its policy of rejecting Israel's right to exist. Most also supported a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Post-election polls indicated that Hamas' victory was due largely to Palestinians' desire to end corruption in government rather than support for the organization's political platform
From 2006 Palestinian legislative election - Wikipedia
It is reasonable to consider that it was at least in part a protest vote against the party that had previously dominated the scene, was rife with corruption, and subject to accusations of having become too complicit in upholding the status quo. The sort of thing considered understandable when it happens in modern democracies with normal electoral cycles, let alone to a people subject to decades of occupation, who hadnt even had the opportunity for that sort of election since 1996, and whose previous charismatic leader had died.
Last edited: