Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

A few weeks back, we had a fairly large pro-Ukraine protest/solidarity event on site.

Today I was over to where we held it and some fucker has been round grafttiing "Z"s all over the venue. Which with two of my Ukranian colleagues present, did not go down at all well.

In the half hour before today's event started and until they can get the painters-in next week, the boss gave us permission to obliterate/deface the Zs in any way we wanted.

The other bit of good news from him is that he managed to find a way to get all fees waived for all our Ukranian students/postgrads and the money will be coming back to them soon. Which is a very palpable act of support.
 
About that port blockade:



Could be some more wrecks to dive.

It is also reported that Ukraine has been badgering the US for longer range missiles, but that the US is reluctant to provide these over fears they will be used to strike deeper into Russia and cause escalation.
Now's the time for the United Nations to have more of a role and escort whatever food Ukraine and Russia have left of their exports to a hungry world and maybe shift the dialogue.
Ukraine war has stoked global food crisis that could last years, says UN
 
'think' may be overstating things a little.

You know a rorschach inkblot test? I think when truss wipes her arse and checks the paper to see if it's clean yet, that's where she gets her inspiration. I hear it was recommended by cummings but who knows.
Well I thought most all of her waffelling was shit so youve definitely got a plausible theory
 
An interesting take by Olga Chyzh (assistant professor in the Dept of Political Science at U Toronto, where she researches political violence and repressive regimes) who reckons Putin & co are unaffected by the outcome of war or sanctions, and simply tighten their hold on the tools of power and stifle opposition.
 
An interesting take by Olga Chyzh (assistant professor in the Dept of Political Science at U Toronto, where she researches political violence and repressive regimes) who reckons Putin & co are unaffected by the outcome of war or sanctions, and simply tighten their hold on the tools of power and stifle opposition.
Yeah. In Iraq and North Korea sanctions were accompanied by greater totalitarianism. Regimes going into survival mode I guess.
 
Yeah. In Iraq and North Korea sanctions were accompanied by greater totalitarianism. Regimes going into survival mode I guess.
and the kermiln announced to the world they would do just that, preinvasion, saying theyd done it before in the cold war and could do it again
 
Some of you probably already follow Dmitri on Twitter, https://twitter.com/mdmitri91

He’s been translating loads of Russian stuff, intercepted communications, TV broadcasts etc. Always pretty interesting stuff and gives an idea of the Russian perspective.

The last few days he’s been translating in segments the writings of a Russian volunteer soldier, which details life at the front on their side, corruption and incompetence, plus a hatred of the enemy. Up to the fourth segment of five today, follow the link below and it has links back to the earlier segments to read.

 
Do they? I say this because there seems to be a bit of a lack of statements from them saying that.
They're being cautious with their public statements, but that doesn't mean they want to be invaded. If some Nato countries are discussing sending them arms, wouldn't you expect Moldova to be involved in those discussions? And why would a poor country under threat of invasion reject an offer of free military assistance?
 
Ukrainians responding to calls for Ukraine to cede territory.
Andriy Zagorodnyuk: 'Those saying Ukraine can't win don't understand the situation'
A New York Times editorial article titled “The War in Ukraine Is Getting Complicated, and America Isn’t Ready,” published on May 19, immediately triggered a stir in Ukraine and beyond.

Coming from a media outlet that has the reputation of being supportive of U.S. assistance to Ukraine against Russia’s invasion, it has surprised many.

The New York Times, following the U.S. Senate’s historic approval of $40 billion in assistance for Kyiv, said it was not “in America’s best interest to plunge into an all-out war with Russia.”

Even though Russia’s attack, the biggest in Europe since World War II, has been “surprisingly sloppy,” the board said, Russia remains too strong and Ukraine’s decisive victory is not a realistic plan.

The assumption came despite the fact that over the previous two months of war, Russia had sustained a range of serious defeats, having to completely withdraw from northern Ukraine and concentrate its active campaign in the eastern region of Donbas, where the Russian offensive also ended up being extremely costly and slow.

The article criticized the U.S. and NATO for being involved in rendering assistance to Ukraine’s “unrealistic expectations” of defending itself against foreign aggression that could draw the West into an “ever deeper into a costly, drawn-out war.”

Therefore, according to the New York Times, Ukraine “will have to make the painful territorial decisions that any compromise (with Russia) will demand.”

Moreover, the newspaper insisted that its suggestion to bow down to a foreign aggressor’s gargantuan claims against Ukraine’s integrity, security, democracy, and independence, is not an act of appeasement.

The editorial partly echoed the position of the Russian leadership, which has repeatedly demanded that the West immediately stopped providing assistance to Ukraine, which plays an important role in Russia’s military failures.

In the wake of all the backlash about the editorial, the Kyiv Independent asked Ukraine’s former defense minister, director of the Kyiv-based Center for Defense Strategies Andriy Zagorodnyuk, whether Ukraine really can’t prevail over Russia.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom