Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

He is their leader. The last two years would not have gone in the direction it has other than for his leadership. His maximalist demands were always startling. I haven’t seen reports of him scaling down. Have you?

I think its worth considering the events in the Istanbul peace talks where a number of sources clearly indicate that the Ukrainian delegation had negotiated the makings of a potential agreement with the Russians or at least something to consider. Perhaps there were doubts, perhaps it wouldn't have been good enough, however, it seems that their decision making process was heavily influenced by both Johnson's and the US's feedback and advice. Johnson even flew in to give his view face to face and to make his case.
 
Possibly true, but Peter Dow, who in reality would make a pretty shite terrorist, got prosecuted and convicted for his fantasies about the assassination of the Queen. So, it's probably better to err on the side of caution when making wishes in public forums


tbf he was a major pain in the arse of several websites and worked really really hard to be seen as a threat to the establishment:D
 
He is their leader. The last two years would not have gone in the direction it has other than for his leadership. His maximalist demands were always startling. I haven’t seen reports of him scaling down. Have you?
Yes, in fact he offered not to join Nato within weeks of the war starting, but his personal views are not driving the continuation of this conflict (let's be honest here, his "maximalist demands" have been primarily hot air for domestic consumption - no wannabe Churchill is going to start with "let's fight for a slightly less thumping loss lads") and you've acknowledged as much in this very thread. So I ask again, why are you obsessing about him specifically? Do you think the logics change if the general takes over instead?
 
Last edited:
Yes, in fact he offered not to join Nato within weeks of the war starting, but his personal views are not driving the continuation of this conflict (let's be honest here, his "maximalist demands" have been primarily hot air for domestic consumption - no wannabe Churchill is going to start with "let's fight for a slightly less thumping loss lads") and you've acknowledged as much in this very thread. So I ask again, why are you obsessing about him specifically? Do you think the logics change if the general takes over instead?
I don't think Churchill is a particularly good comparison tho it's worth noting z did fly to Argentina and congratulate the new far right president there. He seems to have a peculiar affinity for right wing populists
 
Don't piss off the Ukrainians :eek:

This hasn't really been reported anywhere vaguely reputable or taken up by newspapers so I suspect it's bollocks.
 
This hasn't really been reported anywhere vaguely reputable or taken up by newspapers so I suspect it's bollocks.
Yahoo News and msn carry it, cybernews and SCMedia and a couple of others do too although I've not heard of any of them before.

But yes they all got it from the same source so apologies if it is indeed bollocks :(
 
This hasn't really been reported anywhere vaguely reputable or taken up by newspapers so I suspect it's bollocks.
ISW reported it on 12thDec - it's in the "topline text" as the 7th section ...


As far as I can see,, it was Not retracted on the 13th.
 
I don't think Churchill is a particularly good comparison tho it's worth noting z did fly to Argentina and congratulate the new far right president there. He seems to have a peculiar affinity for right wing populists
Just as well I didn't compare him to Churchill then. And yes, of course Zelensky is happy to talk to right-wing populists, this is hardly surprising.
 
Just as well I didn't compare him to Churchill then. And yes, of course Zelensky is happy to talk to right-wing populists, this is hardly surprising.
Well, of course it isn't - if he wants material such as ammunition or F-16s or tanks he has to talk to the decision-makers.
 
I don't think Churchill is a particularly good comparison tho it's worth noting z did fly to Argentina and congratulate the new far right president there. He seems to have a peculiar affinity for right wing populists
Shame the right wing populists like Trump, Bolsonaro, Orban or Putin don't have an affinity for him, as it might bring the war to an end sooner.
 
What’s his stated strategic goal now?
To evict the Russians from Ukraine and get some compensation. But the whole depose Putin thing was quietly nixed well over a year ago. Probably someone US side had a word about "Yeah, that's not gonna happen, we don't support that, in fact we prefer Putin to the alternatives."
 
I wonder what they had on Orban to force him off the veto.

Apparently 10 billion euros, not on him but on them which they gave to him yesterday. The funds had been withheld due to concerns about the judiciary in Hungary. However, Hungary have , as it happens, turned things around and everything is ok now. "We have received sufficient guarantees to say that independence of the judiciary will be strengthened in Hungary," said Didier Reynders, the European Commissioner for Justice.
 
No sure on the truth of this, can't link to the vid as it was embedded in twitter, Alex Jones says on Clayton Morris's podcast, NATO mobilising for war on Russia.
I read that Clayton has had scandal with properties.
As for Alex Jones, he's a bit loud and hyper for my liking, that's not to diss him, him and Tucker Carlson (also someone I get a vague bad feeling about) talked about Alex predicting 9/11
As I say though, not stating facts, just putting this out there.
 
No sure on the truth of this, can't link to the vid as it was embedded in twitter, Alex Jones says on Clayton Morris's podcast, NATO mobilising for war on Russia.
I read that Clayton has had scandal with properties.
As for Alex Jones, he's a bit loud and hyper for my liking, that's not to diss him, him and Tucker Carlson (also someone I get a vague bad feeling about) talked about Alex predicting 9/11
As I say though, not stating facts, just putting this out there.
He's a grifter shitbag. Don't want to derail but you are better avoiding Jones completely.
 
A comparison to Churchill would suggest he has aspects in common. Calling him a wannabe Churchill only implies that he'd like to.
Yeh. Have a pedant point, he doesn't want to be like him for the obvious reason that one core aspect of Churchill was that he aspired to be a career politician from a very early age. You appear to aspire to be like me, a much worthier aim.
 
Back
Top Bottom