Yeh I love being told what I've just said: the brexit shits expected something wholly different as did putin
Which one?Think the guy is vainglorious and will fail.
Yeah that's Putin, devious and cunning enough to trick over half the UK population into voting to leave the EU, but so stupid and out of touch that he went to war without considering anything but the most optimistic outcome and had no plan if that failed. This is just cartoon stuff.Depending on your view, and the stink of corruption in the Tory govt, the brexiteer thing pretty much was the russia thing.
Major disaster capitalists owning smaller wannabe disaster capitalists in what can only be described as a massive pyramid scheme.
As in Hungary.
Last 30 years of politics mantra:
Money talks. Bullshit walks.
That's basically brexiteering and disaster capitalism in a nutshell.
I was talking about the video that Cid commented on, the one that has Putin apparently at a table with trainee air stewards, which might've been faked/green screened, because it looks like he's waving his hand behind a microphone that sort of looks like it's in front of the person next to him, but I wondered if it might just have been the camera angle.I have no idea what Cid's editing skills are like.
Yeah that's Putin, devious and cunning enough to trick over half the UK population into voting to leave the EU, but so stupid and out of touch that he went to war without considering anything but the most optimistic outcome and had no plan if that failed. This is just cartoon stuff.
Ok that post that he was banned for was calling out a very particular post though.Sure, but it was posted by diamond who... er. yeah. Nothing to do with kaka tim, who disco was using that against.
at least they'll have proper tyres
Post that up and call him out as a hypocrite then. Don't support his banning from the thread.
Also potentially creates a false sense of security? ie reinforces the notion that Ukrainian airspace is open to Russian air force sorties, which lulls them into a false sense or security, because they know no one's enforcing a no fly zone, but in the meantime they're being knocked out of the sky by ground to air missiles.If you don't ask you don't get. And it creates a negotiating position. "Well, if you won't do the no fly zone, what can you help us with?". Publicising it puts pressure on them cos it makes them look like they aren't helping.
I suspect it wasn’t that post specifically causing the ban, he was cunting people off quite a bit in some of the earlier postings so probably more to do with that. Does seem a bit harsh, seen worse, but still but only a day ban.Ok that post that he was banned for was calling out a very particular post though.
It's fucked up that kermit has been banned from the thread for that. I agree with him . It was war porn. Wtf is happening when you get banned for calling it out?
He donated money to UKIP. I don't think anyone believes that takes a genius.Yeah that's Putin, devious and cunning enough to trick over half the UK population into voting to leave the EU, but so stupid and out of touch that he went to war without considering anything but the most optimistic outcome and had no plan if that failed. This is just cartoon stuff.
It's fucked up that kermit has been banned from the thread for that. I agree with him . It was war porn. Wtf is happening when you get banned for calling it out?
Yes, I think this is part of. NATO don't want to do a no-fly zone in the first place, but also why would they when Russia is not dominating the aerial battle anyway?Also potentially creates a false sense of security? ie reinforces the notion that Ukrainian airspace is open to Russian air force sorties, which lulls them into a false sense or security, because they know no one's enforcing a no fly zone, but in the meantime they're being knocked out of the sky by ground to air missiles.
Think thats all of it quoted beneath your quote as not quite got the hang of that on phone so expand it but not read it myself yet though "
Both things can be true, they're not mutually exclusive.Yeah that's Putin, devious and cunning enough to trick over half the UK population into voting to leave the EU, but so stupid and out of touch that he went to war without considering anything but the most optimistic outcome and had no plan if that failed. This is just cartoon stuff.
Over half the Russion army massed on the border suggests they were well aware that this may not be over in a few days, even if that's what they hoped. Or do you think they were just on a day trip and it was pure luck they happened to be there when a more limited surgical assault failed?
Who should we believe, all the renowned military academics and current/former armed forces staff who have been carefully analysing the vast amounts of information online and intelligence reports from Russia and Ukraine, or smokedout on Urban75 who reckons Putin has such a galaxy brain that he can't possibly not have planned for this?Yeah that's Putin, devious and cunning enough to trick over half the UK population into voting to leave the EU, but so stupid and out of touch that he went to war without considering anything but the most optimistic outcome and had no plan if that failed. This is just cartoon stuff.
Yes, I think this is part of. NATO don't want to do a no-fly zone in the first place, but also why would they when Russia is not dominating the aerial battle anyway?
I don't buy at all the idea that it's simply about fear of nuclear war. Of course the risk has to weigh heavily. But it's nonsense that it simply can't be done.
if NATO announced that they would enforce a short no-fly zone, what would happen is that Russian planes wouldn't fly for a short period.
In addition to monitoring, fighter aircraft are needed to enforce a no-fly zone. Ben Hodges, who was the commander of the U.S. Army Europe and now works for the U.S.-based Center for European Policy Analysis, said: "You'd have aircraft that are prepared for air-to-air [combat], to shoot down other aircraft.
You'd have aircraft that are prepared to shoot down drones and you would want to be prepared to have other aircraft that are prepared to hit ground targets, air defense, for example. So, there's a mix of capabilities that you would need, including the AWACS and including the helicopters that would be used to go in and rescue [potentially downed pilots]."
According to Hodges, there are other reasons to be cautious. "We would never put pilots up in the air if we were not prepared to destroy enemy air defenses on the ground. So now you're talking about shooting, attacking Russian ground targets inside Ukraine and probably even inside Russia," Hodges said.
"And then another consideration is that we would never put pilots in the air if we were not prepared to go in and pick them up if they were shot down and had to parachute. So, you've got to have the possibility of picking up a naval pilot on the ground in Ukraine or even in Russia."
DK's been banned?
I disagree that there's been any war porn on here, but that's bollocks if true.
On day thread ban only.