Eh? What was a nonsense about it? They scored half the runs off 3 more balls than half the overs for loss of one wicket!Didn't matter in the end, but this is why I thought Pakistan's DLS win over NZ when they weren't even half-way was a nonsense.
Yes. But there was still the other half to get. And that's really hard. Most of the time, teams fail to sustain that rate. More often than not, at some point, set batters get out and it goes pear-shaped.Eh? What was a nonsense about it? They scored half the runs off 3 more balls than half the overs for loss of one wicket!
Just wait for Shami to return.
Yep, when you have cramp, it's just a matter of manning up.
Daryl Mitchell btw. I guess we can't call him underrated any more. He's building an amazing career for someone who didn't play any internationals until he was 28.
Is the 264 just assuming they'll keep going at this run rate? Which normally doesn't happen. (Take your point though)I wish they'd just dump these 'predictors'.
Atm, My5 says 306
Cricinfo says 264.
Science. Not.
Is the 264 just assuming they'll keep going at this run rate? Which normally doesn't happen. (Take your point though)
This could yet get interesting.
Nah.The bowling action of Bumrah is very dodgy, looks like a chuck to me!