Yeah, big wicket. Still could do with another one.Smith gone and things look a little healthier
9 overs to go, England could do with a few more wickets before close.
Handscome doesn't look convincing at all.
Didn't sound like England got a lot of luck but then you don't win the toss, field, and ask to rely on luck.
Another bad day at the office.
Don't reckon it was fear. I didn't see or listen to it but from what I'm reading, England's bowling in the first hour was really poor.I really hope he didn't choose to bowl out of fear - partly because that would suggest the wrong mindset and partly because it would make no sense. If your batting is weak, you don't elect to bat last.
I think that it was genuinely an attempt to seize the advantage - but the bowling misfired.
We'll probably have a better idea after both teams have had a bat. I still think the English batting is stronger overall than the Aussies. The Smith innings in the first test was the difference between the two sides and they might have gone on to lose the game. It was nip and tuck up to day 3.He looks more convincing than all of the English team aside from root and cook. The Aussies know if they get those two cheaply it’s game over. The Aussies aren’t a two horse side.
I can understand to a degree his thinking, it's just that the team didn't really execute. The needed to hit the ground running but didn't really get into any rhythm until after the rain break.Absurd decision by a captain who’s finding his feet. Refusing to bat at three is also bizarre. Some inventive field placements though.
Oh dear.. I think Root might be having a few sleepless nights over 'we'll have a bowl'!!
3-1 Aus. Maybe 4-1.