ruffneck23
front left
Hope this is real...
Who seriously thinks "2014 boundries" didn't come from an invasion? By all rights Ukraine shouldn't have to or be expected to allow Russia to grab whatever land they want.
the ukrainians have admitted to heavy - tho unspecified - lossesIirc even Zelesnky (recently) was talking about withdrawal to 2014 boundaries as a start point to reopening negotiations. Clearly he's not looking to justify the 2014 invasion... My point there was just that this isn't what Johnson was talking about (far as I can tell)... That was with reference to Ukraine requesting heavy weapons, which they justified in terms of needing counter-battery fire etc to move to retake areas occupied in the current invasion. People have grown to expect a lot from the Ukrainian armed forces, but even their current counter-attacks are likely challenging and costly.
I think the losses are going to be hugely greater than that, perhaps even on a par with Russian losses. There's a lot we just aren't going to know until a long time afterwards, war being what it is.Yeah... Even mid April Zelensky admitted 2,500-3,000 dead with 10,000 injured, and iirc heavy losses statement was after that. War is shit.
I think the losses are going to be hugely greater than that, perhaps even on a par with Russian losses. There's a lot we just aren't going to know until a long time afterwards, war being what it is.
Ukraine has pushed well past Kharkiv, and is forcing the Russians back almost to their border with Ukraine. The more I see of this, even allowing for bias on my part, and a tendency for Ukrainian good news to be more available than Russian good news, the Ukrainian forces seem to have met the clodhopping, doctrinaire and hierarchical Russian military with a kind of flair and flourish that regularly leaves their opponents floundering. Of course, it's quite possible that these counterattacks are being facilitated by some of the Western artillery on its way in (bet your bottom dollar that whatever public pronouncements these nations are making about timelines, the reality will be shorter, for various political and operational reasons), so perhaps those M777s, and those monster French truck-mounted artillery pieces are starting to do their thing. Either way, Russia is looking pretty comprehensively flat-footed - the only advantage they have is sheer force of numbers, and that's being massively hampered by equipment failure, materiel shortages, and seriously poor morale.
Oh, it's definitely optimistic.Yeah of course, that is the absolutely most er... optimistic?... assessment, given who it comes from and how long ago it was.
TBH, I think they are busier elsewhere.Why haven't they used artillery to push back the Mariupol attackers?
Interesting, assuming someone hasn't purposefully miskeyed a UAV.
Not much of a spy plane if everyone knows where it is!It's a spyplane for intercepting radio communications, jfi.
Ukraine doesn't have artillery anywhere close to being within range of Mariupol - it's absolutely miles from the front linesWhy haven't they used artillery to push back the Mariupol attackers?
Rivet Joint has a wider ELINT role than just comms intercepts, characterising signals and geolocating them. But the point was more about [anticipated] air defence and messaging (heretofore being primarily active over PL/SK/HU/RO airspace).It's a spyplane for intercepting radio communications, jfi.
Not much of a spy plane if everyone knows where it is!
Interesting, assuming someone hasn't purposefully miskeyed a UAV.
its a common thing, even the US global hawk drone broadcasts it postion, which can be picked up by sites like flightradar24. If things got dangerous for the US, perhaps they might turn off this signal and use drones which are stealthy.
interesting that Putin did not feel able to set the whole country on a war footing (or wave his nukes about) - which maybe demonstrates two tentatively assuring factsKey Takeaways:
- Russian President Vladimir Putin used his May 9 speech to praise ongoing Russian efforts in Ukraine and reinforce existing Kremlin framing rather than announcing a change. He did not announce an escalation or declare victory in the Russian war in Ukraine.
- Putin likely calculated that he could not ask the Russian population for a greater commitment to the war effort and implicitly reassured the Russian people that he would not ask for a greater societal commitment in his speech.
- Putin may be recognizing the growing risks he faces at home and in Ukraine and may be adjusting his objectives, and his desired end state in Ukraine, accordingly.
- The Kremlin has already scaled down its objectives in Ukraine (from its initial objective of capturing Kyiv and full regime change) and will likely do so again—or be forced to do so by Ukrainian battlefield successes.
- Regardless of any change—or lack thereof—in the Kremlin's objectives, Putin’s speech indicates that the Kremlin has likely decided to maintain its current level of resourcing in the war.
- The Kremlin attempted to demonstrate the alleged popularity of its occupation of eastern Ukraine through forced Victory Day celebrations in occupied Ukrainian territories.
Prescient.