Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hamas/Israel conflict: news and discussion

You've also got some people using this line as to why netanyahu shouldn't have an arrest warrant taken out on him. Personally I'd be more than happy for all of them and others to be charged and tried as well.

View attachment 452106

As MEE and others pointed out yesterday, a big part (probably the most significant part) of the reason why the three above were not charged by the ICC is because there have been Parliamentary and judicial procedures against those individuals / people associated with those acts in their countries. They might have been insufficient procedures, the people responsible might have evaded the sentences that many people thought they should have faced, but there was an attempt at an independent reckoning and that has usually been enough to dissuade the ICC.

Contrast this with the complete and well-documented absence of nearly any legal consequences to individuals for Israeli military / political actions during the occupation, or indeed for anything else carried out “for the state” such as assassinations, terror attacks, espionage or anything else abroad. There are a handful of individuals who’ve faced trial or court martial for killing or mistreating people under occupation, most of them many years ago and (as Katz reminded everyone last night) an obviously and increasingly racist system of justice that operates there. In short there’s no alternative to the ICC getting involved.

Sadly though I think providing an alternative (the establishment of a relatively independent tribunal within Israel) is going to be the most likely way in which these warrants go away; that tribunal will tear Netanyahu up (for his failures before October 7th and afterwards) and do nothing about the multitude killed in Gaza, but it will be enough for the ICC to drop this.
 
You've also got some people using this line as to why netanyahu shouldn't have an arrest warrant taken out on him. Personally I'd be more than happy for all of them and others to be charged and tried as well.

View attachment 452106
Proper whataboutery there from Mazzig. Did he raise any objections to the invasion of Iraq? I don't think he did. I'd like to see him in the dock at The Hague. In fact, anyone who propagandises on behalf of Netanyahu's mobster regime should face justice.
 
Headline from Haaretz. I wonder how long it'll be before Netanyahu tries to close them down?

View attachment 452105


Moves to something similar have been suggested.

Israel targets Haaretz after publisher calls Palestinians 'freedom fighters' see
Justice Minister Yariv Levin also sent a letter on Thursday to Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miar requesting powers to restrict Haaretz's operations.

"I ask that you urgently provide me with a draft law stipulating that actions by Israeli citizens to promote or encourage international sanctions on Israel, its leaders, security forces, and citizens shall constitute a criminal offence punishable by ten years in prison," he wrote.
 
Thought this was interesting article


It goes into the history of left/ progressive support for Israel/ Zionism.

There was a time post war when support for Israel ( the Labour Zionist version) was the norm.

Partly due to it being seen as building socialism and also due to Holocaust.

Back then there was little interest in Palestinians.

Generally the historiography put forward by Israel was accepted. That Palestinians left due to other Arab countries encouraging them. Etc. The Nakba was never mentioned

It wasn't until later , though the article doesn't mention this, that the Israeli new historians revised this version of history.

Change started to happen in 67. With Israel occupying West Bank and Gaza.
Then in early 80s the attack on Lebanon to remove PLO.
There has since been a complete role reversal. Israel’s staunchest defenders are now to be found on the right: see any issue of the Telegraph, or the Spectator, which is today unrecognisable from the paper Gilmour edited, or the Spectator for which I worked in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Today the left has no more fashionable cause than Palestine,

Support for Labour Zionism goes back to early days of Labour party. Explains why it's been such a contentious issue in the party. It's not just about Starmer. Support for (Labour) Zionism has deep roots in the party going back decades.
 
Last edited:
She's the Home Secretary , a post of which I got the impression was responsible for law enforcement

Yes and her evasive answer is in stark contrast with Irish PM,


Yes absolutely. We support international courts and we apply their warrants," Harris told national broadcaster RTE on Friday when asked if Netanyahu would be arrested if he arrived in Ireland for whatever reason.
 
I check David Lammy the foreign secretary X and nothing on the ICC warrants.
I suspect that the lack of any comment on the ICC arrest warrants is because Lammy knows that as the UK is a signatory to the Rome Statute we should uphold and be prepared to act on arrest warrants issued by them.

I really can't imagine why neither he nor Stasrmer would not make a statement on this.

* Removes tongue from cheek *
 
A short read but important one.

Whilst attention is on Gaza the ongoing Zionist project inside the Israeli state that started in 48 still goes on

The first time this community were moved was in 1952 so a Kibbutz could be built. Dispossession didn't end with State of Israel being founded.

Despite these Bedouins being Israeli citizens they were second class ones.


In this short piece the writer shows how Zionism was/ is about removing people and replacing them with Jews.

This is Zionism’s sleaze laid bare: depriving the Negev’s Palestinian residents of the most basic living conditions for generations, before one day replacing them with a Jewish community in the name of “making the desert bloom.”

Its been like that from the beginning.

The same tactics used inside Israel as used in West Bank. They started in 48 and arguably 67 occupation was a continuation of them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tim
This morning our synagogue hosted a community leader from Kibbutz Reim (which the synagogue has formed a partership with), where a number of people were murdered as were many, many of their friends at the neighbouring Nova festival. While it was heartening to hear about all the resources enabling the community to recover, I thought repeatedly about the countless Palestinian people undergoing that level of trauma again and again, for over a year, with nowhere to go for support or safety or recovery.

I'll say this woman from Reim sounded as though she was not unsympathetic towards the Palestinian people and stated that she was unhappy with how then right has claimed 'Zionism', but it's when I mentioned to my other half how I felt hearing the story of the kibbutz and he was having the exact same thought as me.
 
Must say I always assumed Kibbutz were the nicer side of Zionism

Now I've read more of the history Ive changed my mind

Particularly after establishment of Israeli state the Kibbutz set up then were part military outposts part building the new Labour Zionist state.

Those Kibbutz near what was then new Gaza strip were involved in the border wars post 48 as Palestinians tried to get back to their farms and homes.

These were not the religious hardliners now seen in West Bank. But the secular Zionist equivalents.

The border wars, now largely forgotten, were start of Palestinian resistance.

Good article here by the founder of the Palestinian Land Society of exhibition at Kibbutz built on land taken from Palestinians.


Its like Israeli went through a stage of amnesia about what really happened.

Eitan invited the settlers in Al Ma’in and neighboring areas to come and see the exhibit. His message was simple. These were the people who lived here and are now refugees two kilometers away behind the barbed wire in the Gaza Strip. The presentation implied that Israel took their property and now you live in it.

The founder of Palestine Land Society recounts what happened

The angriest comments. and indeed threats, came from an old Kibbutznik, over 80, who witnessed and participated in the attack on Al Ma’in. The Haganah militia attacked Al Ma’in on May 14, 1948 in 24 armored vehicles, destroyed and burned homes, demolished the school that was built in 1920, blew up the motorized well and the flour mill. They were resisted bravely for several hours by 15 Palestinian defenders armed by old rifles. As a child, I witnessed the smoldering remains of my village while I was huddled with other children and women in a nearby ravine

And this isn't ancient history.
 
As night follows day...

View attachment 451916

Crazed ethno-fascist also claiming ICC is antisemitic:

View attachment 451922
They're playing right into the hands of antisemites with their knee-jerk hysterical accusations of antisemitism at the slightest critique. If you weaponise something and use it often enough as a cudgel with which to silence dissent, eventually the timeworn go-to statement itself is robbed of its meaning and power. Thus when genuine acts of antisemitism are perpetrated, those who enact them can just point to the constant use of it saying "yeah, but come on, they always say that though, don't they?"...

Do the likes of netanyahu and ben-gvir not see how short-sighted and self-defeating that is?
 
Israel is not an ICC member state, and so is not under their agreement. Gaza, however, is, which is where it is tricky for Israel.


I don't suppose Bibi will actually be going to Gaza anytime soon, and if he did the local authorities might find it difficult to arrest him. Qatar isn't a member of the ICC so anyone else in the Hamas leadership who might face similar charges should be safe too, unless they make the mistake of accepting the hospitality of the Iranians.
 
Last edited:
A short read but important one.

Whilst attention is on Gaza the ongoing Zionist project inside the Israeli state that started in 48 still goes on

The first time this community were moved was in 1952 so a Kibbutz could be built. Dispossession didn't end with State of Israel being founded.

Despite these Bedouins being Israeli citizens they were second class ones.


In this short piece the writer shows how Zionism was/ is about removing people and replacing them with Jews.



Its been like that from the beginning.

The same tactics used inside Israel as used in West Bank. They started in 48 and arguably 67 occupation was a continuation of them.

It also highlights the way you can be removed and replaced if you are the wrong sort of Jew:

"Zionism’s demographic engineering is not limited to Palestinians. The story of Givat Amal, a Mizrahi neighborhood in Tel Aviv that was forcibly evicted and demolished in 2021, has many parallels to the story of Umm al-Hiran; there, too, the state compelled a marginalized community to move to a frontier area, never regulated their status or rights to the land, and as soon as that land’s value increased, it expelled the residents out of greed."


And if you are a Bedouin who has been kidnapped by the cunts in Hamas, you are the wrong sort of Palestinian and suffer the same abuse and degregation as the other hostages. Assuming they haven't been murdered there are still three Bedouin being held by Hamas.

If you are a bedouin hostage who escapes, you'll be welcome back but Bibi will still demolish your village.


 
Back
Top Bottom