Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hamas/Israel conflict: news and discussion

]
Yep, it's grotesque seeing what these terrorists have done and people defending them or even celebrating their actions. It's in their aims to wipe out all Jews, they're not defending anyone. They're trying to finish Hitlers work.

Do you think firing missiles into people's homes and killing them is not grotesque? The Hamas attack was a bloody piece of well planned theatre designed deliberately to shock and titillate an audience, just like 9/11, but the if your life is pointlessly cut short it makes no difference how you are murdered. It's still shit whether it was organised by impresarios or by drab grey men in a command centre.

As to the primary objectives, it's not religion or a desire to annihilate Jews that drives people to participate in suicidal attacks like this, it's desperation and anger against the vile conditions in which they and their families live. If you Allow People to live normal mundane lives, they get in with being boring.
 
Just watching aljazeera, the Israelis have shutdown movement in the West Bank. Not just border crossings but different sections of the occupied west bank being blocked from accessing each other.
 
The West Bank and Gaza Strip are shown as part of Israel on the map. Not even lip service to a two-state solution. Not that there can ever be a viable two-state solution. One state for both Jews and Palestinians is the only possible solution. On that narrow point, his map is kind of right.

skynews-assembly-benjamin-netanyahu_6294106.jpg
The State of Israel has no internationally recognised borders (contrary to what an Israeli official said on Radio 4 today). It has “ceasefire lines”, also known as “green lines”. (Permanent borders are “blue lines” on UN maps).

“Palestine” is not simply the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. It could be argued that showing Galilee as part of the State of Israel is just as illegitimate as showing the Gaza Strip and the West Bank as part of that state. (Galilee, which has a largely Palestinian Arab population, was under Israeli military rule until 1966).
 
Cheers for this.

Just tried to donate but they're asking for my name and address, which I'm not happy to give.

Well imagine being asked for your name and address when making a donation/buying something online. 🤷‍♂️ What do you think they're going to do with it that any other company doesn't?
 
The West Bank and Gaza Strip are shown as part of Israel on the map. Not even lip service to a two-state solution. Not that there can ever be a viable two-state solution. One state for both Jews and Palestinians is the only possible solution. On that narrow point, his map is kind of right.

skynews-assembly-benjamin-netanyahu_6294106.jpg
A single unitary state is one of those ideas that sounds so good, it's hard to imagine why they aren't rushing to implement. The problem is that the main raison d'etre for Israel's existence is that it is a Jewish state. A homeland for an ethnic/religous group that has some justification for viewing itself as one of the most persecuted in history. There are currently 9.5 million Israeli citizens of whom about 1.6 million are Arabs. 3 million Palestinians in the West Bank and 2 million in Gaza means that Arabs in a unified Israel would be roughly half the population and Israel's unique Jewish status would be lost in a couple of generations (the Palestinians have larger families) This also doesn't count the 2-2.5 million living in Jordan/Lebanon where they're still not citizens 75 years later. Just not happening I'm afraid.
 
Quite a sizeable "could" there, don't you think?
Why is it that the absorption of Galilee into the State of Israel regarded as legitimate, but the annexation of parts of the West Bank by that State are not?
 
Not intentionally wanting to add to confusion/ conspiracy stuff but did anyone read /see anything /understand about Netanyahu going to the U. N with a new map of Israel that allegedly didn’t display Palestine ?
Was well reported. He had a right sneery grin when he presented it.
 
A single unitary state is one of those ideas that sounds so good, it's hard to imagine why they aren't rushing to implement. The problem is that the main raison d'etre for Israel's existence is that it is a Jewish state. A homeland for an ethnic/religous group that has some justification for viewing itself as one of the most persecuted in history. There are currently 9.5 million Israeli citizens of whom about 1.6 million are Arabs. 3 million Palestinians in the West Bank and 2 million in Gaza means that Arabs in a unified Israel would be roughly half the population and Israel's unique Jewish status would be lost in a couple of generations (the Palestinians have larger families) This also doesn't count the 2-2.5 million living in Jordan/Lebanon where they're still not citizens 75 years later. Just not happening I'm afraid.
You have two groups of people claiming the same land. The only solution is for them to share it. That of course would involve compromise on both sides - Palestinians in many cases having to give up on claims to land stolen from their ancestors, Jewish Israelis having to recognise that their state cannot be purely a Jewish state.

I'm not saying there will be a solution any time soon, but when solutions to these kinds of problems do come, they tend not to have been easily foreseeable. It will probably need changes elsewhere as well. The fall of the Islamist regime in Iran would help.
 
Most don't require it.

Usually if you decline to give your name and address, it just excludes Gift Aid.

That doesn't seem to be an option with MAP.

Gift Aid is a good thing though. :thumbs: I don't think Suella is going to come bust in your door for showing a little support and kindness to the Palestinians - not at this moment, anyway.
 
QUOTE="PTK, post: 18344605, member: 80330"]
The State of Israel has no internationally recognised borders (contrary to what an Israeli official said on Radio 4 today). It has “ceasefire lines”, also known as “green lines”. (Permanent borders are “blue lines” on UN maps).

“Palestine” is not simply the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. It could be argued that showing Galilee as part of the State of Israel is just as illegitimate as showing the Gaza Strip and the West Bank as part of that state. (Galilee, which has a largely Palestinian Arab population, was under Israeli military rule until 1966).
[/QUOTE]

It's all Palestine, isn't it? With perhaps the exception of the Golan Heights. However, Palestinians with Israeli citizenship, at least the ones that I've met, including those from Galilee, show no desire to lose the advantages that being Israelis gives them, which is not surprising seeing how shit the alternative is.

Avigdor Lieberman, who is on the Israeli far-Right and was very influential, has proposed ceding areas within the 1967 frontiers with majority Arab populations to the Palestinian Authority and stripping the inhabitants of Israeli citizenship. This is not an idea that those inhabitants have welcomed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PTK
I don't meant o be flippant, but how is flattening gaza going to help rescue anyone? They'll be killed!

not about rescuing people anymore if the mood of that thread has passed you by for someone people it now an eye for an eye


go look at the mail using a peaceful Israel women death as justification for bloodshed

welcome.to 2023
 
I don't meant o be flippant, but how is flattening gaza going to help rescue anyone? They'll be killed!
It won't the Israelis will negotiate their release offering some kind of exchange of prisoners. It's what they always do in hostage situations. Bit doing so now would make the current government even more unpopular than it already is.
 
Back
Top Bottom