krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
A special operation, perhapsHas the thread got any plans for celebrating victory day?
A special operation, perhapsHas the thread got any plans for celebrating victory day?
Has the thread got any plans for celebrating victory day?
I’m celebrating my parents not being dragged out onto the street with their hands tied behind their backs, shot, and left in the road etc etcHas the thread got any plans for celebrating victory day?
Shame so many Ukrainians won't be able to celebrate that with you.I’m celebrating my parents not being dragged out onto the street with their hands tied behind their backs, shot, and left in the road etc etc
Shame so many Ukrainians won't be able to celebrate that with you.
FT https://archive.ph/RSktd
Ukraine is to start recruiting prisoners to fight against Russia under a new law designed to bolster its frontline forces, including with men convicted of murder or fraud.
......
The drive to enlist convicts is expected to result in several thousand new recruits from a prison population of about 20,000, according to David Arakhamia, a senior lawmaker. That is a fraction of the hundreds of thousands of fresh soldiers Ukraine says it needs this year to hold back Moscow’s advancing forces
.....
Ineligible convicts include serial murderers, drug traffickers and those guilty of sexual violence, corruption and national security crimes, according to Olena Shuliak, an MP from Zelenskyy’s party.
Men convicted of a single murder can sign up but would be automatically excluded if also found guilty of rape. Former high-ranking politicians and ministers who are serving prison terms are also not allowed to enlist.
Shuliak acknowledged that the law had the potential to “cause a violent reaction from society”, but said that it had been crafted together with the ministries of defence and justice, as well as the armed forces.
noso only the russian army will recruit rapists into it ranks
Men convicted of a single murder can sign up but would be automatically excluded if also found guilty of rape.
Never forgetHas the thread got any plans for celebrating victory day?
Updated - at least seven people known to be injured, incuding four children.A Russian attack on Kharkiv has left at least three children injured.
Russian attack against Kharkiv injures at least 4, including children
At least three boys, aged 14, 15, and an eight-year-old girl were injured, the prosecutors said. Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov described the condition of one of the children as "serious."
A 55-year-old man and two women were reportedly injured as well.
Russia has recently intensified attacks against Kharkiv, using missiles, glide bombs, and drones to destroy energy infrastructure and kill civilians.
The attack killed a 62-year-old man and a 65-year-old woman, while two men aged 39 and 67 were injured, Lysak said.
Two homes, a gas pipeline, a shop, and farm buildings were hit in the strike, and five apartment buildings were damaged.
At least six people, including a six-year-old girl and a 91-year-old woman, were injured in Nikopol on May 7 during a day of intense Russian attacks.
My position is :Never forget
I really struggle to understand what your point is with these constant news updates about the Ukrainian draft. Is it that imposing penalties for breaking the law is wrong? If so, does that apply to any laws or just this one? Or is it Is it that conscripting an army is flat-out wrong? In which case, why do you never post about the Russia draft? Is news content about the draft only interesting if it is Ukrainian news? Or do you only think that conscription is wrong if you’re the invaded country, but fine if you’re the ones invading?
- Ukraine’s parliament backed a bill to crack down on voted-on draft dodgers. The legislation includes raising fines for anyone caught trying to avoid the call-up and allowing authorities to detain draft dodgers for up to three days.
I really struggle to understand what your point is with these constant news updates about the Ukrainian draft. Is it that imposing penalties for breaking the law is wrong? If so, does that apply to any laws or just this one? Or is it Is it that conscripting an army is flat-out wrong? In which case, why do you never post about the Russia draft? Is news content about the draft only interesting if it is Ukrainian news? Or do you only think that conscription is wrong if you’re the invaded country, but fine if you’re the ones invading?
The sheer frequency of these posts certainly imply you have some kind of point to make. Why don’t you take the opportunity to clarify what that is, so that there is no doubt?
I’m not the one using it to make a comment about one of the sides in the war and not the otherForcing people into the army is enslavement be it by Ukraine, Russia, Denmark, Eritrea,Israel or either of the Koreas. Don't you think that is wrong?
You imply that laws that enslave people are no different from any other.I’m not the one using it to make a comment about one of the sides in the war and not the other
Forcing people into the army is enslavement be it by Ukraine, Russia, Denmark, Eritrea,Israel or either of the Koreas. Don't you think that is wrong?
.The individual has the right to decide what is right or wrong for them. The state has no right to force them into the military and send them to murder or be murdered.Do you get to decide what's right and wrong for others, or do they get a say?
Conscription/National Service is considered entirely legitimate in Finland, Estonia, and Denmark (the places I know about, because I spend a lot of time in those places) including in the cohort who actually get conscripted. If they don't consider it enslavement, does your opinion matter more than theirs?
Personally I'm ambivalent on the concept of compulsory national service (which, imv, is a much wider idea than simply doing three years as a junior soldier), but the idea that anywhere it happens is by definition some kind of quasi-Fascist, authoritarian hellhole - like Finland, Estonia, Denmark, Norway, routinely voted the happiest places to live in the world - is just crass, embarrassingly simplistic nonsense.
Is it? Maybe TopCat could explain for himself why he repeatedly posts the latest news about Ukrainian conscription and never the latest news about Russian conscription or, for example, the latest news about Russian atrocities committed across Ukraine. I’d like to know his own reasoning for why the former is so much more interesting and newsworthy than the latter.It's surely being used as evidence against the image of Ukrainians as a united people all willing to fight Russia to the last man.
I imply nothing. I’m asking TopCat what his point is.You imply that laws that enslave people are no different from any other.
I cant wait to see what gentile conscription rules kick in when we here in Oceania fully go to war once again with EastAsia
You're wasting your time.I imply nothing. I’m asking TopCat what his point is.
Sure. The point is the west is much more enthusiastic about fighting this war than the Ukrainians who are forced by law to join up. Yet western supporters ignore the frantic efforts to avoid going to the front and urge the war to continue. Essentially I am taking aim at warmongers who scorn negotiations and call for more war but at no risk to themselves.I really struggle to understand what your point is with these constant news updates about the Ukrainian draft. Is it that imposing penalties for breaking the law is wrong? If so, does that apply to any laws or just this one? Or is it Is it that conscripting an army is flat-out wrong? In which case, why do you never post about the Russia draft? Is news content about the draft only interesting if it is Ukrainian news? Or do you only think that conscription is wrong if you’re the invaded country, but fine if you’re the ones invading?
The sheer frequency of these posts certainly imply you have some kind of point to make. Why don’t you take the opportunity to clarify what that is, so that there is no doubt?