Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

So cash-wise, this means both the US and EU billions are on hold - I do wonder how long Ukraine can hold it's war economy together while the bickering goes on.
The FT had an answer to that, I posted a few days ago - in case you didnt see it....

"The financial pressures facing Ukraine are immense — and relentless. The government uses all of its tax revenues to cover defence spending — amounting to about half of its public expenditure. While Ukraine has received nearly $100bn worth of weapons and military training, it also needs foreign aid to pay for the government, public services, pensions and benefits. This requires $41bn in external financing next year, according to the budget passed by parliament last month.

It was counting on $18bn from the EU, $8.5bn from the US, $5.4bn from the IMF, $1.5bn from other development banks and $1bn from the UK. Kyiv is still negotiating with other partners, such as Japan and Canada. Although some of the required money will be paid whatever happens in Washington or Brussels, Kyiv needs cash to start flowing next month. If it fails to come through and Kyiv cannot borrow enough domestically, it may have to resort to monetary financing by the central bank, which could unleash hyperinflation and put financial stability at risk."

...report I read this morning suggests EU may well get the money together in January, which seems about how long Ukraine can hold out....US money even less clear
 
So cash-wise, this means both the US and EU billions are on hold - I do wonder how long Ukraine can hold it's war economy together while the bickering goes on.
Not so long, I suspect, with the ruinous interest rate on many of the loans kyiv has taken out - not to mention the need to pay the public sector etc as ska points out
 
Going back to the EU/Ukraine decisions. The agreement on Ukraine joining due to Orban's abstention was described as "An EU official, who insisted on not being quoted by name because the summit negotiations were private, said Mr Orban was "momentarily absent from the room in a pre-agreed and constructive manner" when the decision was made."

However, the budget proposal for aid to Ukraine fell due to Orban's veto . The budget will be discussed again in January so plenty of time for Christmas presents to be found under the tree.
 
ISW two latest publications on the russian invasion are of interest ...

A significant chunk of the 14th December situation report covered Putin's "Direct Line" and annual press conference.
He repeated his maximalist aims and other 'boilerplate' rhetoric, including a desire for regime change in Kyiv.

The previous publication is also worth reading.
An assessment why "the west" and the USA can't afford for russia to "win" by occupying the whole of Ukraine.
 
As for Alex Jones, he's a bit loud and hyper for my liking, that's not to diss him, him and Tucker Carlson (also someone I get a vague bad feeling about) talked about Alex predicting 9/11
As I say though, not stating facts, just putting this out there.

You've fallen a long way down that rabbit hole. We'll need to send down ferrets to rescue you.
 
Like Gollum without the ring.

🤣
Hopefully you're not far from Mount Doom.

In the meantime, where do you stand on the ongoing conflict, btw?

Should Ukraine accept its fate and cede territory to Putin? Is its upcoming membership of the EU a bad idea? Will Joe Biden be punished for starting a war?
 
No, no, no
Instead of quoting pop songs, perhaps you might wish to discuss the actual topic. Or does your hatred for the site prevent you from getting involved?

You're an absolute wrong un, for sure, but am giving you the benefit of the doubt that's it's not all venom and self loathing and that you have something to say...

How about it?
 
Instead of quoting pop songs, perhaps you might wish to discuss the actual topic. Or does your hatred for the site prevent you from getting involved?

You're an absolute wrong un, for sure, but am giving you the benefit of the doubt that's it's not all venom and self loathing and that you have something to say...

How about it?
Of course he has something to say. It's just shit and not worth the reading.
 
If they stopped doing so, would Russia still be able to fight the war?
Drones supplied by Iran made a big difference when Russia was on the back foot, driven back in the north-east and Kherson. The use of these drones meant air defence was required in cities (while they attacked civilian energy infrastructure) preventing Ukraine from being deployed near the front lines. Just in terrorising the population alone they have been valuable - think about the WW2 use of V1/V2s by Germany as a similar scenario.

The North Korean shells (at least a million supplied) has changed the situation on the front line - Russia relies heavily on artillery and had expended most of their stock - they went to NK because they needed to, while domestic production is increased (they’re now spending 15% of GDP on this war, a similar level of expenditure to the USSR just before collapse). This is how they’ve been making small advances over the last couple of months, while Ukraine faces a shortage and has to ration strikes. The only minor silver lining is that the quality of the NK stuff is very mixed, affecting accuracy and in worst (or best) scenarios causing barrel explosions on artillery.

Without this aid, I suspect things would not have been so good. Putin has an election next year, and while nobody expects that to be a particularly balanced affair, he’s still cautious and avoiding another general mobilisation, right now they are using mercenaries from Nepal and reportedly China to bolster troop numbers.
 
Russia is also sourcing what is often just cannon fodder from prisons and the pool of mainly east Asian migrant labour.

also [e2a] if it isn't already noticeable, Russian artillery will be becoming increasingly inaccurate as a result of bore wear.
 
Russia is also sourcing what is often just cannon fodder from prisons and the pool of mainly east Asian migrant labour.

also [e2a] if it isn't already noticeable, Russian artillery will be becoming increasingly inaccurate as a result of bore wear.
But they will expand their industrial capacity to prosecute war, and in time this will help them. NK ammo is a stop-gap to allow this to come online. Despite sanctions, they still have decent amount of money coming in, China and India are funding them via oil purchases and that’s not likely to change. They’re not stupid, they will adapt to the circumstances and innovate which will put them ahead of many other countries in experience of war. The worry should be what they do with this next.
 
Back
Top Bottom