Spion
I hear ya
The report is online now. http://www.mossawacenter.org/files/...08/Mossawa HR report 2008 update Nov 2008.pdfI think you need to prove your case that it's accurate.
I look forward to your expose!
The report is online now. http://www.mossawacenter.org/files/...08/Mossawa HR report 2008 update Nov 2008.pdfI think you need to prove your case that it's accurate.
http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=3399764&postcount=40Demosthenes said:Have you ever been to Israel?
Such quick resort to ad homs makes plain you lack anything of substance to contributeThough to be honest I'm surprised. I don't really understand how people can have gone to Israel and developed as onesided a view of the situation as you have,
But then I noticed earlier that you're not very good at critical thinking.
What does working, visiting or living in Israel have to do with whether comparisons to Bantustans in S.A. during APartheid era are accurate or no?Well I don't know if that means you've been or not, - I presume it means you have.?
If you have, how can you possibly defend the view that Israel is run like South Africa? How can you make out that there's a right side and a wrong side?
Though to be honest I'm surprised. I don't really understand how people can have gone to Israel and developed as onesided a view of the situation as you have,
But then I noticed earlier that you're not very good at critical thinking.
Because if you go, as say a kibbutz volunteer for eg, you more than likely don't go into Arab villages, you don't go into the West Bank.If you have, how can you possibly defend the view that Israel is run like South Africa? How can you make out that there's a right side and a wrong side?
What does working, visiting or living in Israel have to do with whether comparisons to Bantustans in S.A. during APartheid era are accurate or no?
This is spurious argument from you.
So, what, you have to have been to Israel to comment, and if you have and you still disagree you're not very good at critical thinking?
Did you go to apartheid South Africa?
No, and I expect my mental impression of what apartheid South Africa was like, formed by films like Cry Freedom, and various highly publicised news events is probably mainly quite inaccurate.
Answer the question. What does working, visiting or living in Israel have to do with whether comparisons to Bantustans in S.A. during APartheid era are accurate or no?
Also, be aware that you have veered off topic since there is no current link being made during this latest crisis in Gaza/Palestine to S. A., unless you know any different.
Similarly I have not been Israel. For that matter the time I spent in apartheid South Africa probably did not give me much of an impression of the actual state of affairs, given that I mostly was around white people who certainly didn't spend their time beating black servants etc and were mostly very pleasant and reasonable (apart from a couple of examples). That wouldn't at all prevent a comparison of the operation of the two states based on their actions and laws.
Utter toss. Only one side has driven 750,000 people from 550 villages, stolen thousands of farms and businesses, carried out wholesale murder and driven people from their country, then overrun those refugees again and occupied that land for 40-plus years. And now these people have the temerity to respond they kill 100 for every Israeli that is killed.
You're so full of shit.
I'd expect a great critical thinker like you to understand that one's own experiences with people are by nature only going to give a partial picture and that you can never understand a society without facts and figures on levels of wealth and its distribution, the major industries and who owns them, the ethnic and class breakdown of society and its effects on poverty, education achievement, housing, access to state jobs and funds etc.Do you think you know more about Britain than someone who's read a lot about british politics but has never been here, or does having experienced britain help you have a better understanding of british politics? Is it possible to really understand british politics if you've never visited britain and spoken to a variety of british people to find out about their perceptions. ?
Err, I mentioned them in the post you quoted.Again one side of the story.
What about the other side of the story? what about the attacks against israel?
Which they quite literally did. 750,000 Palestinians were driven from 550-ish villages and 100s of millions of dollars worth of businesses stolen in 1948-49 with further rounds taking place in the 50s and in 1967.You act as if Israel was created and then just went about systematically destroying their neighbours.?
Sorry, when was this? 1948 perhaps? Arab armies responded to the Zionist militias/IDF ethnically cleansing 750,000 Palestinians. 1956 perhaps? Ah, but this time it was Israel, the UK and France attacking Egypt unilaterrally. Maybe you mean 1967? Here again Israel attacked three Arab states simultaneously.All the while ignoring the attempts by those neighbours to destroy israel.
But have you read the account I posted earlier about the white farmer and his burned fields and his rage with the israeli police?
Yes; without context it isn't that informative though and, in any case, it wouldn't affect my perception of actual policies and actions of the Israeli government, because those are what they are and come from fairly solid sources like official records.
As it happens I don't compare the Israeli government to apartheid SA because I don't think it's terribly useful and there are significant differences in practice which just confuse the issue. That does not mean that it is an invalid comparison to look at, or that the Israeli government is not discriminatory.
Well actually it is very informative. It's informative that the arab villagers burned their jewish neighbour's fields, without fear of reprisals. It's informative that the jewish farmer employed someone continually to watch over those fields for fear they'd do this. And it's very informative that the israeli police weren't interested in and refused to investigate the jewish farmer's complaint, (because they knew he had a long history of problems with these neighbours,) and refused to take sides. Whereas a crucial element of a discriminatory state is a discriminatory police force.
tangentlama said:Answer the question. What does working, visiting or living in Israel have to do with whether comparisons to Bantustans in S.A. during APartheid era are accurate or no?
me said:Do you think you know more about Israel or about Britain.?
Do you think you know more about Britain than someone who's read a lot about british politics but has never been here, or does having experienced britain help you have a better understanding of british politics? Is it possible to really understand british politics if you've never visited britain and spoken to a variety of british people to find out about their perceptions. ?
Err, I mentioned them in the post you quoted.
Which they quite literally did. 750,000 Palestinians were driven from 550-ish villages and 100s of millions of dollars worth of businesses stolen in 1948-49 with further rounds taking place in the 50s and in 1967.
Sorry, when was this? 1948 perhaps? Arab armies responded to the Zionist militias/IDF ethnically cleansing 750,000 Palestinians. 1956 perhaps? Ah, but this time it was Israel, the UK and France attacking Egypt unilaterrally. Maybe you mean 1967? Here again Israel attacked three Arab states simultaneously.
So, when did these Arab states attempt to destroy Israel exactly?
....was the first in a series of wars fought between the newly declared State of Israel and its Arab neighbours in the long-running Arab-Israeli conflict.
What's your problem?
It's not that informative without context. What did this "burning" involve? What was he doing himself? Had he made an enemy of the local police? Who was actually burning his fields, was it an insurance fraud, did it happen at all? The basics, you know, like I'd ask about a farmer here who was complaining about his neighbours burning his fields.
And in the end it isn't that informative in terms of national politics because even if there are some odd local situations where actually, arabs get away with burning jewish neighbours' fields, in general we are quite well aware through numerous reports, all heavily sourced, that the converse - and worse - is considerably more likely.
He goes to Wikipedia on this issue. Jeez
I don't like the way you debate. You take the topic away to personal issues which don't have relevance. Your phrasing is tricky to grasp. It seems like you say I brought a subject (S. A comparisons) to this thread when it was you.
It is as though you are trying to say to urbanites who might wish to comment, that if they've never been, then your being twice trumps their being none, etc.
Everyone and anyone is free to comment and it will help if they have some knowledge of history of this conflict, but is not compulsory to have deep historical knowledge (but it really does help).
Of course it happened. I saw it with my own eyes, - no he hadn't made an enemy of the local police but he had a longstanding hostility with the local arab villagers, and by the sounds of it they'd been having a miniwar for years.
No you don't get numerous reports heavily sourced of the converse, not in Israel, you get them in the occupied territories Not having been to Israel, you skate over the difference as if it's irrelevant, without realising just how crucial it is.
You may not find it informative, I did. Maybe you're just lacking in insight.