existentialist
Tired and unemotional
It must be a FOTL thing. I'm surprised they don't capitalise it too.Why do they keep spelling 'Noam' 'Naom'?
It must be a FOTL thing. I'm surprised they don't capitalise it too.Why do they keep spelling 'Noam' 'Naom'?
Why do they keep spelling 'Noam' 'Naom'?
Fear of the Lord?It must be a FOTL thing. I'm surprised they don't capitalise it too.
Fear of the Lord?
Festival of the Lost?
Fall off the Toilet Laughing?
All of the aboveFear of the Lord?
Festival of the Lost?
Fall off the Toilet Laughing?
Not quite. Some of the UPA and other Ukrainian partisans were fighting both the Nazi's and the USSRAnyone fighting against the USSR between the years 1939 - 1945 was a Nazi
in many places the nazis had access to census data - or organised censuses themselves - using ibm machines to do the analysis and help them root out jews IBM and the Holocaust — why wasn’t this on my radar? | Glencora Borradaile the book is well worth readingThey knew who the Jews were, they knew where they lived, they knew those who had communist sympathies
They're lucky in that Slovakia has pretty much already donated everything that they possibly can, so losing their support doesn't amount to much.Interesting article on waning support. Electoral politics begin to bite into Ukraine support
Decent quotes from involved people.
Well, this settles the PC vs Mac debate.in many places the nazis had access to census data - or organised censuses themselves - using ibm machines to do the analysis
you do come out with a load of auld bollocks, more than can be explained simply by ignorant stupidityWell, this settles the PC vs Mac debate.
They're lucky in that Slovakia has pretty much already donated everything that they possibly can, so losing their support doesn't amount to much.
The US is obviously a lot more worrying, but there is still a lot of stuff hiding out in warehouses that's basically zero-cost to donate once it's been shipped. The US Army has made a killing getting rid of things they were going to have to pay to dispose of properly - it's cheaper to let the Ukrainians blow it all up.
That's a really superficial post because it fails to take nato's consensus approach into account https://www.nato.int/wearenato/how-are-decisions-taken-nato.html so Slovakia taking a new line on Ukraine could be more important than you suggestThey're lucky in that Slovakia has pretty much already donated everything that they possibly can, so losing their support doesn't amount to much.
The US is obviously a lot more worrying, but there is still a lot of stuff hiding out in warehouses that's basically zero-cost to donate once it's been shipped. The US Army has made a killing getting rid of things they were going to have to pay to dispose of properly - it's cheaper to let the Ukrainians blow it all up.
I'm not so terribly worried about that because the Americans (and to some degree the Brits, the French) have proven that they'll happily bribe anyone who stands in the way of what they want in NATO. Slovakia just donated all of their MiGs to Ukraine and are waiting on F-16s to replace them. Production delays have pushed them well back into 2024, but they could easily get some tomorrow if the Americans are willing to let one squadron go under-strength for a year. It might even be what the real plan of the new government was in the first place, choosing to ride a wave of populist nonsense to get there. Turkey constantly throws a tantrum to get new toys.That's a really superficial post because it fails to take nato's consensus approach into account https://www.nato.int/wearenato/how-are-decisions-taken-nato.html so Slovakia taking a new line on Ukraine could be more important than you suggest
you think this is all about supplying weapons to ukraine?I'm not so terribly worried about that because the Americans (and to some degree the Brits, the French) have proven that they'll happily bribe anyone who stands in the way of what they want in NATO. Slovakia just donated all of their MiGs to Ukraine and are waiting on F-16s to replace them. Production delays have pushed them well back into 2024, but they could easily get some tomorrow if the Americans are willing to let one squadron go under-strength for a year. It might even be what the real plan of the new government was in the first place, choosing to ride a wave of populist nonsense to get there. Turkey constantly throws a tantrum to get new toys.
Do you?you think this is all about supplying weapons to ukraine?
noDo you?
And executing Jews and Poles at the same time so very busyNot quite. Some of the UPA and other Ukrainian partisans were fighting both the Nazi's and the USSR
That's a really superficial post because it fails to take nato's consensus approach into account https://www.nato.int/wearenato/how-are-decisions-taken-nato.html so Slovakia taking a new line on Ukraine could be more important than you suggest
Sigh
Decision-making like it says in the postConsensus approach to what?
Sigh
Let me translate that post for you:
"Would you care to contribute any meaningful content on the subject instead of smug remarks? Because if you do that, I'm going to respond in kind, good and bad."
You've contributed a video on how NATO makes decisions, by which I've said NATO is the Americans getting what they want because they bribe anyone who doesn't agree with that. Then you've offered up some nonsense about whether it's all about weapons for Ukraine, which isn't even something I said.
It's essentially what you've said, in your post about a change of government in Slovakia not mattering much because they've sent all the weapons they might. For me your the yanks will bribe their way past any local difficulty is complacent. A new government in Slovakia less sympathetic to Ukraine could poke a stick in nato's spokes. maybe you've forgotten Turkey not taking bribes in 2003 and refusing use of their land to launch the planned northern invasion of Iraq, not everyone has tho.Sigh
Let me translate that post for you:
"Would you care to contribute any meaningful content on the subject instead of smug remarks? Because if you do that, I'm going to respond in kind, good and bad."
You've contributed a video on how NATO makes decisions, by which I've said NATO is the Americans getting what they want because they bribe anyone who doesn't agree with that. Then you've offered up some nonsense about whether it's all about weapons for Ukraine, which isn't even something I said.
Iraq wasn't a NATO policy. If France or Germany had shared a border in the area, they'd have refused too (pity the UK wouldn't have). It's totally irrelevant. Hungary is already far more pro-Russia than Slovakia and it's not made a lick of difference in NATO's policies. What exactly do you think it will change?It's essentially what you've said, in your post about a change of Slovakia not mattering much because they've sent all the weapons they might. For me your the yanks will bribe their way past any local difficulty is complacent. A new government in Slovakia less sympathetic to Ukraine could poke a stuck in nato's spokes. maybe you've forgotten Turkey not taking bribes in 2003 and refusing use of their land to launch the planned northern invasion of Iraq, not everyone has tho.
Decision-making like it says in the post
Fair pointWhy do they keep spelling 'Noam' 'Naom'?
Because Naom can say anything you like.Why do they keep spelling 'Noam' 'Naom'?