And this is a dishonest dig as well. Supporting NATO aiding Ukraine against an invasion by an aggressively revanchist far-right political movement with global reach and whose victory has worrying implications for the world is obviously analogous with supporting British or French resistance to Nazi Germany and doesn't require being a fan of NATO or European imperialism. You are being knowingly disingenuous; maybe reflect on why this is.
so, the russians do some bombing, the ukrainians shoot some down, the russians who now know the location of said air defence decide not to destroy them with the multiple weapons they have on hand ready and waiting to do so and decide to avoid them instead? drop their bombs somewhere else?
I mean it's mostly just inaccurate, as I've been quite clear throughout this thread on my position about Nato, and if anything I'm less complementary about its capabilities and reach than he is. Afaik I've never had any positive words for it on here or anywhere else.
It's both. He knows perfectly well you aren't actually a lover of NATO.
the russian border is about a hundred km from avdiivka. so with a 70km range, they arent miles inside russia. unless you are counting donetsk as russian territory now?
Are you sure this is what you meant to say?
typo. edited.
no. now edited.
no fucking shit sherlock.
is the words too big? why not go back to weird sexual fantasies on the kate middleton thread if you cant keep up.
they have a targeting computer that tells them where to fly, at what angle and rate and when to release.
tell you what, give it a try and report back with your results.
yes, that is obviously what i was doing.
not rahnd eya owd chum.
