8ball
Decolonise colons!
How many civilian casualties in the Falklands then, to give just one example?
I think the Jewish Chronicle would be unlikely to choose that particular example.
Last edited:
How many civilian casualties in the Falklands then, to give just one example?
"The Times was simply an example" which you gave more than once, starting by embedding someone's x-tweet with a scrolling video of the Times front page as it was in the early evening yesterday. You commented sarcastically about "the paper of record" (something the Times has not been for many decades). I went and looked, saw there was a story not yet on the 'front page' of their website and posted a link to an archived version of it. I didn't do so to contradict you but for the benefit of anyone who wanted to see what bollocks they had published.Well imo you're wrong about that. Also, the BBC is one of the worst culprits when it comes to burying important stories about Gaza, so it's not just The Times. The Times was simply an example given. And it is correct that they left it off their front page for the whole of yesterday. Your post seemingly justifying or excusing that omission was bizarre.
I pointed out that their ICJ story actually was now on the 'front page' and that they only remake their 'front page' a couple of times a day. I didn't do so because I was intent onTwelve people out of 30,000 working for UNRWA stand accused. Until the accusations are verified by someone other than Israel, I'm going to assume they are a lie. A lie that was of course coordinated with the ICJ ruling. And it's worked. As we saw on The Times front page - nothing about the ICJ ruling, only this story.
but to indicate that the Times front page was not continually updated like The Guardian's, and so all that could be drawn from it was whether or not they considered a story important enough to add it to the front page between remakes. Nine hours later their ICJ story is still there as I type this, although the Sunday Times remake has already begun. I also don't think one could draw any inferences from the fact it is still there.seemingly justifying or excusing that omission
Marvellous. Have we moved from 'no fighting in the war room' to 'no Gazans on the Gaza thread'?Meanwhile, trying to make your point using the tweets of someone from Gaza was a pretty low thing to do. Who here has been going on about the ICJ ruling being a 'game changer'? That's a crap straw man.
You might want to check who said what before you start ranting like this."The Times was simply an example" which you gave more than once, starting by embedding someone's x-tweet with a scrolling video of the Times front page as it was in the early evening yesterday. You commented sarcastically about "the paper of record" (something the Times has not been for many decades). I went and looked, saw there was a story not yet on the 'front page' of their website and posted a link to an archived version of it. I didn't do so to contradict you but for the benefit of anyone who wanted to see what bollocks they had published.
At 11.34am today you posted:
I pointed out that their ICJ story actually was now on the 'front page' and that they only remake their 'front page' a couple of times a day. I didn't do so because I was intent on
but to indicate that the Times front page was not continually updated like The Guardian's, and so all that could be drawn from it was whether or not they considered a story important enough to add it to the front page between remakes. Nine hours later their ICJ story is still there as I type this, although the Sunday Times remake has already begun. I also don't think one could draw any inferences from the fact it is still there.
Marvellous. Have we moved from 'no fighting in the war room' to 'no Gazans on the Gaza thread'?
This is an open thread about Gaza not about you.
Im not sure about that Hamas are going to be pretty fucked without Gaza existing
It is grotesque that so far the only real world effect of the ruling has been the defunding of UNRWA.
Until we have non-Israeli evidence, we should treat these accusations with giant scepticism. There may be something in it. Out of the 30,000 workers 12 may have helped Hamas. Still doesn't justify defunding. And of course, if it is true then Israel presenting it yesterday is no accident.
Also worth remembering that more than 150 UNRWA staff have been killed by Israel.
On Friday, an adviser to the Israeli prime minister told the BBC that the 7 October Hamas attacks had involved "people who are on their [UNRWA] salaries".
Mark Regev said there was information showing teachers working in UNRWA schools had "openly celebrated" the 7 October attacks.
He also referred to an Israeli hostage who, on her release, said she had been "held in the house of someone who worked for UNRWA".
"They have a union which is controlled by Hamas and I think it's high time that the UN investigated these links between UNRWA and Hamas," he added.
Colour me shocked. Utterly shameful. UNRWA has acted immediately upon being told of the allegations. There is no reason whatever for anyone to suspend funding. They should be increasing funding right now.Allegations so for seem a bit thin. From BBC online news.
Philippe Lazzarini has spoken out against the “shocking” decision of several Western nations to suspend aid for the UN’s Palestinian refugee agency, amid Israeli allegations that several employees may have taken part in the October 7 attacks, during a time of crucial need for displaced Palestinians.
Israel has long criticised and sought to dismantle the agency. UNRWA has launched an investigation into the allegations and fired the employees under review.
“UNRWA lifesaving assistance is about to end following countries decisions to cut their funding to the Agency. Our humanitarian operation, on which 2 million people depend as a lifeline in Gaza, is collapsing,” Lazzarini said in a social media post on Saturday.
“I am shocked such decisions are taken based on alleged behavior of a few individuals and as the war continues, needs are deepening & famine looms. Palestinians in Gaza did not need this additional collective punishment. This stains all of us.”
Or funding for cops despite evidence of widespread criminality in the policeSo they pause UNWRA funding after allegations of involvement in the attack but they don't pause arms shipments after supported allegations of genocide.
I Did. Bit of a waste of time in retrospect.You might want to check who said what before you start ranting like this.
That's your opinion. You've every right to hold and express it. Just as I have the right to an opinion about yours.The views of people in Gaza are more important than those of any of us here, but you were using them in a very particular and, imo, unpleasant way to shut down other posters.
In the paper copy of The Times there is only a small article on Page 42 about the ICJ ruling,"The Times was simply an example" which you gave more than once, starting by embedding someone's x-tweet with a scrolling video of the Times front page as it was in the early evening yesterday. You commented sarcastically about "the paper of record" (something the Times has not been for many decades). I went and looked, saw there was a story not yet on the 'front page' of their website and posted a link to an archived version of it. I didn't do so to contradict you but for the benefit of anyone who wanted to see what bollocks they had published.
At 11.34am today you posted:
I pointed out that their ICJ story actually was now on the 'front page' and that they only remake their 'front page' a couple of times a day. I didn't do so because I was intent on
but to indicate that the Times front page was not continually updated like The Guardian's, and so all that could be drawn from it was whether or not they considered a story important enough to add it to the front page between remakes. Nine hours later their ICJ story is still there as I type this, although the Sunday Times remake has already begun. I also don't think one could draw any inferences from the fact it is still there.
Marvellous. Have we moved from 'no fighting in the war room' to 'no Gazans on the Gaza thread'?
This is an open thread about Gaza not about you.
Yeah I'd be interested t know this too. I went on a teachers exchange to the West Bank almost a decade ago and from what I can remember there were free UNRWA schools, Fatah run state schools, and Hamas run private schools. This might be a simplification (or tbh just me misremembering), but id assume ppl teaching at UNRWA schools would be paid by UNRWA.Also on the teachers. I thought salaries for these kinds of jobs were paid through PA? Not Hamas directly?
Am I wrong on this?
So should not Israeli government raise this with the PA?
exactly!So they pause UNWRA funding after allegations of involvement in the attack but they don't pause arms shipments after supported allegations of genocide.
yes there were: the 'Doctors plot' in 2007I believe that there have been a couple of cases of doctors working for the NHS in Britain who have been accused of supporting terrorism. Should the government stop funding the NHS altogether? (Rather than underfunding and privatising it).
Yeah I'd be interested t know this too. I went on a teachers exchange to the West Bank almost a decade ago and from what I can remember there were free UNRWA schools, Fatah run state schools, and Hamas run private schools. This might be a simplification (or tbh just me misremembering), but id assume ppl teaching at UNRWA schools would be paid by UNRWA.
Tho at the time I went I doubt anyone was being paid cos the schools had been on strike for something like 10 weeks. The teachers we met were scathing of the national union and he NUT exchange (different to ours) which they saw as scabbing.
More than 40 percent of schools (288) in Gaza are run by the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), while the rest are either directly operated by the Palestinian Authority or privately managed.
Keir Starmer Refuses To Say Israeli War Crime Is A War Crime
if you'd spent the past five years hurling people out of your party on the basis of often doubtful accusations of anti-semitism due to criticism of the zionist entity you too might balk at declaring that the zionists are doing something wrong, lest you leave yourself open to accusations of hypocrisyCoincidentally just watched this,
On Gaza Starmer does the lawyerly one cannot make a judgement so soon. One must wait for the correct authorities to investigate and pronounce a judgement. I havent seen this particular footage etc.
Its oh so difficult to come up with an opinion.
( even though the bombing of Gaza has been going on for months its to early to have an opinion.)
Of course with Ukraine its different.
These war criminals need to be "hunted down" he says.
How he manages to do this with a straight face is beyond me,
Where will Hamas military physically exist?I doubt that entirely, it was dispossessing so many people that is at the heart of this after all.
That's so fucking disingenuous. Even if the allegations are true - and given that they've been made by Israel, they very well may be partially or entirely fabricated - aid money has not gone to terrorists. The allegations consist of UNRWA teachers celebrating the attack and an UNRWA employee's home being used by Hamas. Neither of those things constitute 'aid supporting terrorism'.Done with Labour.
View attachment 409972
UNRWA claims: UN chief in aid plea after staff accused of helping Hamas in Israel attack
Countries pause funding for UNRWA over Israeli allegations its staff were involved in the Hamas attacks.www.bbc.com
Where will Hamas military physically exist?
Where will Hamas military physically exist?