nino_savatte
No pasaran!
It’s blood libel to call a democratically elected baby killer a baby killer.
"The modern blood libel", she says.
It’s blood libel to call a democratically elected baby killer a baby killer.
Got a link?The majority of Israeli surveillance flights are by British military, Al Jaz reports. Utterly complicit, never mind the arms sales
There have been flight plans of RAF surveillance flights from Cyprus over Gaza shown on the internet.Got a link?
Got a link?
Archived editorial from Haaretz on the ICC warrants:
Starvation, Murder, Persecution: ICC Warrants Are an Unprecedented Moral Nadir for Israel
Interestingly Gramsci in the piece wrt to Israel having the facility to pursue it's own internal investigation into war crimes and crimes against humanity as is being suggested by UKLI
they regard this as a non-option:
View attachment 452333
Unfortunately, both the government and public opinion, with the support of most of the media, are refusing to listen. Instead, they are all hoping that Trump will enable Israel to continue, if not intensify, the actions that the International Criminal Court defines as crimes against humanity.
Israel has approved a resolution to cut ties with the Israeli news outlet Haaretz and ban government funding bodies from communicating or placing advertisements with the newspaper.
The government said its decision was due to “many articles that have hurt the legitimacy of the state of Israel and its right to self-defence, and particularly the remarks made in London by Haaretz publisher Amos Schocken that support terrorism and call for imposing sanctions on the government,” Haaretz reported on Sunday.
It's not what you defend, it's the way it is.Heres one for all the Israel apologists.this is what you defend.
Dying in ‘Hell’: The fate of Palestinian medics jailed by Israel
One of Gaza’s most prominent doctors may have been raped to death, recent revelations show. He’s not the only one.www.aljazeera.com
Israeli Confession that Quarter of Palestinian Detainees have been infected with Scabies
---------------
Haaretz:
The Israel Prison Service has acknowledged that about a quarter of Palestinian prisoners have contracted scabies in recent months.
The IPS's confession came in response to a petition filed by human rights organizations.
The Supreme Court considers a petition by human rights groups that the IPS has not taken the necessary measures to prevent the spread of the disease.
---------------
I haven't actually looked. I just saw a screenshot on Twitter and copied it here. They've pretty much nailed their colours to the mast though with that opening statement imo.Yeah, by targeting war criminals they're making a mockery of the whole idea of targeting war criminals.
I'm not going to actually read any of this shite but do any of these articles explain why Netanyahu's actions aren't crimes against humanity? Or do they just skirt round that whole issue?
Editorial Board
5–6 minutes
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has used chemical weapons and waged a bloody campaign of ethnic cleansing in his brutal suppression of an uprising that has killed half a million people, many of them civilians. In Myanmar, military dictator Gen. Min Aung Hlaing and his army have been responsible for bombing civilian villages in its war against the long-persecuted Rohingya minority. And in Sudan, a new potential genocide threatens the Darfur region’s Black Masalit people at the hands of Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, who is known as Hemedti, and his Rapid Support Forces.
So who does the International Criminal Court wish to arrest for war crimes? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense chief Yoav Gallant.
Israel is not a member of the ICC, and the warrants will have limited practical effect, except possibly preventing Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Gallant from traveling to countries which have pledged to enforce it. We say possibly because countries in the past have promised to uphold ICC arrest orders only to ignore them when convenient. Several European countries and Canada have suggested they would uphold the latest arrest orders; others have balked.
But the arrest orders undermine the ICC’s credibility and give credence to accusations of hypocrisy and selective prosecution. The ICC is putting the elected leaders of a democratic country with its own independent judiciary in the same category as dictators and authoritarians who kill with impunity. Israel went to war in response to the Hamas attack of Oct. 7, 2023, which left 1,200 Israelis dead and another 250 taken hostage, around 100 of whom still remain captive. The ICC’s arrest warrant for one of the authors of that massacre, Hamas leader Mohammed Deif, who was probably killed in an Israeli airstrike months ago, looks more like false equivalence than genuine balance.
To be sure, far too many innocent Palestinians have been killed and maimed in Israel’s 13-month-long war against Hamas: more than 44,000 have died, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. It says more than half of the fatalities have been women and children. The Israeli military says it has killed 17,000 militants; though its basis for that is unclear, even if accurate, it implies more than 60 percent killed have been noncombatants. Hamas is to blame for sheltering among civilians and hiding their weapons and command centers in tunnels beneath populated areas. But Israel, as a democratic country that is committed to human rights, must take responsibility for the civilian casualty toll.
Israel also has a responsibility to allow humanitarian aid to reach the millions of Palestinians displaced and suffering from an acute food shortage bordering on famine. On this, the Israeli government has fallen short. The State Department, in declining to impose sanctions on Israel for blocking aid deliveries, said it saw some recent improvements, such as a successful polio vaccination campaign in Gaza, another border crossing reopened, and an increase in the number of aid trucks allowed in over past month. But a Post analysis found that Israel has largely failed to comply with the U.S. government’s three main demands — a surge of humanitarian aid, not a trickle; access to Gaza for commercial trucks; and an end to Israeli’s siege of populated northern Gaza. To be sure, aid could have flowed in more quickly if Hamas had accepted a cease-fire deal to free the remaining hostages, but Hamas instead insisted on a withdrawal of all Israeli troops from Gaza and a permanent end to hostilities.
Israel needs to be held accountable for its military conduct in Gaza. After the conflict’s end — which is long overdue — there will no doubt be Israeli judicial, parliamentary and military commissions of inquiry. Israeli’s vibrant, independent media will do its own investigations. Some Israeli reserve soldiers have already been arrested over accusations of abuse against Palestinian detainees. More investigations will follow. The ICC is supposed to become involved when countries have no means or mechanisms to investigate themselves. That is not the case in Israel.
The United States has long had an ambivalent relationship with the ICC. It refuses to be a party to the court for fear of politically motivated prosecutions against U.S. service members overseas. But at times it has encouraged the ICC and lent support, as in the case of war crimes against Russian President Vladimir Putin for his invasion of Ukraine.
President-elect Donald Trump, in his first term, took a hostile stance toward the ICC. Mr. Trump imposed travel sanctions against ICC prosecutors and staff, which President Joe Biden lifted. The ill-considered arrest warrants against Israel only give Mr. Trump a new reason to halt American cooperation with the court, at a time when it’s needed for Russia, Sudan, Myanmar and conflicts elsewhere that atrocities are being committed with impunity and the victims have no other recourse.
Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara decides not to open criminal investigations into whether comments by senior Israeli officials in the wake of the October 7 Hamas massacres and atrocities could be considered incitement to violence or even genocide against Palestinian civilians in Gaza.
The announcement of the attorney general’s decision is made in her office’s response to a High Court petition filed by the Israel Democracy Guard organization in August, which requested that her office open criminal investigations into some of the highly inflammatory comments made by cabinet ministers and MKs, ostensibly endorsing indiscriminate attacks on Gaza.
Among the comments highlighted by the petition are Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu’s remark in November 2023 that the war in Gaza could be ended by dropping an atomic bomb on the territory, and Likud MK Galit Distel-Atbaryan’s call to “wipe Gaza off the face of the earth.”
On January 9, three days before the first hearing for South Africa’s suit in the International Court of Justice accusing Israel of genocide, the Attorney General’s Office said that law enforcement agencies had opened “examinations” into several of the problematic comments made by Israeli officials.
According to the Attorney General’s Office, however, a decision not to open criminal investigations was made on November 18.
One of the key provisional measures issued by the ICJ in its orders to Israel on January 26 was to “take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide” against the Palestinians.
I don't think they give a shit. They'll only presecute criminals they don't like. If it's one that's a a so-called ally that's all fine and dandy.Yeah, by targeting war criminals they're making a mockery of the whole idea of targeting war criminals.
I'm not going to actually read any of this shite but do any of these articles explain why Netanyahu's actions aren't crimes against humanity? Or do they just skirt round that whole issue?
Israel needs to be held accountable for its military conduct in Gaza. After the conflict’s end