Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

If I was a ruthless dictator on a sticky wicket and needed something to rouse my restive population and get them back on side I think I could do worse than use chemical weapons and for the lives of a few score unprotected soldiers use the belief you outline to plausibly paint my opponents as prepared to deploy and use chemical weapons. It wouldn't really matter to me if this was widely believed in the west. A missile strike on the site of the attack could remove inconvenient witnesses and be doctored to look like a Ukrainian facility for domestic consumption
Well I did only say it was a bit reassuring... Just a bit....
 
Analysis of possible outcomes by a Chinese policy thinker. Worth a read:


That's a good read. Apparently it has been scrubbed from the Chinese Internet already though.

There's quite a few signs that sections of the Chinese elite are unhappy with Xi destroying relations with the west. The recommendation in that article of reducing tensions with the US to avoid sanctions is unlikely to be followed, however - Xi has built up his loyal support base by promoting hot headed nationalists and it would be difficult to reel them in at this point.

It does increase the likelihood of a coup against Xi though. The 20th National Congress of the Communist Party is later this year and will be when Xi formally starts his third term. It is possible that they may be some intrigue during this time.
 
Or compromising more and joining the Ukrainian military as they have the most chance of enabling a better outcome for people in the short to medium term?
Is forcing people into battle to their deaths a better outcome? It was reported by Channel 4 and the BBC at the start of this conflict that Ukrainian troops intercepted males aged 16-65 that were trying to flee Ukraine on trains to escape the war zone and marching them off to the front lines wether they wanted to fight or not. That is totalitarian abuse by the state and a good reason not to support it. As I say, I do not support the state and I am in agreement with what Serge Forward has posted on here about all this. I think we should support things like the ambulance convoy and those trying to help refugees. Unfortunately it would appear that there are no people in Ukraine to support that are not fighting with the state, a part of which are fascist organisations in the military (as with Russia). I believe in people's right to defend themselves against imperialism/invasion but do not support the state or any capitalist system.
 
Last edited:
If Putin declares victory tomorrow without having achieved any of his stated goals that’s great, but idk what people mean when they say Russia is winning the war.

Well theres a number of angles we could look at.

Its possible to claim that Russia is still gaining territory, that talk of them having lost on the ground or got stuck in a stalemate or very long conflict was incredibly premature. As demonstrated by the fact the BBC news narrative started to switch to 'the battle to defend Kyiv' on Friday and we'll no doubt be hearing plenty more about that aspect in the week to come.

In that sense, we might consider claims about Russia winning to be an adjustment to compensate for claims that were made that Ukrainian defeat was not inevitable. Those latter claims should always have been treated with some skepticism due to the context. One aspect of which was that they tended to be made by countries that didnt want to see Ukraine lose but were not going to intervene in a manner that was likely to prevent such an eventuality from happening. So they had an interest in not holding up their hands and saying 'we are leaving Ukraine to their fate' even though in some ways thats exactly what they were doing. "While you make pretty speeches, I'm being cut to shreds" stuff.

We could look at other stuff like one of the stated Russian objectives of stopping Ukraine joining NATO, consider what Zelensky said about that some days ago, and view his statement as a concession to Russia on that issue.

And all sorts of other things I'm not going to waffle on about right now, take your pick.

I dont like to boil things down to simple statements about winning or losing, especially when 'victory' doesnt automatically mean achieving everything you want without losing anything else or ending up weaker in other areas such as political popularity, economic prosperity etc.
 
Explain this then Energy security – Ukraine energy profile – Analysis - IEA just the first sentence, Ukraine has a century long history of oil and gas production. it's not bereft of hydrocarbons
In quite recent years (about 10 years ago now) new large gas reserves were discovered in Ukraine (including in the exclusive economic zone in the Black Sea and shale gas in the east and west of Ukraine) and in recent years the Ukrainian ruling class was looking to the western fuel companies (such as Shell and Exxon) to help with harvesting those resources in any large quantity because it lacked the finances, technology and equipment to do so as a relatively poor country.
 
Last edited:
That's all very great, but what if the interests of the State overlaps with those of the working class at times? As arguably it does in Ukraine and did in WW2.
I think the state/boss class and workers' interests can occasionally overlap, but when they do, class interests are inevitably nullified in the perceived national interest. There are no easy answers to your question, but calling for class truce because of overlapping interests is not it.
 
US journalist killed.



eta:


Brent Renaud, an award-winning US film maker whose work has appeared in the New York Times and other outlets has been killed by Russian forces in the flashpoint town of Irpin outside Kyiv while US photographer Juan Arredondo was also wounded.

Renaud, 51, was hit in the neck and died after coming under Russian fire while working in Irpin on Sunday according to local police officials and multiple Ukrainian sources.

Jane Ferguson, a reporter for PBS Newshour who was nearby when Renaud was killed, tweeted: “Just left roadside spot near Irpin where body of American journalist Brent Renaud lay under a blanket. Ukranian medics could do nothing to help him by that stage. Outraged Ukranian police officer: “Tell America, tell the world, what they did to a journalist.”
 
Last edited:
That's a good read. Apparently it has been scrubbed from the Chinese Internet already though.

There's quite a few signs that sections of the Chinese elite are unhappy with Xi destroying relations with the west. The recommendation in that article of reducing tensions with the US to avoid sanctions is unlikely to be followed, however - Xi has built up his loyal support base by promoting hot headed nationalists and it would be difficult to reel them in at this point.

It does increase the likelihood of a coup against Xi though. The 20th National Congress of the Communist Party is later this year and will be when Xi formally starts his third term. It is possible that they may be some intrigue during this time.
Searched and could still find it in a couple of places on the domestic web but it's clearly been deleted from the more mainstream outlets. A search on Hu Wei also had a sanitised look as I recall him featuring in some other ideological controversy a few years back but details now escape me.
 
The death of the American journalist will grab some headlines but ultimately it's a nothing.

I'm more worried about how close those missile strikes are getting to Ukraine's western borders. A strike on incoming trucks believed to be carrying weapons is a matter of when, not if, it will happen
 
The shooting machines that they used to attack that base that’s a very few (7.5?) miles from the border with Poland, those are very accurate precision shooting things ? If one stray bit flew over there by mistake it would probably not mean ww3 though, more likely just get put back over the fence quietly like your neighbours kids football, maybe.
 
Back
Top Bottom