Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

*IRAQ: latest news and developments

originally posted by Lock & Light

"It would be a relief to many of us if you were only to post "on topic".

For some of us , not at all would be better."


Lookin the mirror you prat !!
 
Originally posted by Stobart Spotter
Iraq radio says a US missile has hit Saddams family home.

I have a feeling that he won't be in it though!

Well, at least he won't be going back to it, either.
 
As you go about your daily life, pursuing whatever course and avenue you choose please remember that others hard won the freedoms you have in the palm of your hand.

Soldiers fought in past wars to preserve your freedoms. Americans and British soldiers died in France in 1942 facing an aggressive racist dictator. The battles they fought preserved your freedom and prosperity.

You are at liberty to protest about war and have that right. You can choose to speak out against governments and systems of government without fear of death. You can support whatever cause or theory you wish.

Soldiers fought to give you that right.

You have the comfort and freedom to ignore conflict and suffering in the world.

Soldiers fought to give you that choice.

Soldiers are fighting again tonight.
 
Big ignore to Friz who's rudely ignored the clearly stated topic of this thread, put that post up as a new topic if you want it discussed Friz.
 
Allies capture key town


US and British troops invading from Kuwait seized the key Iraqi border town of Umm Qasr, the official Kuwaiti News Agency said.


Umm is the first Iraqi town on the road to Basra, Iraq's second city It is the site of Iraq's second naval base and one of the country's main commercial seaports. It lies near the Shatt al Arab waterway that leads to Basra.
Earlier Royal Marine Commandos are reported to have stormed into southern Iraq as part of a sustained Coalition assault.

(Press Association- link here
 
"Soldiers fought to give you that right."

My great-uncle died aged 23 to give me that right and in his memory I oppose this war.
 
Originally posted by whiterose
"Soldiers fought to give you that right."

My great-uncle died aged 23 to give me that right and in his memory I oppose this war.

You are fully entitled to do so; because of your great-uncle.
 
change of subject slightly

They've just said on BBC2 that most of the 24 missiles fired into Iraq last night were actually fired from two British nuclear submarines, HMS Turbulent and HMS Splendid. Which, apparently, is contrary to what was said in initial reports.
 
More than 35 nations have joine US-led "coalition of the willing," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer says.

from beeb

anyone who the 33 others are? And are they contributing anything?





friz is a robot. ignore
 
One big downside for the US administration: their writers.

What could be a worse term than "Coalition of the Willing"?

It sets my teeth on edge every time I hear it.

I think history will dub this the "War of the Wimpy Words".
 
reply for bruise
The US and Britain cannot find “the wi ll i n g” to lead
Washington says that in the war on Iraq they lead a coalition of 45 nations. This is a transparent sham:
• 15 of the 45 are too ashamed to be named.
• 24 of the rest are sending NO troops. This includes Spain!
• 4 are sending token numbers (less than 300 at most).
That leaves Australia (2,000 troops), the UK (45,000) and the US (315,000). It’s not a coalition, it’s a gang.
Among the 15 not willing to be named are presumably Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Djibouti where US forces are based. None of them will sign on in public.
Egypt might be another. And Israel is not on the list either.
Also conspicuous by their absence are NATO allies Canada, Belgium, and Norway (not just France and Germany) and the larger Central and South American countries Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico.

The full list, annotated:
For more info, see http://www.mbeaw.org and links there.
This flyer made 3/12/03 by Pete Shanks,
[last fig in each entry is footnote number (scroll down)]

Afghanistan We promised them rebuilding money but
the Bush administration forgot to request
any in the latest budget.1
Albania 70 For noncombatant roles only.
Australia 2,000 76% of the people oppose joining a US-led
attack that does not have UN approval.2
Azerbaijan Squeezed between Iran, Armenia, Georgia
and Russia, and positioning itself for
resolution of South Caucasus conflicts.
Bulgaria “seeking US financial or military support”3
Colombia major US-financed drug war in progress
Czech Rep. few “a ch em i c a l - bi o l ogical warf a re su pport unit”3
Denmark 79% of the people against action without
UN approval; 57% against even with it.4
El Salvador On which side is their bread buttered?
Eritrea seeking US support in a boundary dispute
with Ethiopia (q.v.)3
Estonia “seeking US financial or military support”3
Ethiopia seeking US support in a boundary dispute
with Eritrea (q.v.)3
Georgia “already involved in the war on terrorism”3
Hungary wants UK & US su pport for en try to the EU
Italy “Only 34% [of the people] view the US
positively, compared to 70% in 2002.”3
Japan “restricting its support to post-Saddam
reconstruction”5
Country Troops Comment
Korea a little busy with the North
Latvia “seeking US financial or military support”3
Lithuania “seeking US financial or military support”3
Macedonia wants US support in the Balkans
Netherlands 89% of the people against action without
UN approval; 72% against even with it 6
Nicaragua wouldn’t want their harbor mined again
Philippines “already involved in the war on terrorism”3
Poland 200 “Support for the US has dropped from
80% to 50%.”3
Romania 278 “non-combat experts in demining and in
chemical and biological decontamination,
and military police”5
Slovakia 75% against war without UN backing 7
Spain “Spain will not participate in any attack or
offensive missions,” said Prime Minister
Aznar.8 Presumably because “only 14%
have a favourable image” of the US.3
Turkey The Parliament turned down a huge (up to
$26 billion) bribe to let US t roops in but
the government will allow overflights.
UK 45,000 Blurred vision
US 315,000 130,000 in Kuwait, 95,000 in Qatar,
Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, etc, and 90,000 on
their way
Uzbekistan “a major beneficiary of U.S. assistance
during and after the war in Afghanistan”

1 BBC 2/13/03 2 The Au s tra l i a n 2/4/03 3 BBC 03/18/03 4 AFP 1/25/03 5 Gu a rd i a n 3/19/03 6 AFP 1/27/03 7 Syd n ey Mo rning Hera l d 1/30/03 8 AP 3/18/03 9 Wa s h i n g ton Po s t 1 2 / 0 4 / 0 2
 
WR,

Damn good post!



The latest is US has asked the world nations to kick out Iraqi Embassy Staff from their respective countries! (There is no precedence ever for this stunt)

Clearly UN resolution or no UN resolution now Dubya is going to order the world and get approval on his own this time round!
 
Man, the garbage that is spewing forth from the tv and radio is nonsense. This is happening, that is happening, this has happened.....It's all bullshit.

Lets face it, we aren't going to know whats going on until after it's all over, if ever......
 
This all feels so terribly wrong...... my worst fears are about to be realised. The US are taking over the oil fields first, making sure they are safe and then the slaughter will begin............. I pray and hope that I am wrong.
 
Originally posted by technocat
Man, the garbage that is spewing forth from the tv and radio is nonsense. This is happening, that is happening, this has happened.....It's all bullshit.

Lets face it, we aren't going to know whats going on until after it's all over, if ever......


Nice & sanitised, easy for the TV consumer. I watched the telly tonight and there was talk of 1 or 2 civilian casualties. LIKE FUCK!

:mad:
 
12 Americans and 4 British dead in a helicopter crash.

Thought to be an accident, but casualties all the same.

Source: BBC Radio 5
 
Nice & sanitised, easy for the TV consumer. I watched the telly tonight and there was talk of 1 or 2 civilian casualties. LIKE FUCK!

What not enough blood???

I mean the battle hasn't started yet and probably never will.
 
Back
Top Bottom