Broad is my Man of the Series
Maybe. I can only equate it to my own experiences of being on solid team in both sporting and non-sporting environments and IMO he’s putting himself first not the team.Bit harsh. I think his argument was stronger when the openers were more useless and no. 3 would be in more or less straightaway.
I didn't think much of Crawley until this series, he's contributed crucial runs on a couple of occasions now. Duckett I'm less convinced by (I made a joke yesterday at 11:56 about Duckett getting out soon on my cricket WhatsApp).
But Root hasn't really fired this series has he? He's not been the standout batsman of the team. Pretty much everyone has contributed an innings at some point. I'm glad the days of no one getting a score other than Root & Stokes are behind us tbh.
Anyway, him not liking no. 3 is pretty moot now isn't it. He'll just have to manage.
Here is a list of some of Broad’s non-cricket highs to date. Single-handedly voided the previous series. Invented the away swinger just to get Marnus out. Said the Carey/Bairstow run-out was literally the worst thing he’d ever seen in cricket. Said Zak Crawley clumping a four through the covers in a losing Test match was the greatest Ashes thing he’d ever seen. Spooked Alex Carey. Spooked David Warner. Successfully re-annoyed what seems to be the vast majority of the Australian public.
This has the potential to be a new 'Chuck Norris'-style memeI heard Broad wears a bandana to wind up Steve Smith who hates Guns N Roses
I heard it but don't know enough about the ball tampering to commentWas listening to TMS, just before the lunch break and they had Jim Maxwell and Glen McGrath on, talking about the ball tampering case. They got onto it because some wag had sent McGrath a piece of sandpaper and asked him to get the Aussies to sign it. I think they said something like 'it was proved there was no actual ball tampering and the real problem was the hastily arranged press conference, which was certainly wrong. They shouldn't have rushed into that' - or words to that effect. Did anyone else hear that, have I got it right??? Whatever level of outrage you have over the ball tampering and Smith's part in it, that just doesn't fit the accepted facts. As I remember it, it was planned and the 'leadership group' persuaded the bowler to do it (can't recall his name). But most of all it did happen and was recorded by the TV cameras.
Yes, I thought it was fairly bonkers too. Especially from a normally level headed McGrath. Seemed to be the only way Aussies can live with themselves is by this revisionist explanation that the real crime was the upper echelons of the CA establishment effectively 'owning up' to the cheating, and not the pre-meditation of the on-pitch leadership team bringing sandpaper on to the pitch, and trying to put it all on young Bancroft.Was listening to TMS, just before the lunch break and they had Jim Maxwell and Glen McGrath on, talking about the ball tampering case. They got onto it because some wag had sent McGrath a piece of sandpaper and asked him to get the Aussies to sign it. I think they said something like 'it was proved there was no actual ball tampering and the real problem was the hastily arranged press conference, which was certainly wrong. They shouldn't have rushed into that' - or words to that effect. Did anyone else hear that, have I got it right??? Whatever level of outrage you have over the ball tampering and Smith's part in it, that just doesn't fit the accepted facts. As I remember it, it was planned and the 'leadership group' persuaded the bowler to do it (can't recall his name). But most of all it did happen and was recorded by the TV cameras.
Piss poor from Stokes, only got a strike rate of 50. He needs to hit out or get out.
/Petcha
Spoken like a person who hasn't checked the weather forecast. Rain from mid afternoon tomorrow, on and off all day Monday.Looks like he's in his leisurely mode today. Still, a lead of 300-350 by stumps. Bat till lunch tomorrow and bobs ya uncle.
What do we reckon, 350? For me - even if it's 300, 400 or whatever, it's how we get there.
300 (legacy England style) is absolutely something to bowl at, but it would be in the context of a morale sapping collapse, which would, of course, spur Aussies on and give them such a boost.
Strange we're not having official word or any chatter on what exactly we're expecting Mo to do for the next couple of days.
Either way it's aA blessing (or curse!) of a Saturday with nothing to do other than overthink the shite out of this game
350 is Australia batting for 4 full sessions, and I doubt there will be 4 full sessions left in the match.What do we reckon, 350? For me - even if it's 300, 400 or whatever, it's how we get there.
300 (legacy England style) is absolutely something to bowl at, but it would be in the context of a morale sapping collapse, which would, of course, spur Aussies on and give them such a boost.
Strange we're not having official word or any chatter on what exactly we're expecting Mo to do for the next couple of days.
Either way it's aA blessing (or curse!) of a Saturday with nothing to do other than overthink the shite out of this game
American football is the outlier, in that their offensive players aren't involved in the defensive plays at all and vice versa.As an aside, there was an interesting point made much earlier today on TMS, in that Cricket is a sport (the only one?) where a professional sportsman has a specific individual role where they are expected to be rubbish (i.e tail enders batting).
I always thought it odd that American Football and Baseball has effectively complete separation (do they in Baseball?) or attacking/defending roles, but actually Cricket is probably the outlier in this regard?