Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Don't blame everyone for bimble's low level of debateIf this is the level of debate I think I'll opt out.
Don't blame everyone for bimble's low level of debateIf this is the level of debate I think I'll opt out.
You're giving bimble a run for her money if this is the level of debate you think we should be at.If you don't think the Russian Federation would regard NATO on their borders as a threat then I have no idea why You're facepalming tbh.
Derailing you believing some alternate reality where NATO expansion played no role whatsoever?
Fucking hell. Tell me what the last 600 pages decided then.
If you read the thread you'll catch up with lots of things and the bit about zelensky's trip to the russian red light district is one of the highlightsDerailing you believing some alternate reality where NATO expansion played no role whatsoever?
Fucking hell. Tell me what the last 600 pages decided then.
Unfortunately I couldn't keep up with the thread in the early days. I said as much on this very thread. It's like a 24 hour rolling news channel on steroids.If you read the thread you'll catch up with lots of things and the bit about zelensky's trip to the russian red light district is one of the highlights
There are worse contributions than bimbleIf this is the level of debate I think I'll opt out.
I'm not taking Russia's side though. I think you're projecting things here.At least blaming Putin’s mum hasn’t been done ten thousand times before by weird performative ‘anti imperialist’ dudes on the internet, it’s my shit geopolitical theory and I’m sticking with it for today.
Mine?There are worse contributions than bimble
This is 2022. 2014 wants its argument back. We've done nato expansion to death and only rd2003 keeps banging on about it. Do you want to be the only other poster in rd2003's camp?Unfortunately I couldn't keep up with the thread in the early days. I said as much on this very thread. It's like a 24 hour rolling news channel on steroids.
But Putin HIMSELF stated NATO on his borders to justify the 2014 annexing of Crimea. And powers having neutral buffer countries are a normal state of the status quo.
Nope but he walks among usMine?
The rhineland was never not in Germany in the c20. The issue was that after ww1 it was demilitarised, until German troops moved into it in 1936a giving Hitler the rhineland stop his expansionist ideas
Take that Nato
*shakes fist at sky
I'm not in his camp. Why do you think China wants Taiwan out of interest? Why does it put up with DPRK? Why doesn't the US want Socialism on its borders?This is 2022. 2014 wants its argument back. We've done nato expansion to death and only rd2003 keeps banging on about it. Do you want to be the only other poster in rd2003's camp?
All the answers to those questions, and more, will be in my pay to listen podcast you can download for just a pound on the weekendI'm not in his camp. Why do you think China wants Taiwan out of interest? Why does it put up with DPRK? Why doesn't the US want Socialism on its borders?
It was a rhetorical question.All the answers to those questions, and more, will be in my pay to listen podcast you can download for just a pound on the weekend
Unfortunately I couldn't keep up with the thread in the early days. I said as much on this very thread. It's like a 24 hour rolling news channel on steroids.
But Putin HIMSELF stated NATO on his borders to justify the 2014 annexing of Crimea. And powers having neutral buffer countries are a normal state of the status quo.
I'm not justifying Russia's actions at all. But you clearly think that Russia wouldn't desire Ukraine as a buffer country (why?) despite them stating it as an objective!Do you even read what you've written?
If Putin is scared of having NATO on his borders, why has he massively depleted Russian forces from the Finnish border, from Kaliningrad, from the Estonian border and repositioned them in Ukraine?
Do you think that the UK, as a significant military power, has the right to require adjacent states to accept neutrality, or other political/military/economic statuses - regardless of their own preferences - because, err.. status quo?
What happened in Ireland btw?Do you think that the UK, as a significant military power, has the right to require adjacent states to accept neutrality, or other political/military/economic statuses - regardless of their own preferences - because, err.. status quo?
I'm not justifying Russia's actions at all. But you clearly think that Russia wouldn't desire Ukraine as a buffer country (why?) despite them stating it as an objective!
How do you know this?(((Putin may have been telling porkies, shocking I know)))
If you don't think the Russian Federation would regard NATO on their borders as a threat then I have no idea why You're facepalming tbh.
What happened in Ireland btw?
Not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing but it looks like the former...Don’t you understand. The only people with agency are white men from the UK or USA. Everyone else in the world is a childlike waif incapable of decisions. Get with the programme…
Careful now, pointing that out means you condone it.the English imported the worst type of Morris dancers
Orangemen