andysays
Love and solidarity
I noticed that.Orcas
Are the Russians using killer whales to guard their ammo dumps now?
I noticed that.Orcas
From Kevin Rothrock's telegram:
'"A thoughtful essay in Holod Media’s new English-language edition by human rights activist Almut Rochowanski where she argues against calls in Europe to ban tourist visas for Russians. In her own experience helping people flee the country, she says tourist and business visas were vital to getting Russians abroad safely or at all. “Humanitarian visas” are apparently nearly impossible to get without “tenacious allies with political connections” — in other words, the most vulnerable groups are pretty much fucked.
The tourist-visa application process itself, of course, is designed to keep out Russians who might want to stay in Europe. The whole point is to allow visitors to come, spend their money, and then leave. In other words, folks who can’t prove gainful employment, bank accounts, property, etc. are already discriminated against. In the context of political flight, this especially disadvantages applicants from the North Caucasus (particularly women).
Besides these logistical insights, Rochowanski also challenges advocacy that would base visa policymaking on what “offends” the public. Acknowledging the outrage people experience at the idea of Putin’s constituents lounging on foreign beaches, she argues that Europe’s increasingly xenophobic, prejudiced, right-wing ideologies are the context in which we ought to see the visa-ban campaign against Russians. Even if you’re unmoved by the fact that tourist visas are a lifeline to people fleeing Russia, Rochowanski says, Russians nevertheless “have a right not to be discriminated against and to due process.” That’s true, she adds, even though tourist visas themselves are not a right (they’re the product of evidence- and law-based decisions).
Ultimately, Europe simply has to stomach the “awkwardness” of remaining open to Russians during the Ukraine war: “It’s better than the alternative.”"
Another Russian war critic, Lukoil chairman Ravil Maganov, has died following a mysterious 'fall' from a window
Ravil Maganov: Russian Lukoil chief dies in 'fall from hospital window'
Lukoil boss Ravil Maganov is the latest Russian businessman to die in mysterious circumstances.www.bbc.co.uk
Another Russian war critic, Lukoil chairman Ravil Maganov, has died following a mysterious 'fall' from a window
Ravil Maganov: Russian Lukoil chief dies in 'fall from hospital window'
Lukoil boss Ravil Maganov is the latest Russian businessman to die in mysterious circumstances.www.bbc.co.uk
Another Russian war critic, Lukoil chairman Ravil Maganov, has died following a mysterious 'fall' from a window
Ravil Maganov: Russian Lukoil chief dies in 'fall from hospital window'
Lukoil boss Ravil Maganov is the latest Russian businessman to die in mysterious circumstances.www.bbc.co.uk
From Kevin Rothrock's telegram:
'"A thoughtful essay in Holod Media’s new English-language edition by human rights activist Almut Rochowanski where she argues against calls in Europe to ban tourist visas for Russians. In her own experience helping people flee the country, she says tourist and business visas were vital to getting Russians abroad safely or at all. “Humanitarian visas” are apparently nearly impossible to get without “tenacious allies with political connections” — in other words, the most vulnerable groups are pretty much fucked.
The tourist-visa application process itself, of course, is designed to keep out Russians who might want to stay in Europe. The whole point is to allow visitors to come, spend their money, and then leave. In other words, folks who can’t prove gainful employment, bank accounts, property, etc. are already discriminated against. In the context of political flight, this especially disadvantages applicants from the North Caucasus (particularly women).
Besides these logistical insights, Rochowanski also challenges advocacy that would base visa policymaking on what “offends” the public. Acknowledging the outrage people experience at the idea of Putin’s constituents lounging on foreign beaches, she argues that Europe’s increasingly xenophobic, prejudiced, right-wing ideologies are the context in which we ought to see the visa-ban campaign against Russians. Even if you’re unmoved by the fact that tourist visas are a lifeline to people fleeing Russia, Rochowanski says, Russians nevertheless “have a right not to be discriminated against and to due process.” That’s true, she adds, even though tourist visas themselves are not a right (they’re the product of evidence- and law-based decisions).
Ultimately, Europe simply has to stomach the “awkwardness” of remaining open to Russians during the Ukraine war: “It’s better than the alternative.”"
People die all the time in them. Believe me i work in one. Avoid like the plague.In the day of the triffids, they eye surgeon at the start of the book hoys himself out of a hospital window. Dangerous places them hospitals
From Kevin Rothrock's telegram:
'"A thoughtful essay in Holod Media’s new English-language edition by human rights activist Almut Rochowanski where she argues against calls in Europe to ban tourist visas for Russians. In her own experience helping people flee the country, she says tourist and business visas were vital to getting Russians abroad safely or at all. “Humanitarian visas” are apparently nearly impossible to get without “tenacious allies with political connections” — in other words, the most vulnerable groups are pretty much fucked.
The tourist-visa application process itself, of course, is designed to keep out Russians who might want to stay in Europe. The whole point is to allow visitors to come, spend their money, and then leave. In other words, folks who can’t prove gainful employment, bank accounts, property, etc. are already discriminated against. In the context of political flight, this especially disadvantages applicants from the North Caucasus (particularly women).
Besides these logistical insights, Rochowanski also challenges advocacy that would base visa policymaking on what “offends” the public. Acknowledging the outrage people experience at the idea of Putin’s constituents lounging on foreign beaches, she argues that Europe’s increasingly xenophobic, prejudiced, right-wing ideologies are the context in which we ought to see the visa-ban campaign against Russians. Even if you’re unmoved by the fact that tourist visas are a lifeline to people fleeing Russia, Rochowanski says, Russians nevertheless “have a right not to be discriminated against and to due process.” That’s true, she adds, even though tourist visas themselves are not a right (they’re the product of evidence- and law-based decisions).
Ultimately, Europe simply has to stomach the “awkwardness” of remaining open to Russians during the Ukraine war: “It’s better than the alternative.”"
Such are the brutish realities of being invaded by an aggressor.Ukraine’s first lady, Olena Zelenska, has said in a BBC interview that while the economic impact of the war in Ukraine is tough on its allies, Britons “count pennies” while Ukrainians “count casualties”.
My take was more, on the day the gas was shut off she said, stop moaning.Such are the brutish realities of being invaded by an aggressor.
Well, you have your lens that you view all this through.My take was more, on the day the gas was shut off she said, stop moaning.
Given the context, she's got a point.My take was more, on the day the gas was shut off she said, stop moaning.
With a government like the one we have you have to look after the pennies and pray the pounds will take care of themselvesUkraine’s first lady, Olena Zelenska, has said in a BBC interview that while the economic impact of the war in Ukraine is tough on its allies, Britons “count pennies” while Ukrainians “count casualties”.
Whilst she may well believe the economic impact on allies to be true and it is, in part so it is in fact a misleading narrative. The economic woes being experienced particularly here in the UK have a whole host of other, larger reasons, greed and Brexit being on the list.Ukraine’s first lady, Olena Zelenska, has said in a BBC interview that while the economic impact of the war in Ukraine is tough on its allies, Britons “count pennies” while Ukrainians “count casualties”.
Certainly she has a point. However how does it go down in Europe for the Ukrainian President’s wife to utter such a statement from a gilded stateroom?Given the context, she's got a point.
What point is that? The point that you have interpreted through your solipsistic lens? I think her emphasis is on the casualties of her own country, not the economics of a different one. It’s you that is only choosing to hear the latter part.Certainly she has a point. However how does it go down in Europe for the Ukrainian President’s wife to utter such a statement from a gilded stateroom?
I hear the whole thing. But my question remains.What point is that? The point that you have interpreted through your solipsistic lens? I think her emphasis is on the casualties of the own country, not the economics of a different one. It’s you that is only choosing to hear the latter part.
What question? Why is she making a point that only exists in your mind, you mean? Nobody can answer that.I hear the whole thing. But my question remains.
Perhaps some people are more able to see beyond the statecraft and appreciate the message.Certainly she has a point. However how does it go down in Europe for the Ukrainian President’s wife to utter such a statement from a gilded stateroom?
The country has been invaded and citizens tortured and killed. But the president's wife is in a position of privilege so on the scale of economic privilege she is a hypocrite? Something like that?I hear the whole thing. But my question remains.
Very well I would imagine. I would think that about 85% of Europeans would think to themselves 'She's got a point there, thank god we aren't facing an invasion by a brutal kleptocratic dictatorship with no regard for human rights and it feels bad the Ukrainians are taking the brunt of the violence and death whilst we are just struggling economically."I hear the whole thing. But my question remains.