Just to check my facts here, are Palestinian babies civilians?But there is a divide right? Even if some civilians might have some sort of quasi-military role? Babies are still civilians, right?
If there‘s still a divide you’re really just arguing about numbers, rather than the very concept of the civilian in Israeli society.
I remember this when it was all fields of…Dissensus…You urbanites sure are a contentious people.
Just to check my facts here, are Palestinian babies civilians?
Just to check my facts here, are Palestinian babies civilians?
Blimey, you’ve changed your tune.All Palestinians are civilians who have been forced to do unspeakable things by the Israelis, so they're alright.
All Israelis are murderers.
I’m sorry, what?All Palestinians are civilians who have been forced to do unspeakable things by the Israelis, so they're alright.
All Israelis are murderers.
So the killing of thousands of Palestinian kids is as awful as the killing of Israeli kids by Hamas. At last we're getting somewhere.Of course.
Although you'd better ask Pickman's that, as he seems to think in some societies where there is militarisation, it's complicated. If he thinks the "civilian distinction is being promoted by the zionists and their allies as part of their propaganda" in Israel I'd assume he thinks that such a distinction is also being propagandised by Hamas and friends.
You are firmly downYou’re a fucking atrocity denying cunt. Fuck you.
I do sympathise with both sides, of course. I've described the attacks of 7th October as hideous. And whatever the blurred line between settlers and military, I don't regard the people who were murdered as legitimate targets. At all.I supposed you might have thought more broadly about the Jewish experience from then right up to 1945, and then considered how that has shaped the current situation and mindset of many of the Jews alive today in Israel. But no, keep your cut-off at 1948 and make sure you try not sympathise with both sides, I'm sure that will help you "think about some way out of this fucked up situation".
If that was an attempt at summarising my point of view then it failed abysmally, as you would see if you bothered to read my posts, and inwardly digest. Of course, if it was just a throw away irrelevant remark then we can all ignore it.All Palestinians are civilians who have been forced to do unspeakable things by the Israelis, so they're alright.
All Israelis are murderers.
So the killing of thousands of Palestinian kids is as awful as the killing of Israeli kids by Hamas. At last we're getting somewhere.
Both sides in conflict propagandise stuff.No we’re not getting anywhere, we’re back dead children bingo again. Anything to avoid addressing claims that civilian status in Israel is being propagandised I guess.
I do sympathise with both sides, of course. I've described the attacks of 7th October as hideous. And whatever the blurred line between settlers and military, I don't regard the people who were murdered as legitimate targets. At all.
Was the foundation of the state of Israel a random choice of date by me? No, I don't think so. The expulsion of the Palestinians and everything that has followed created a concrete reality, one that exists to this day. The mindset of Jewish people and the state of Israel and the experiences of the Holocaust are obvious and central, of course. But does a 'mindset' excuse decades of death and control? There are multiple wrongs and narratives in this conflict, but the one imposed on the Palestinians for the last 80 years is a cause of untold misery and a denial of the most basic components of a decent life.
You know perfectly well he's not referring to babies when he's saying it's complicated, he was making a reasonable point that there are greyer areas where it comes to Israeli society than we'd think of when it comes to UK civilians because of conscription and paramilitarism on the borders. You can disagree with that, or suggest the converse that the existence of grey areas is being used as a shield against criticism of civilian killings, but you can do so without this fucking stupid "he thinks babies are soldiers" shite.Of course.
Although you'd better ask Pickman's that, as he seems to think in some societies where there is militarisation, it's complicated. If he thinks the "civilian distinction is being promoted by the zionists and their allies as part of their propaganda" in Israel I'd assume he thinks that such a distinction is also being propagandised by Hamas and friends.
I'd go with 'horrible inevitability' rather than justified. I'd say context rather than excuse. I'd say Palestinians have the right to fight back and I'd hope - sat here in the West - that was aimed at military targets, but then that's not always going to happen is it? Sometimes fucked up situations produce (hideous) fucked up responses. Which, I don't excuse. It's a situation of absolute rights and wrongs - the attacks of the 7th October and the rockets falling on Gaza and the rest are absolutely wrong. But then it's not reducible to those rights and wrongs, it's not a situation where right is likely to prevail because it's set in a long history of wrongs. And whilst you can reset all that history and context back to any significant moment in time, the expulsion of the Palestinians is the absolute foreground, the reality, the thing that has fucked up the lives of the Palestinians.Referring back to your original post, it seems you still think one side in this current event has an excuse for their actions, i.e. a “but”, and the other side doesn’t. So contrary to the typical western government view that Israel has the moral high ground because it is defending itself, your position doesn’t fall in between but takes the opposing view that Hamas‘s actions have the moral high ground due to past oppressions?
For calling out atrocity deniers and Hamas defenders? Proud to be there if that’s what you see it as.You are firmly down
In the dirt yourself.
yeh in some societies it is more complex than is the position here. where israel conscripts almost all groups in comparison to the all-volunteer force of the uk or us, and demands former conscripts remain on the reserve list, there is a blurring between the civilian and the military. for me, many of the deaths in israel a couple of weeks back were more akin to the deaths of off-duty udr soldiers in the six counties rather than the killings of civilians. the way in which the israeli government has now distributed weapons to a great number of their population blurs matters further. it's not 'everyone who isn't in the army is a civilian', as it is here. there are armed 'civilian security squads' or the civil guard - Israel arms civilian security squads, fearing internal strife. are they civilians? not armed by the government they're not imo. but hey if you want to actually discuss it then have at it.Of course.
Although you'd better ask Pickman's that, as he seems to think in some societies where there is militarisation, it's complicated. If he thinks the "civilian distinction is being promoted by the zionists and their allies as part of their propaganda" in Israel I'd assume he thinks that such a distinction is also being propagandised by Hamas and friends.
yeh in some societies it is more complex than is the position here. where israel conscripts almost all groups in comparison to the all-volunteer force of the uk or us, and demands former conscripts remain on the reserve list, there is a blurring between the civilian and the military. for me, many of the deaths in israel a couple of weeks back were more akin to the deaths of off-duty udr soldiers in the six counties rather than the killings of civilians. the way in which the israeli government has now distributed weapons to a great number of their population blurs matters further. it's not 'everyone who isn't in the army is a civilian', as it is here. there are armed 'civilian security squads' or the civil guard - Israel arms civilian security squads, fearing internal strife. are they civilians? not armed by the government they're not imo. but hey if you want to actually discuss it then have at it.
yesCan you explain how you think this has been propagandised by Israel? For example have they claimed that attacks purely on civilian security guards and not actual civilians are attacks on civilians?
yeh in some societies it is more complex than is the position here. where israel conscripts almost all groups in comparison to the all-volunteer force of the uk or us, and demands former conscripts remain on the reserve list, there is a blurring between the civilian and the military. for me, many of the deaths in israel a couple of weeks back were more akin to the deaths of off-duty udr soldiers in the six counties rather than the killings of civilians. the way in which the israeli government has now distributed weapons to a great number of their population blurs matters further. it's not 'everyone who isn't in the army is a civilian', as it is here. there are armed 'civilian security squads' or the civil guard - Israel arms civilian security squads, fearing internal strife. are they civilians? not armed by the government they're not imo. but hey if you want to actually discuss it then have at it.
Netan the yahoo has already signalled that he doesn't give a shit about the hostages, and the hostages' families have been physically harassed by Bibi supporters when demonstrating for their relatives' return.It seems like the pressure from within Israeli society to focus on freeing hostages is a big contributing factor to the delay to ground invasion. Such an invasion will lead to hostage executions. Not sure any of the apparent hostage executions talked about further up thread are actually verified tbh. I'm certainly not watching any videos or even looking at any pics. Still far too scarred from the ISIS stuff.
the expulsion of the Palestinians is the absolute foreground, the reality, the thing that has fucked up the lives of the Palestinians.