Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hamas/Israel conflict: news and discussion

Also reminded Ilan Pappe most well known book on 48 compares what happened in 48 to the ethnic cleansing in ex Yugoslavia in 90s. That with the development of international law what happened in 48 would be now considered a crime.

International law move on and develops over time.


What is happening now in Gaza is quite astounding effort by the hard right in government in Israel to outdo what there Zionist predecessors did in 48.

Theres no need to make crass comparisons to the Nazis.

Just read the history and comparisons can be made in different ways
 
Last edited:
The spotlight being on Gaza doesn't make mean that the IDF are committing "the worst civillian massacre in years" It does mean that it is a well publicised one
Well an estimated 40,000 dead Palestinians is really bad isn't it? And yes never before has this scale of inhumanity been publicly televised.
 
Well an estimated 40,000 dead Palestinians is really bad isn't it? And yes never before has this scale of inhumanity been publicly televised.


And nobody even knows how many have been murdered in Sudan.

More than 300,00 mudered in Syria.



And more being killed and tortured every month

30,000 a year murdered in Mexico
 
And nobody even knows how many have been murdered in Sudan.

More than 300,00 mudered in Syria.



And more being killed and tortured every month

30,000 a year murdered in Mexico

30,000 Palestinians killed really understates the scale of what is happened in Gaza because it is only including those killed directly by bombs and guns, and not including those who have died as an intended consequence of the constant displacement and evacuations combined with targeting of medical facilities and reservoirs as well as the blockade on food supplies and medical equipment. The actual death toll including deaths as a result of exposure, famine, disease, inadequate water and lack of medical facilities is likely closer to 200,000 and by the time this ends will certainly be higher than that.

I think it is disingenuous to draw a contrast with 30,000 killed in Mexican drug wars. The entire population of Gaza is displaced, it is not a remotely comparable situation to Mexico.
 
30,000 Palestinians killed really understates the scale of what is happened in Gaza because it is only including those killed directly by bombs and guns, and not including those who have died as an intended consequence of the constant displacement and evacuations combined with targeting of medical facilities and reservoirs as well as the blockade on food supplies and medical equipment. The actual death toll including deaths as a result of exposure, famine, disease, inadequate water and lack of medical facilities is likely closer to 200,000 and by the time this ends will certainly be higher than that.

I think it is disingenuous to draw a contrast with 30,000 killed in Mexican drug wars. The entire population of Gaza is displaced, it is not a remotely comparable situation to Mexico.

What's happening in Gaza including the ethnic/confessional cleansing is comparable to what is happening in Sudan and has happened in Syria. Syria is possibly the closer parallel, because of the similarity of the postcolonial regime that was put in place.


As to Mexico, I'm always shocked about how little attention the violence there garners when compared with that in the Middle East.
 
What's happening in Gaza including the ethnic/confessional cleansing is comparable to what is happening in Sudan and has happened in Syria. Syria is possibly the closer parallel, because of the similarity of the postcolonial regime that was put in place.


As to Mexico, I'm always shocked about how little attention the violence there garners when compared with that in the Middle East.
This is not a thread about Mexico.
 
And nobody even knows how many have been murdered in Sudan.

More than 300,00 mudered in Syria.



And more being killed and tortured every month

30,000 a year murdered in Mexico

All different and horrific situations with their own talking points. Does the UK supply any of those groups with weapons though?
 
All different and horrific situations with their own talking points. Does the UK supply any of those groups with weapons though?


Limited supply to Sudan, and a huge supply to the Saudis and Emiratis who have murdered tens of thousands of civillian deaths in Yemen.

 
Limited supply to Sudan, and a huge supply to the Saudis and Emiratis who have murdered tens of thousands of civillian deaths in Yemen.


I think most people on here against selling arms to Israel would also be against selling arms to Saudi Arabia. That's been well publicised & covered in the past.
 

Seems fair enough when barlimo is defending his use of an antisemitic trope like this
Now it's anti-semitic to criticize the IDF!

This the problem: a proper discussion about the Israeli actions before or during this war cannot be had because of the usual charge of anti-Semitism.
 
Last edited:
Seems fair enough when barlimo is defending his use of an antisemitic trope like this

Actually Tim was having a go at me in a not straightforward way.

So no its not fair enough.

And thanks but Id rather not be included in posts which start to make me seem part of the problem.

I've already done a recent post which says there are right and wrong ways to criticise Israel. Based on its history.

I've tried over this thread to read up on the subject and make best effort to distinguish between:

IDF/ present Israeli government/ Israel as a state and all Israelis as a whole

Jews as a whole and Zionism as a specific political project. To be clear I'm anti Zionist.

As I've done this all the only way that I can be got at is the whataboutery line of attack.
 
Last edited:
TBF I hold my head in my hands when I see the Israel equals Nazi line

Its quite common and TBF sometimes supporters of Palestinians and supporters of Israel outside Israel are as bad as each other.

On one hand Israel is like Nazi on other its all about Hamas/ Islam and sliding into tropes about backwards Muslims.

IMO Zionism is a , as historian Tony Judt argued, a product of 19c Nationalism. With all its plus points and minus points.

Zionist built a democratic state where the indigenous people were treated as a problem to be expelled or managed.

As Tony Judt argued the problem is that it is past its sell by date.

This kind of nationalism which is now even more entrenched in Israeli state is an anachronism in the modern age.

Israel is such a contradiction. A democratic state that still holds onto 19c views of nationalism. Plus still trying to colonise its mini Empire.

Why the British Jewish historian said he moved to believing in One State solution. For which like other Jews who say the same( Ilan Pappe ) he got a lot of flack.
 
Last edited:
Honestly if you can't describe what has been going on in Palestine for the past hundred plus years without using the words of bad things from other parts of the world then what is the point.
 
Now it's anti-semitic to criticize the IDF!

This the problem: a proper discussion about the Israeli actions before or during this war cannot be had because of the usual charge of anti-Semitism.
Who said that? Who has accused anyone here of antisemitism just for criticising the IDF. It would be a weird line for those of us who are critical of the IDF to take.
 
Just been watching Novara media coverage of the Tommy Robinson march in London. NM reporter did good job letting people talk.

One thing that was noticeable that is in certain quarters on far right in this country Islam as replaced the Jews as this force that is undermining society. Remarkable similar to classic anti semitism. But its modern version is directed at Muslims.

Some on march carried Israeli flags as sign of support. Israeli in their view is fighting Islam.

Makes me think that instead of going on about specific types of racism the thinking behind them is the same whether its directed at Jews or Muslims. Its that the target changes depending on he circumstances.

Both Islamophobia and anti semitism are linked in a world view that sees that these as intrusions into society undermining it from within.
 
Back
Top Bottom