Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hamas/Israel conflict: news and discussion

It's facile because it's trying to make abstract the realities of the Palestinian struggle especially wrt the right of return. I know people find my position beyond the pale but the abstract leftism alternative is more terrible in real terms. The silent dispossession of millions and the self-absolvement via abstract one-size-fits-all slogans is a moral failure.
 
I didn’t say that either. I was responding to a specific point.
No, you said 'we're all on settlers' land'. But because we're not all on settlers' land in the same way, that is a facile thing to say on this thread.

It's also facile to call people putting Palestinian flags on their social media 'embarrassing' and give them a lecture about statism.

Sorry Danny, I usually agree with you on here, but I think you have these things wrong.
 
I don't want to linger too much on from the events of 7th October, it's in danger of derailing the thread
The events of 7th October are the reason that this thread exists.

The reason I’ve been obsessing so much over recognising the atrocities from that day for what they are, is that in the first few days of this thread, there seemed to be very little recognition of what had happened, with discussion almost immediately turning to the crimes the Israeli state would inevitably visit upon the Palestinian people. At first I thought it might have been because people perhaps weren’t aware of the scale of the murders, but it soon became clear that people were either going to start denying the atrocities or just ignore any discussion of them.

Loads of people completely disbelieved the reports of decapitated babies, calling them lies or misinformation, designed to gain undeserved sympathy for Jewish civilians (many of those murdered weren’t even Israeli citizens, not that that should matter). People refused to believe the first hand accounts when they came out, presumably wanting to see the photographic evidence of the dead children before they would even countenance it. Those initial reports have now been proven to be correct.

Many of those same people were quick to believe Hamas when they said 500 people were killed by an Israeli air strike on a hospital, ridiculing anyone who cast doubt on that version of events, calling them apologists for Israeli war crimes, and yet that has almost certainly been proven to be incorrect, with (fortunately) far fewer people killed and a misfiring Hamas rocket almost certainly the culprit according to multiple news agencies, governments and independent analysts.

This entire horrible situation is a fucking tragedy, with the Israeli government responsible for much of it now and historically, but the commentary and analysis on this thread has been absolutely abysmal with multiple examples of atrocity denial and apologism.
 
Fwiw, I think danny and LDC are among the very best posters in the politics forums (and elsewhere). I hate disagreeing with them.
 
No, you said 'we're all on settlers' land'. But because we're not all on settlers' land in the same way, that is a facile thing to say on this thread.

It's also facile to call people putting Palestinian flags on their social media 'embarrassing' and give them a lecture about statism.

Sorry Danny, I usually agree with you on here, but I think you have these things wrong.
His position is consistent though. He doesn’t support Hamas or the Israeli state but the working class on both ‘sides’.
 
Consideration of the difficulties Israel will face entering Gaza and potential consequences https://carnegie-mec.org/diwan/90805
The Israeli military understands that it may lose a significant number of soldiers in the labyrinthine, rubble-filled byways of Gaza, against determined Hamas combatants who have a home advantage. Success may be achievable if the objectives are clearly defined and narrowed, but at this point nothing in Israel’s stated goals are anything but ambiguous, overambitious, and based on a misperception of what the regional and global mood will accept...
...In other words, unless Israel is willing to enter every home in Gaza and arrest tens of thousands of young men suspected of being Hamas members, and carries them off (a near-unworkable endeavor), there are no guarantees that it can terminate the organization. And that’s assuming the Israelis will have the opportunity to knock on doors and investigate everybody to determine their loyalties while military fronts are opened up from Lebanon, Syria, and perhaps the West Bank. Such a scenario is so ludicrous that it’s impossible to imagine it happening.
 
The events of 7th October are the reason that this thread exists.

The reason I’ve been obsessing so much over recognising the atrocities from that day for what they are, is that in the first few days of this thread, there seemed to be very little recognition of what had happened, with discussion almost immediately turning to the crimes the Israeli state would inevitably visit upon the Palestinian people. At first I thought it might have been because people perhaps weren’t aware of the scale of the murders, but it soon became clear that people were either going to start denying the atrocities or just ignore any discussion of them.

Loads of people completely disbelieved the reports of decapitated babies, calling them lies or misinformation, designed to gain undeserved sympathy for Jewish civilians (many of those murdered weren’t even Israeli citizens, not that that should matter). People refused to believe the first hand accounts when they came out, presumably wanting to see the photographic evidence of the dead children before they would even countenance it. Those initial reports have now been proven to be correct.

Many of those same people were quick to believe Hamas when they said 500 people were killed by an Israeli air strike on a hospital, ridiculing anyone who cast doubt on that version of events, calling them apologists for Israeli war crimes, and yet that has almost certainly been proven to be incorrect, with (fortunately) far fewer people killed and a misfiring Hamas rocket almost certainly the culprit according to multiple news agencies, governments and independent analysts.

This entire horrible situation is a fucking tragedy, with the Israeli government responsible for much of it now and historically, but the commentary and analysis on this thread has been absolutely abysmal with multiple examples of atrocity denial and apologism.

I tell you what. I actually agree with most of that. I understand where you are coming from. I'm not interested in minimising Hamas/PIJ atrocities. There's just so much else at stake that I fear you're missing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PTK
And the working class in Israel are therefore an oppressing class?
There are workers at kibbutzim taking part in long-term collectivist experiments, setting often amazing examples of how such places could work. But you know where I'm going with this. In many instances, those kibbutzim are literally built on the ruins of Palestinian villages, while the people they displaced languish in Gaza.

What do you do with that?
 
There are workers at kibbutzim taking part in long-term collectivist experiments, setting often amazing examples of how such places could work. But you know where I'm going with this. In many instances, those kibbutzim are literally built on the ruins of Palestinian villages, while the people they displaced languish in Gaza.

What do you do with that?
I think Danny’s position (and mine tbh) is that the Palestinian working class and the Israeli working class reject the boss factions and build peace together.
It’s unlikely, but why not?
 
Yes, if you read my posts you’ll find I said it was very different if you’re a Palestinian.

This is what happens, though. I’m against Westerners putting national flags in their profile and already I’m “against organisation” and I called everyone on the demonstrations “a Westerner on Facebook”. I’m not, and I didn’t.

Fwiw I’ve supported solidarity for Palestinians for decades, been on many marches and demos (although not yesterday, due to my disability). And I’ve donated to MAP. And I do all of this without waving national flags.

This is what you said in reply littlebabyjesus

Among other things, waving that flag is an act of defiance. It's a way of saying 'we're still here'. It isn't support for Hamas. It isn't anti-Jewish. The flag of a dispossessed people means something a bit more than just narrow-minded nationalism.

To that you said:
I didn’t say it was pro Hamas or antiJewish. I said it was embarrassing, simplistic and nationalist. It’s a symptom of a statist world view

I gather from other posts it is the workers across borders should unite etc. Fair enough. But if one is against flag waving that includes all who do it. Which is what you are implying in reply to LBJ is that - its the same who ever does it. Including those on the demo who are British and Western but have a middle eastern background.
 
Not at all, my point is that you if you're very selective about the historical context that you you choose to apply when excusing terrorism, people might assume that you do actually want to excuse terrorism and that you aren't actually interested in the historical context.
We would be entitled to assume that if you are mentioning events in Roman times then you are justifying the expulsion of the Palestinian Arabs from the land on which they lived.
 
I think Danny’s position (and mine tbh) is that the Palestinian working class and the Israeli working class reject the boss factions and build peace together.
It’s unlikely, but why not?
First acknowledging and second somehow addressing historical injustices, and the Nakba specifically, would need to involve painful compromises from both sides, and that includes many in Israel who might be identified as working class. But as I said, I'm not sure that term has much meaning when talking about the people of Gaza, who are displaced, dispossessed refugees.

The danger, of course, as we have seen, is that Islamism steps in as the ideology of liberation and hope. tbh right now, imho, simple solidarity with Palestinians as a people, as represented even perhaps by a flag, is what is needed here. Not lectures. Some sort of acknowledgement of Palestinians as a nation is going to be required in any realistic settlement. Some kind of a joint state in which equal rights, representation and guarantees are given to two identities - Arab/Palestinian and Israeli/Jew. We cannot pretend such identities don't exist or can be overridden by an underlying class interest. That's just not going to happen.
 
And the working class in Israel are therefore an oppressing class?
Certainly, in the past, the trade union federation was an integral part of the Zionist project. That does not mean that the Jewish working class of Israel was or is an oppressing class, but an analogy would be with the White working class in South Africa, which benefitted from apartheid in that country.
"The Histadrut became one of the most powerful institutions in the state of Israel, a mainstay of the Labour Zionist movement and, aside from being a trade union, its state-building role made it the owner of a number of businesses and factories."
 
Certainly, in the past, the trade union federation was an integral part of the Zionist project. That does not mean that the Jewish working class of Israel was or is an oppressing class, but an analogy would be with the White working class in South Africa, which benefitted from apartheid in that country.
"The Histadrut became one of the most powerful institutions in the state of Israel, a mainstay of the Labour Zionist movement and, aside from being a trade union, its state-building role made it the owner of a number of businesses and factories."
People often argue that the English working class benefited from slavery. I’m not sure I like this argument given the English working class weren’t the ones enslaving anyone and were also being exploited by the very same class who were doing the slavery.
 
Last edited:
In One Complete Palestine by Tom Segev ( history of the mandate) he sometimes mentions , if I remember correctly, that Jewish workers and Palestinians worked side by side in some towns.

Some Jews who went to Palestine realised it wasn't an empty land. Nor were they interested in some of the more pure Zionists in going out to countryside to build a new society. They stayed in towns and ended up with some mixing with Arabs.

The hard line Zionists weren't keen on this and attempts were made to get Jewish employers to hire Jews

It is I think part of what Ilan Pappe and Tom Segev say in their histories. Things could have turned out different.

As it was workers uniting across ethnic lines didn't happen with the Nakba leading to mass expulsion. The remaining Palestinians treated as second class citizens.

On expulsion it was any Palestinian - middle class or working class who got expelled.

Zionism is a form of ethni nationalism. Its as Tony Judt says a kind of 19c European nationalism that's past it's sell by date.

Modernising it to include others is going to be uphill task. I don't see proper class politics happening unless the occupation and Zionism as an idea are dealt with.
 
People often argue that the English working class benefited from slavery. I’m not sure I like this argument given the English working class weren’t the ones enslaving anyone and were also being exploited by the very same class who were doing the slavery.
This is a tricky case to argue, though. It’s not just slavey, it’s the whole project of colonialism. For example, the UK extracted about £30tn in today’s terms from its colonisation of India alone. By comparison, the UK’s current GDP is about £1tn*. A lot of this enormous extracted wealth went into funding the wealth of the capitalist robber barons and aristocracy. But a lot also funded the Victorian infrastructure that we still use today. It’s hard to argue that the relative advantage that even the poor of the UK have over the poor of India is not partially a result of that colonial time.


*These numbers are from memory, so forgive me if they’re a bit out — exact figures aren’t really the point
 
Can people just stop this pointless derail about some fantasy workers socialist republic being the solution to this problem, JFC that isn't going to happen.

Can we just stick to the bloody real world, please?

Mixed feelings about this post, but overall yeah.
 
People often argue that the English working class benefited from slavery. I’m not sure I like this argument given the English working class weren’t the ones enslaving anyone and were also being exploited by the very same class who were doing the slavery.

People also sometimes argue that slavery raised the living conditions of slaves.
Both arguments deserve equally short shrift.
 
Zionism is a form of ethni nationalism. Its as Tony Judt says a kind of 19c European nationalism that's past it's sell by date.

Modernising it to include others is going to be uphill task.

It’s the only way forward that I can see. Jews were returned their ethnic homeland, and I don’t see taking it away as any solution.
They will have to learn to share it, however.

Imo.

Obv sounds like more than a bit of a stretch right now.
 
It’s the only way forward that I can see. Jews were returned their ethnic homeland, and I don’t see taking it away as any solution.
They will have to learn to share it, however.

Imo.

Obv sounds like more than a bit of a stretch right now.
From what i can gather from this evening's news they are not in learning mode-rather the opposite in fact.
 
It’s the only way forward that I can see. Jews were returned their ethnic homeland, and I don’t see taking it away as any solution.
They will have to learn to share it, however.

Imo.

Obv sounds like more than a bit of a stretch right now.
"ethnic homeland"?
What is one of them?
It sounds like a concept that the far-right would use.
 
Back
Top Bottom