littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Edit. Will just ignore him
Don't know about his bowling really let alone his batting. I still think rashid should be there.Does anyone know if Mason crane can bat? Leggies seem to bat better than orthodox spinners usually... No idea why that is often the case.
Nah, had a terrible red-ball season this year. Should have been Leach rather than Crane though.Don't know about his bowling really let alone his batting. I still think rashid should be there.
No, he'd probably be batting at 11 behind Anderson. First class batting average of 12, boosted by 40% of his innings being not out. And a f/c bowling average of 43. Statistically it's staggering that he's been picked ahead of Leach, never mind Rashid.Does anyone know if Mason crane can bat? Leggies seem to bat better than orthodox spinners usually... No idea why that is often the case.
what is he saying?From the hints and whispers from Swan, it sounds like neither Rashid nor test cricket want to be in a relationship.
Crane went to a prep and then a private school. Leach went to the local comp (now academy) and until recently was collecting trolleys in tesco. I think that's the real important stat.No, he'd probably be batting at 11 behind Anderson. First class batting average of 12, boosted by 40% of his innings being not out. And a f/c bowling average of 43. Statistically it's staggering that he's been picked ahead of Leach, never mind Rashid.
Mason Crane
Jack Leach
Surely it shouldn't be a problem as long as Leach didn't insist on being admitted to the pavilion?Crane went to a prep and then a private school. Leach went to the local comp (now academy) and until recently was collecting trolleys in tesco. I think that's the real important stat.
I didn't say it was something unique to England, although for cricket, it does appear to happen a lot more in England than elsewhere, I presume for financial reasons. Andrew Symonds is the only recent one of significance that I can think of off the top of my head that was born in England and represented Australia. Anyway, me stating that Stokes is a Kiwi is no excuse for the poor behaviour of your buddy. Seeing as you appear to be his minder, you might want to have a quiet word with him.There’ve been scores of players in many sports representing the national sides of countries they weren’t born in. Australia have had at least 25 test cricketers born overseas including a dozen or so Brits. It’s not a particulary English thing.
The ECB (and many clubs) have long real established historical fascist links.
Sure, but what matters is if you're good. Swann was an orthodox off spinner with no doosra. Best England spinner since Laker, arguably. Maybe Underwood gets a look in. Lyon, while he is a massive twat, is also a very good, orthodox bowler with little mystery.Surely the thing about Mason Crane is that he is a wrist spinner who can turn the ball both ways? It is a more exotic breed than left arm orthodox, and if that is a prejudice I freely admit to it.
Good point. Going back to Rashid for a second, I understand that he's had a shit season, but in odis, his googly is lethal. Nobody seems to pick it, and tailenders in particular seem at sea with him. I don't quite understand why he can't transfer that to red ball cricket.It'd be exotic to bat on stilts but I don't think it's a good idea. The love of Crane seems to be the worst combination of England's 'in-club' mentality and the decision to pick people based on what you want rather than what you have.
If Moeen doesn't bowl, do they then pick Crane? Or is it seam-up all the way? That would worry me.Woah. Scary number of posts about Mason Crane. He’s there to carry the drinks and fade back into obscurity isn’t he?
Moeen being touted as playing in Adelaide as a batsman, spinning finger fucked.
Much rain and dampness in Adelaide. England may not get a better chance than this.
If Moeen doesn't bowl, do they then pick Crane? Or is it seam-up all the way? That would worry me.
I do largely agree with this. Pace bowlers generally don't get criticised for having a lack of variations. And you can be a legendary bowler without any. And for a spinner to bowl a weak delivery for the sake of it being a variation is idiotic practice. The important thing for any spinner is a quality stock ball. And as you say, there is always the natural variation from the pitch (e.g. the classic Bell LBW Warne was just a legbreak that failed to grip)Another thing about mystery. Panesar used to get stick for his lack of guile, but it was unfair and misunderstood what he was trying to do. He was trying to bowl the same ball over and again. As Swann freely admits, it's very often your 'natural variation' that gets you wickets. If you don't know this particular one isn't going to turn, the batsman sure as hell doesn't.
A fast bowler, but the same principle applies to all bowling, imo: A story from Ottis Gibson.I do largely agree with this. Pace bowlers generally don't get criticised for having a lack of variations. And you can be a legendary bowler without any. And for a spinner to bowl a weak delivery for the sake of it being a variation is idiotic practice. The important thing for any spinner is a quality stock ball. And as you say, there is always the natural variation from the pitch (e.g. the classic Bell LBW Warne was just a legbreak that failed to grip)
Having said that, if you have a tasty variation, it's the sauce on the steak
lol, at least you got to see some bowling, I woke up and thought I had the wrong channel. Don't really want to be listening to Swann and Ponting with their purple ties so I'm going back to sleep.Can some one explain why i got up to watch this shit bowling ?
Ffs,
PITCH IT UP!!