littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
I can only repeat: we're not all on settlers' land in the same way. It's a facile point to make.I haven’t at any point said otherwise.
I can only repeat: we're not all on settlers' land in the same way. It's a facile point to make.I haven’t at any point said otherwise.
I didn’t say that either. I was responding to a specific point.I can only repeat: we're not all on settlers' land in the same way. It's a facile point to make.
Did anyone attend the vigil in Parliament Square today?
Peace was found in NI although a shaky one. Another problem introduced by the British.I was 15 at the time of the Six Day War, I'm 71 now, and the rockets and bombs are still killing people.
Short of total occupation by the UN, and a forcible land division to create two states, I can't see an end to this.
Peace was found in NI although a shaky one. Another problem introduced by the British.
You’re trying to place libertarian socialist ideals (which I agree with) on a situation that is enforced by guns.I didn’t say that either. I was responding to a specific point.
No, you said 'we're all on settlers' land'. But because we're not all on settlers' land in the same way, that is a facile thing to say on this thread.I didn’t say that either. I was responding to a specific point.
The events of 7th October are the reason that this thread exists.I don't want to linger too much on from the events of 7th October, it's in danger of derailing the thread
His position is consistent though. He doesn’t support Hamas or the Israeli state but the working class on both ‘sides’.No, you said 'we're all on settlers' land'. But because we're not all on settlers' land in the same way, that is a facile thing to say on this thread.
It's also facile to call people putting Palestinian flags on their social media 'embarrassing' and give them a lecture about statism.
Sorry Danny, I usually agree with you on here, but I think you have these things wrong.
The Israeli military understands that it may lose a significant number of soldiers in the labyrinthine, rubble-filled byways of Gaza, against determined Hamas combatants who have a home advantage. Success may be achievable if the objectives are clearly defined and narrowed, but at this point nothing in Israel’s stated goals are anything but ambiguous, overambitious, and based on a misperception of what the regional and global mood will accept...
...In other words, unless Israel is willing to enter every home in Gaza and arrest tens of thousands of young men suspected of being Hamas members, and carries them off (a near-unworkable endeavor), there are no guarantees that it can terminate the organization. And that’s assuming the Israelis will have the opportunity to knock on doors and investigate everybody to determine their loyalties while military fronts are opened up from Lebanon, Syria, and perhaps the West Bank. Such a scenario is so ludicrous that it’s impossible to imagine it happening.
The events of 7th October are the reason that this thread exists.
The reason I’ve been obsessing so much over recognising the atrocities from that day for what they are, is that in the first few days of this thread, there seemed to be very little recognition of what had happened, with discussion almost immediately turning to the crimes the Israeli state would inevitably visit upon the Palestinian people. At first I thought it might have been because people perhaps weren’t aware of the scale of the murders, but it soon became clear that people were either going to start denying the atrocities or just ignore any discussion of them.
Loads of people completely disbelieved the reports of decapitated babies, calling them lies or misinformation, designed to gain undeserved sympathy for Jewish civilians (many of those murdered weren’t even Israeli citizens, not that that should matter). People refused to believe the first hand accounts when they came out, presumably wanting to see the photographic evidence of the dead children before they would even countenance it. Those initial reports have now been proven to be correct.
Many of those same people were quick to believe Hamas when they said 500 people were killed by an Israeli air strike on a hospital, ridiculing anyone who cast doubt on that version of events, calling them apologists for Israeli war crimes, and yet that has almost certainly been proven to be incorrect, with (fortunately) far fewer people killed and a misfiring Hamas rocket almost certainly the culprit according to multiple news agencies, governments and independent analysts.
This entire horrible situation is a fucking tragedy, with the Israeli government responsible for much of it now and historically, but the commentary and analysis on this thread has been absolutely abysmal with multiple examples of atrocity denial and apologism.
I don't think class analysis makes a lot of sense when you're talking about Gaza. They are all prisoner class.His position is consistent though. He doesn’t support Hamas or the Israeli state but the working class on both ‘sides’.
And the working class in Israel are therefore an oppressing class?I don't think class analysis makes a lot of sense when you're talking about Gaza. They are all prisoner class.
There are workers at kibbutzim taking part in long-term collectivist experiments, setting often amazing examples of how such places could work. But you know where I'm going with this. In many instances, those kibbutzim are literally built on the ruins of Palestinian villages, while the people they displaced languish in Gaza.And the working class in Israel are therefore an oppressing class?
I think Danny’s position (and mine tbh) is that the Palestinian working class and the Israeli working class reject the boss factions and build peace together.There are workers at kibbutzim taking part in long-term collectivist experiments, setting often amazing examples of how such places could work. But you know where I'm going with this. In many instances, those kibbutzim are literally built on the ruins of Palestinian villages, while the people they displaced languish in Gaza.
What do you do with that?
Yes, if you read my posts you’ll find I said it was very different if you’re a Palestinian.
This is what happens, though. I’m against Westerners putting national flags in their profile and already I’m “against organisation” and I called everyone on the demonstrations “a Westerner on Facebook”. I’m not, and I didn’t.
Fwiw I’ve supported solidarity for Palestinians for decades, been on many marches and demos (although not yesterday, due to my disability). And I’ve donated to MAP. And I do all of this without waving national flags.
Among other things, waving that flag is an act of defiance. It's a way of saying 'we're still here'. It isn't support for Hamas. It isn't anti-Jewish. The flag of a dispossessed people means something a bit more than just narrow-minded nationalism.
I didn’t say it was pro Hamas or antiJewish. I said it was embarrassing, simplistic and nationalist. It’s a symptom of a statist world view
We would be entitled to assume that if you are mentioning events in Roman times then you are justifying the expulsion of the Palestinian Arabs from the land on which they lived.Not at all, my point is that you if you're very selective about the historical context that you you choose to apply when excusing terrorism, people might assume that you do actually want to excuse terrorism and that you aren't actually interested in the historical context.
First acknowledging and second somehow addressing historical injustices, and the Nakba specifically, would need to involve painful compromises from both sides, and that includes many in Israel who might be identified as working class. But as I said, I'm not sure that term has much meaning when talking about the people of Gaza, who are displaced, dispossessed refugees.I think Danny’s position (and mine tbh) is that the Palestinian working class and the Israeli working class reject the boss factions and build peace together.
It’s unlikely, but why not?
Certainly, in the past, the trade union federation was an integral part of the Zionist project. That does not mean that the Jewish working class of Israel was or is an oppressing class, but an analogy would be with the White working class in South Africa, which benefitted from apartheid in that country.And the working class in Israel are therefore an oppressing class?
People often argue that the English working class benefited from slavery. I’m not sure I like this argument given the English working class weren’t the ones enslaving anyone and were also being exploited by the very same class who were doing the slavery.Certainly, in the past, the trade union federation was an integral part of the Zionist project. That does not mean that the Jewish working class of Israel was or is an oppressing class, but an analogy would be with the White working class in South Africa, which benefitted from apartheid in that country.
"The Histadrut became one of the most powerful institutions in the state of Israel, a mainstay of the Labour Zionist movement and, aside from being a trade union, its state-building role made it the owner of a number of businesses and factories."
This is a tricky case to argue, though. It’s not just slavey, it’s the whole project of colonialism. For example, the UK extracted about £30tn in today’s terms from its colonisation of India alone. By comparison, the UK’s current GDP is about £1tn*. A lot of this enormous extracted wealth went into funding the wealth of the capitalist robber barons and aristocracy. But a lot also funded the Victorian infrastructure that we still use today. It’s hard to argue that the relative advantage that even the poor of the UK have over the poor of India is not partially a result of that colonial time.People often argue that the English working class benefited from slavery. I’m not sure I like this argument given the English working class weren’t the ones enslaving anyone and were also being exploited by the very same class who were doing the slavery.
Can people just stop this pointless derail about some fantasy workers socialist republic being the solution to this problem, JFC that isn't going to happen.
Can we just stick to the bloody real world, please?
People often argue that the English working class benefited from slavery. I’m not sure I like this argument given the English working class weren’t the ones enslaving anyone and were also being exploited by the very same class who were doing the slavery.
Zionism is a form of ethni nationalism. Its as Tony Judt says a kind of 19c European nationalism that's past it's sell by date.
Modernising it to include others is going to be uphill task.
From what i can gather from this evening's news they are not in learning mode-rather the opposite in fact.It’s the only way forward that I can see. Jews were returned their ethnic homeland, and I don’t see taking it away as any solution.
They will have to learn to share it, however.
Imo.
Obv sounds like more than a bit of a stretch right now.
"ethnic homeland"?It’s the only way forward that I can see. Jews were returned their ethnic homeland, and I don’t see taking it away as any solution.
They will have to learn to share it, however.
Imo.
Obv sounds like more than a bit of a stretch right now.