cupid_stunt
Chief seagull hater & farmerbarleymow's nemesis.
Probably by satellite phone.Can someone tell me how Al Jazeera reporters are still able to broadcast with no internet etc
Probably by satellite phone.Can someone tell me how Al Jazeera reporters are still able to broadcast with no internet etc
Ah okProbably by satellite phone.
Quite likely they'll have their own generator and satellite feed. Plus if there's any signal access at all it'll be in the interests of whatever passes for the Gaza leadership right now to prioritise keeping them up and running.Can someone tell me how Al Jazeera reporters are still able to broadcast with no internet etc
Can someone tell me how Al Jazeera reporters are still able to broadcast with no internet etc
Satellite?Can someone tell me how Al Jazeera reporters are still able to broadcast with no internet etc
There are no broadcasters (the ones I've seen are in Jerusalem) just pictures. And that's quite the bombardment going on.
Ok thanks for all responsesAl Jazeera has just had a reporter from Gaza on, but only by phone, no pictures, that's why I suspect he has a satellite phone.
About 40%of the way through we are told that this is 'big boy politics' by some bloke from Labour Friends ofWar CrimesIsrael, whilst on the right hand screen we get clips of Jeremy Corbyn
Palestine Red Crescent:
We have completely lost contact with the operations room in Gaza Strip and all our teams operating there due to the Israeli authorities cutting off all landline, cellular and internet communications. We are deeply concerned about the ability of our teams to continue…
The politics are harder than the aid effort needed here. Aid agencies are very good at getting a camp up and running at scale but yeah none going to happen….I think because it's so wildly improbable that Netanyahu would even contemplate it... Forget whether it's been mentioned in the thread, or might have been Harari mentioned it in the podcast you posted way back, but remember it coming up somewhere. It would also require a colossal aid effort (I mean not that the current situation doesn't, but it's a lot easier for those in power to ignore when they can deny responsibility). And issues of trust etc.
I think it's easy to look at this small spot on a map and say 'well, why can't they just...'. We're talking about safe accommodation for the population of Birmingham (the city itself + a bit of metro). Also a deeply traumatised population... It justifies an effort on that level (though whether that specific plan would be appropriate seems.. debatable). But it's not going to happen.
Satellite connections, you can set them up with not too much kit.Can someone tell me how Al Jazeera reporters are still able to broadcast with no internet etc
Agreed, he has been far more interesting to listen to than a lot of the highly tribal commentators…Much more nuanced than I expected. Very interesting interview. We need more of this progressive thinking.
Oh right okSatellite connections, you can set them up with not too much kit.
Wonder what that means in light of what looks like the start of the ground invasion proper?Al Jazeera are reporting that Qatar mediated cease fire talks are at an "advanced stage".
Indeed, we should probably be more nuanced with language, instead of talking about Israeli’s speak about specifically what part of that country we mean…For those posters who feel all the Israeli government are doing is to carry out the wishes of the electorate
View attachment 397289
I'm doing the foreign pages layout today, I'm generally pretty hard to shake with war pics as I've been doing this a long time but the picture wire for Gaza is some of the worst I've seen. There's one kid in hospital. Actually crying a bit. Fuck.
Yes this comms blackout likely essential part of IDF gameplanSo soon it will be the equivalent of being able to take someone into a private room and pummel the shit out of them where no-one else can see.
View attachment 397288
Well, that was truly bizarre.
Very limited now too.Al Jazeera still has reporters in Khan Younis. Satellite link by the looks of it.
The latest:UN resolution calling for a ceasefire and resumption of aid has been approved, for what little that's worth. Being reported alongside long-range footage of bombs slamming into Gaza City.
UN resolution calling for a ceasefire and resumption of aid has been approved, for what little that's worth. Being reported alongside long-range footage of bombs slamming into Gaza City.
Its saying a humanitarian truce on Al Jazeera, assuming that amounts to roughly the same thing, though maybe less binding?UN resolution calling for a ceasefire and resumption of aid has been approved, for what little that's worth. Being reported alongside long-range footage of bombs slamming into Gaza City.
It's quite simple for me now. Any politician not at the very least calling for an immediate ceasefire can fuck the fuck off.
Most of the EU wankers abstained as did Ukraine - maybe they were thinking we should just send Palestinians lots of money.US voted against. France in favour. UK abstained.
Gilad Erdan, Ambassador of Israel to the UN, said in response to the resolution passing that “today is a day that will go down in infamy”.
“We have all witnessed that the UN holds not even one ounce of legitimacy,” he said. “The UN is committed to ensuring further atrocity. According to the family of nations, Israel has no right to defend itself.”
There are no talks or discussions to be held with Hamas, he said, adding that Israel will not sit idly by to let them commit atrocities again. The resolution does not mention Hamas once, as if the war started on its own.
“What is going on here?” he asked, questioning whether the goal was to tie Israel’s hands. “The only way to destroy Hamas is to root them out. Why are you not holding Hamas accountable?”
“We know there is no humanitarian crisis in accordance with international humanitarian law,” he said, noting that every statistic comes from Hamas about information about Gaza.
Anyone interested in preventing violence should call on Hamas to lay down their arms, turn themselves in and return all hostages, he said.
“If this were to happen, the war would end immediately,” he said. “This is a dark day for the UN and mankind. Israel will defend itself and will do what must be done to eradicate Hamas’ capabilities and bring the hostages home.”
None of it is binding I' m afraid, it's only the security council resolutions that are bindingIts saying a humanitarian truce on Al Jazeera, assuming that amounts to roughly the same thing, though maybe less binding?
Most of the EU wankers abstained as did Ukraine - maybe they were thinking we should just send Palestinians lots of money.