Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Bitcoin discussion and news

I read that too and don’t see why these people shouldn’t get sympathy. They’re not the villains in any story are they, them and millions like them.
Looked at the website for the rehab clinic mentioned in there too, providing treatment for crypto addicts on the basis that it’s basically a really bad gambling addiction. Which makes sense.
 
While I have some sympathy for the addiction angle, I ultimately just see greed and it only goes so far.
Do you feel the same about people who buy lottery tickets? Idk I’ve changed my view now that it’s gone so completely ‘mainstream’, the people who’ve bought in this past couple of years are going to be the most clueless ones and it’s anyone now, I know two of them, totally not got any idea about any of it and not interested really but thought it would be better than 0.01 % in the bank. It’s anybody, it’s being marketed in daytime tv adverts.
 
Do you feel the same about people who buy lottery tickets? Idk I’ve changed my view now that it’s gone so completely ‘mainstream’, the people who’ve bought in this past couple of years are going to be the most clueless ones and it’s anyone now, I know two of them, totally not got any idea about any of it and not interested really but thought it would be better than 0.01 % in the bank. It’s anybody, it’s being marketed in daytime tv adverts.
I don’t think the 2 are directly comparable. I’d say most people buy a lottery ticket assuming they’re not going to win, and that it would be just that “one in a million” chance if they did. People got caught with crypto because they wanted 20 percent returns for doing nothing.
 
Do you feel the same about people who buy lottery tickets? Idk I’ve changed my view now that it’s gone so completely ‘mainstream’, the people who’ve bought in this past couple of years are going to be the most clueless ones and it’s anyone now, I know two of them, totally not got any idea about any of it and not interested really but thought it would be better than 0.01 % in the bank. It’s anybody, it’s being marketed in daytime tv adverts.
I know what you mean. I can totally see how people fall into it. Footballs all over it at the moment to. It's the spinners, marketers, predators and the evangelists who deserve all the criticism they get really.
 
I know what you mean. I can totally see how people fall into it. Footballs all over it at the moment to. It's the spinners, marketers, predators and the evangelists who deserve all the criticism they get really.

I think the thing with this stuff is that it doesn't just drag people into chucking their money at it, it turns them into those marketers and evangelists. One of those guys who lost everything is still giving it that 'digital gold' bullshit for example. It actively needs that because the hype and ability to suck in new people is the only value it has. So it's not as if that's an easy line to draw.
 
I know what you mean. I can totally see how people fall into it. Footballs all over it at the moment to. It's the spinners, marketers, predators and the evangelists who deserve all the criticism they get really.

Thing is though, there's regulatory frameworks in place for a lot of the gambling industry. They're not strong enough IMHO but as far as I'm aware, no-one's allowed to get Ray Winstone to jump on the side of a bus and say "Go orn - 'ave a flutter! Ya can't lose! It's a guaranteed win! Put all yet life savings in it, innit?" without actually being able to back that up.

Contrast that with the wilds of the internet and deregulated finance where lots of the people involved in the crypto community have been banging on in the way of an absurd betting ad for years now. Put some in, put it all in, you can't lose! 5% returns, 10% returns, 20% returns! It just keeps going up UP UP!!! Sell the car, sell the house, sell the kids! You'll be a hojillionaire any second! Don't delay or you could miss your chance to get AAAAALLLLLL the moneeeeeey!

Most people understand gambling and its risks to some level because it's been a factor in our society for longer than print. But if you can come up with some sufficiently new whizz-bang all singing, all dancing, it slices, it dices, it's got unlimited bid-offer spread broadbands, it's got self-diversificating internet commodities, they're open-ended yield rebalancing, tax-free web3 funbucks!!!! and with the help of novel language (or flat-out flim-flammery) alongside impenetrable jargon/mechanics, you can easily convince enough people that this is definitely not gambling somehow, and from then on simple human nature can do the rest.
 
I don't disagree. What's the difference between that and gambling on stocks though? Other than the fact that this appears to be more popular and a bit more linear so people don't see the risk compared to maybe buying shares. Obviously stocks are regulated too.

There was a really high profile football index thing recently where you "bet" on the form of players and they increased, or decreased in value. It plummeted and loads of people lost their money.

So much shite out there. I've known a few people "investing" and challenged them on it. Generally they aren't evangelical, but maybe that's because I'd already made my view clear.
 
If you own a share, you are a partial owner of an actual company doing actual things that make real profits, which you are entitled to a piece of. That’s what you’re getting when you buy a share — the right to a part of its profits. Companies do actually make money — famously so. Buying a share is therefore not a “gamble” at all. The expected return from the stream of profits is greater than zero, unlike a gamble.
 
If you own a share, you are a partial owner of an actual company doing actual things that make real profits, which you are entitled to a piece of. That’s what you’re getting when you buy a share — the right to a part of its profits. Companies do actually make money — famously so. Buying a share is therefore not a “gamble” at all. The expected return from the stream of profits is greater than zero, unlike a gamble.
Thanks that makes some sense. I'd say it's still a gamble mind. There's no guarantee there will be a profit and things change quickly.
 
Thanks that makes some sense. I'd say it's still a gamble mind. There's no guarantee there will be a profit and things change quickly.
There's no guarantee to any investment, but bitcoin is zero-sum. The only way you can make money out of it is if someone else comes in and wants to buy it at more than you paid for it, but as it doesn't actually do anything other than a very minimal number of transactions that can't increase cos of its inbuilt systemic limitations, there is no room for any growth in value other than through speculation. And given that it doesn't produce value - it just burns value through the mining - at some point, someone is going to lose. That's the only way you can make money - if someone else loses money.

My sympathy for people who want to make a load of money without doing anything is not unlimited. Grifters rely on greed to drag people in. If you didn't question the promise of huge returns, you have to take some responsibility when it all goes pear-shaped - did you not stop to think where the returns were coming from?
 
There's no guarantee to any investment, but bitcoin is zero-sum. The only way you can make money out of it is if someone else comes in and wants to buy it at more than you paid for it, but as it doesn't actually do anything other than a very minimal number of transactions that can't increase cos of its inbuilt systemic limitations, there is no room for any growth in value other than through speculation. And given that it doesn't produce value - it just burns value through the mining - at some point, someone is going to lose. That's the only way you can make money - if someone else loses money.

My sympathy for people who want to make a load of money without doing anything is not unlimited. Grifters rely on greed to drag people in. If you didn't question the promise of huge returns, you have to take some responsibility when it all goes pear-shaped - did you not stop to think where the returns were coming from?
I'm not defending Bitcoin either by the way, or saying it's anywhere near the same as investing I was mainly intrigued as I don't know about about investing.

I think I'll always have a lot of empathy for People that get drawn in by shit. I know they should have considered more, but I can see how it happens.
 
I know very little about investing. I have nothing to invest. But looking at what is actually being done in order to give you returns seems a pretty basic place to start to me.
People who struggle with gambling in particular aren't very well known for thinking that way are they?
 
If you own a share, you are a partial owner of an actual company doing actual things that make real profits, which you are entitled to a piece of. That’s what you’re getting when you buy a share — the right to a part of its profits. Companies do actually make money — famously so. Buying a share is therefore not a “gamble” at all. The expected return from the stream of profits is greater than zero, unlike a gamble.
anyone who bought shares in Netflix at the atart of the year are now down 70%.
Actual company doing actual things that...er... Aren't making profits.
Of course its a gamble.
 
anyone who bought shares in Netflix at the atart of the year are now down 70%.
Actual company doing actual things that...er... Aren't making profits.
Of course its a gamble.
Netflix made $1.6billion net profit in Q1 2022, they've been profitable for a good few years now.


That gives an underlying value to those shares even if Netflix aren't paying dividends yet. It's not like bitcoin which has little to no underlying value and no way of generating returns like shares do once they pay dividends.
 
anyone who bought shares in Netflix at the atart of the year are now down 70%.
Actual company doing actual things that...er... Aren't making profits.
Of course its a gamble.
It’s not about cherry-picking individual firms, though. Look:
London's bluechip index the FTSE 100 (^FTSE) is forecast to deliver a 4.2% dividends payout to shareholders this year, totalling £85bn ($101bn).

That figure is up from £78.5bn paid last year, and falls just shy of the record payment £85.2bn set in 2018, data from online investment platform AJ Bell suggests.

So, in brief, invest in the FTSE100 index and and hold it and you’ll make something like 4% return from your dividends, (which you can broadly expect to grow in line with inflation). Because companies make profits.

And how many of the companies typically make profits?

Of the 100 firms, 97 are expected to pay a dividend this year, compared to 91 in 2021 and 85 in 2020, as corporate confidence continues to return after the pandemic
Typically, about 90% of them in any year. So there will be some that don’t in any given year, but invest in the market as a whole and you don’t need to worry about that.

All from this article:


Now, volatility of share trading comes from trying to buy and sell, because individual share prices fluctuate (although only a fraction as much as Bitcoin’s does). But that’s really missing the point. The shares themselves generate value just by owning them, because they represent an ownership of the profit of companies. Buying and holding those shares isn’t a gamble in the way most people would understand the word. By contrast, ownership of Bitcoin represents nothing and provides zero value.
 
Last edited:
While it's obviously not the same as crypto, there has been a tendency for passive ETFs such as those offered by Vanguard to be talked up as essentially being like high interest savings accounts, rather than what they are, investments which can and do go up and down (although they are expected to be up in the long run). And the situation has been worse with tech stocks and ETFs, many of which do not even pay dividends, and have crashed massively recently.
 
Can’t disagree about tech stock ETFs. And in general, investment in a particular market segment obviously starts introducing the risk that this segment becomes obsolete
 
I'm not quite sure what the point is here tbh. I'm pretty sure no one has or would argue you can't lose money on stocks but kabbes is absolutely right about the difference in the fundamentals. And how many people have gone all in on leveraged ETFs in the way they have with crypto?
 
Netflix made $1.6billion net profit in Q1 2022, they've been profitable for a good few years now.


That gives an underlying value to those shares even if Netflix aren't paying dividends yet. It's not like bitcoin which has little to no underlying value and no way of generating ret

Wow, that's even worse than I thought.
The company's profit just lulls a potential investor into a false sense of security.
First thinking they can safely park their savings in a profitable company then bang, 70% wiped out in 6 months.
 
It’s not about cherry-picking individual firms, though. Look:


So, in brief, invest in the FTSE100 index and and hold it and you’ll make something like 4% return from your dividends, (which you can broadly expect to grow in line with inflation). Because companies make profits.

And how many of the companies typically make profits?


Typically, about 90% of them in any year. So there will be some that don’t in any given year, but invest in the market as a whole and you don’t need to worry about that.

All from this article:


Now, volatility of share trading comes from trying to buy and sell, because individual share prices fluctuate (although only a fraction as much as Bitcoin’s does). But that’s really missing the point. The shares themselves generate value just by owning them, because they represent an ownership of the profit of companies. Buying and holding those shares isn’t a gamble in the way most people would understand the word. By contrast, ownership of Bitcoin represents nothing and provides zero value.
OK, but that sounds a lot like the old adage, it's the time in the market, not timing the market.

So help me understand this correctly* if someone had lumped their saving on the FTSE100 at the height of the dot-com bubble in 1999, they'd have seen their savings crash 50% within a year. They would then have had to wait until 2008 for the value of their savings to have recovered, only to see the goddammned market crash again that year wiping out 50% of their savings again. Then, after waiting another six years their savings would have finally recovered to their original value.

That's 14 years in the red but they would be getting 4% per year dividents, right?

My point is, that most people don't want to gamble on waiting 14 years for their savings to return to their original value, particularly with increasing inflation.


1657699125097.png

*Disclosure: I'm not an investor/ economist and don't really understand dividends. I don't advocate 'investing' in bitcoin or any other crypto. I do use bitcoin for small remittance payments.
 
The thing is, the stock market isn't really there to help your average person grow their savings is it? It's there to help people with significant capital grow their capital, and in general it does do that. Of course there's all sorts of issues with how embedded that is into the whole way our society is set up to benefit those people and there's plenty of discussion around the boards about those sorts of issues. The point about the comparison with crypto I think, again isn't 'look how brilliant the conventional system is' it's more that as always what crypto offers isn't a positive alternative it's something with whatever protections currently exist stripped away and the flaws turned up to eleven. 'Look at the issues with stock market investment for the average person' is fine but 'ergo replace it with outright gambling and massive fraud' isn't really.
 
I'm not quite sure what the point is here tbh. I'm pretty sure no one has or would argue you can't lose money on stocks but kabbes is absolutely right about the difference in the fundamentals. And how many people have gone all in on leveraged ETFs in the way they have with crypto?
The point is, that the number of retail investors boomed over the last couple of years, many of whom were fully leveraged into meme stocks (see 'stonks go up') causing an identical environment for the crypto investors.
For every Luna, there's a Theranos (down to 0%)
For every Bitcoin, there's a Tesla (down 50%)

If you'd have lumped on the profitable Netflix or Tesla at their height, you'd be down 50% regardless of how great you think the "fundamentals" are.

eta: I fully agree with your subsequent post (re stock market favouring big capital) which obvs makes this post of mine pointless
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom