platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
it wouldn’t surprise me if it turns out he’s involved.
He looks a bit like my neighbour, who is highly annoying and has a dog.
it wouldn’t surprise me if it turns out he’s involved.
and he would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those pesky kidsI wouldn't be surprised if there were some websleuths out there claiming the dog did it.
Yes, another story led to endless speculation.This has similarities with Claudia Lawrence.
meat and drink to us here at urbanYes, another story led to endless speculation.
I was more thinking a woman vanishing on her way to work and never heard from again.Yes, another story led to endless speculation.
nothing surprises you tho
Moi aussi (I am an Australian).I know what you mean and I think I agree with you.
Luckily for Urban, total nutcases on Twitter have got to the bottom of this case......
Do they still have those crappy little plastic toys inside ? Used to make them for my nephew.Kinder eggs do.
Moi aussi (I am an Australian).
It's the Fenian blood that does it.TBH, as an Australian, Idris2002's ability to read and write is commendable....
see the long-running thread, travelling to australia without a criminal recordIt's the Fenian blood that does it.
Anyway, speaking not of this case specifically, but shifty behaviour in general. A friend of mine once had to give testimony in a murder case in the USA, which ended in a mistrial because another witness said under oath that he had passed a lie detector test. In this particular state of the United States of Should've Voted for Bernie, such tests were not admissable in court.
The reasoning there is that they don't test whether you're lying or not, but just if your heart rate or pulse is increasing etc. A stone cold psychopath could pass that sort of thing with no worries, while Nervous Norvus might easily end up on death row - or transported to Australia, if that's still a thing.
It's the Fenian blood that does it.
Anyway, speaking not of this case specifically, but shifty behaviour in general. A friend of mine once had to give testimony in a murder case in the USA, which ended in a mistrial because another witness said under oath that he had passed a lie detector test. In this particular state of the United States of Should've Voted for Bernie, such tests were not admissable in court.
The reasoning there is that they don't test whether you're lying or not, but just if your heart rate or pulse is increasing etc. A stone cold psychopath could pass that sort of thing with no worries, while Nervous Norvus might easily end up on death row - or transported to Australia, if that's still a thing.
he's more mel gibson tbhI'm now reading your posts with a Steve Irwin accent.
Unfortunately MRNA induced cardiomyopathy is...I’m not medically trained, but I don’t think an mRNA induced heart attack is a real thing.
The thing puzzles me here is why is her phone left on the Bench untouched and still in connected to work, so did no one from her work ask questions at the time why she was there at the time?
Press conference:
8:43 seen walking towards iron bridge
8:47 seen in lower field with dog and phone
8:53 sent email to boss on phone
9:01 joined teams work call
9:10 was in upper field with dog out of harness
all the above was normal behaviour for her.
9:20 phone on bench
9:30 teams meeting ended but her phone remained connected
9:33 person found dog between gate of field and bench
Can't account for her movements between 9:10 and 9:20 yet
Have checked lots of doorbell cameras etc and currently believe she never left the riverside area and no third party involved
Working hypothesis is therefore that she fell in the river. Speculation of other's involvement unhelpful.
It's not unusual to have your camera off.The thing puzzles me here is why is her phone left on the Bench untouched and still in connected to work, so did no one from her work ask questions at the time why she was there at the time?
Another question why was the phone left on the bench?May be a stupid question...but..
How do they know the phone was on the bench at 9.20?
True but as someone said the volume was mute so I guess her boss and work would not have heard any commotion unfortunatelyIt's not unusual to have your camera off.
May be a stupid question...but..
How do they know the phone was on the bench at 9.20?
Another question why was the phone left on the bench?
Perhaps you need to watch more ITV crime dramas to improve your skillsI must be very bad at reading people. I don't see anything suspicious in his behaviour.