I went to one of his lectures there a few years ago.Tbf there are Israelis who would like Ilan Pappe. A respected historian he was hounded out of Israel academia for his views. And now works in Exeter uni.
I went to one of his lectures there a few years ago.Tbf there are Israelis who would like Ilan Pappe. A respected historian he was hounded out of Israel academia for his views. And now works in Exeter uni.
Netanyahu at the time organised a mock funeral for Rabin complete with noose.The Oslo accords were supported by Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin. The Israeli right opposed this and called for Rabin to be killed and he was.
This is going to be the war where no one agrees on even a basic version of the facts. I can't be arsed to find it now, but there was someone filmed at a demo claiming that all the anti-Hamas claims were false. You see the problem. That's going to circulate in the global lumpen-left for a long time to come. And even photographic evidence of the kind you describe won't be accepted by same.
And on the other side, unless all 2.4 million Gazans are killed (and maybe not even then) you'll have people say "that doesn't count as genocide, and anyway, they deserved it."
A political solution would have to go far beyond peace.Arafat was all for it then? Iran? Everyone but Israel wants peace. Right?
You're mellowingThough I would personally blame a lot of people for voting Tory but wouldn’t blow their house up for it.
I am surprised that the bastard who shot Rabin is still in nick.The Oslo accords were supported by Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin. The Israeli right opposed this and called for Rabin to be killed and he was.
Well it’s a principle not set in stone.You're mellowing
Ah but they will be wearing red...which is a la modeUnderstood. Another Tory government would be unthinkable. But the behaviour of the Labour leadership to me suggests that they will be just as dysfunctional and authoritarian.
They fear he'd shoot some moreI am surprised that the bastard who shot Rabin is still in nick.
The Oslo accords, if revived and implemented would probably do it. Lots of benefits all round except for the bigoted zionists.A political solution would have to go far beyond peace.
They may be transparent to you, they won't be to a great many others.Actually I think this is the first conflict I've ever seen where the basic facts are transparent (at least so far and barring a few quibbles).
Innit.They fear he'd shoot some more
Since 2015, the UK government has licensed hundreds of millions of pounds worth of military equipment to Israeli forces, including components for the F-35, which, in 2021, an Israeli government spokesperson said were used in attacks on Palestine
We repeat our call for a two-way arms embargo and for the UK to end arms sales and military support for Israeli forces
Where in the UK? That place in Brighton?Campaign against the Arms Trade statement.
Agree with this. There are things this country can do. One is stop supplying Israeli State military. Or supporting them in any way. Such as sending navy out there.
CAAT - CAAT Statement: Palestine
CAAT condemns the attacks which have caused the death and injury of thousands of civilians and stands in solidarity and compassion with all those affected by the atrocities, both in Gaza and Israel, and in communities around the world where there has been a drastic escalation in anti-Semitism...caat.org.uk
A quick refresher.
Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat sign accord for Palestinian self-rule | May 4, 1994 | HISTORY
On May 4, 1994, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat reach an agreement in Cairo on the first stage of Palestinian self-rule. The agreement was made in accordance with the Oslo Accords, signed in Washington, D.C. on September 13, 1993. This was the first direct...www.history.com
Also
Where in the UK? That place in Brighton?
Elbit Systems!Where in the UK? That place in Brighton?
Pardon? This reads like a refusal to engage your brain.I know about that. I just dont believe he was the force for peace. And yet back then you never saw what we have today. Just so you know, I see both sides in this, Israeli and Palestinian.
Who? Rabin or Arafat?I know about that. I just dont believe he was the force for peace. And yet back then you never saw what we have today. Just so you know, I see both sides in this, Israeli and Palestinian.
I know about that. I just dont believe he was the force for peace.
Because he's an expert on the subject who's done in-depth research?Why not? Arafat took a massive personal risk by even trying to make peace (so did Rabin). Why won't you give him credit?
Sure you're a libraI know about that. I just dont believe he was the force for peace. And yet back then you never saw what we have today. Just so you know, I see both sides in this, Israeli and Palestinian.
Pardon? This reads like a refusal to engage your brain.
It seems to be the case that the website of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign is suffering a "denial of service" attack, or something, as it “times out” when I try to access it.
DOS is possible but could simply be it's getting more traffic than usual and their server can't cope.It seems to be the case that the website of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign is suffering a "denial of service" attack, or something, as it “times out” when I try to access it.
IN 1970, Fatah, the most influential party within the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), released a series of essays collectively entitled, “Towards a Democratic State in Palestine.” The document—written before the PLO accepted the partition of historic Palestine into two states in 1988—declared that the PLO “assumes a great share of the responsibility in winning Jews to the side of the revolution.” To that end, Fatah not only promised that a future democratic Palestine would be devoid of “bias, racism or discrimination,” it also explicitly took up the question of Jewish safety. To Jews who believe their safety depends on oppressing Palestinians, the authors insisted, Palestinians must say “no security in the racist state but all security in the new democratic Palestine.” Repudiating an Algeria-style solution, in which Jews leave the land, the document envisions a country built on “cooperation and tolerance,” where both Arabic and Hebrew are official languages and where Jews—like other communities—have the right to “develop culturally and linguistically as a group