No better from Yvette Cooper. They are likely waiting to take their cue from Washington:Our PM - former DPP, one of the finest legal minds in the country
No better from Yvette Cooper. They are likely waiting to take their cue from Washington:
and Biden's response to the arrest warrants is fairly predictable:
Israel Gaza: Netanyahu ICC war crimes arrest warrant 'outrageous' says Biden
US President Joe Biden calls the issuing of warrants against Israeli officials including Benjamin Netanyahu "outrageous".www.bbc.com
He no longer has a certificate to practiceOur PM - former DPP, one of the finest legal minds in the country
No better from Yvette Cooper. They are likely waiting to take their cue from Washington:
and Biden's response to the arrest warrants is fairly predictable:
Israel Gaza: Netanyahu ICC war crimes arrest warrant 'outrageous' says Biden
US President Joe Biden calls the issuing of warrants against Israeli officials including Benjamin Netanyahu "outrageous".www.bbc.com
TBF the answer from a Labour party MP doesn't surprise me.
It's the line they have been taking. Not following US but trying for a centre ground approach.
Of course when it comes to Ukraine that's different
Britain welcomes issuing of arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin
The International Criminal Court has acted over the alleged abduction and deportation of thousands of Ukrainian children.www.standard.co.uk
Starmer on Putin arrest warrant,
He applauded arrest warrant for Putin.
TBF the answer from a Labour party MP doesn't surprise me.
It's the line they have been taking. Not following US but trying for a centre ground approach.
Of course when it comes to Ukraine that's different
Britain welcomes issuing of arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin
The International Criminal Court has acted over the alleged abduction and deportation of thousands of Ukrainian children.www.standard.co.uk
Starmer on Putin arrest warrant,
He applauded arrest warrant for Putin.
But let's not forget what happened with new labour the last time a fascist former leader was arrested in the UKThe whole world sees these double-standards.
The last mainstream politician in power in Britain who I can think of that had even a tiny bit of credibility was Robin Cook. People scoffed when he spoke about an ethical foreign policy, but the intention was genuine. And he had time for this spat with Netanyahu back in 1998. British Foreign Secretaries have not always been as supine as Lammy.
Netanyahu Angrily Cancels Dinner With Visiting Briton (Published 1998)
But since Cook? A continuous stream of absolute shits.
That Pinochet was arrested was a major credit to the Blair government. That he was released was a discredit. The effect in Chile was positive, in that it acted to lessen the fear of bringing murderers and torturers and rapists to justice.But let's not forget what happened with new labour the last time a fascist former leader was arrested in the UK
The majority of Israeli surveillance flights are by British military, Al Jaz reports. Utterly complicit, never mind the arms salesStarmer's a snivelling piece of shit who's as complicit in Israeli war crimes as any western leader. We should lock him up first.
Tbf the whole political world has seen those double standards for as long as memories go back ... No state is surprised or had to change their perspectiveThe whole world sees these double-standards.
Israel is not an ICC member state, and so is not under their agreement. Gaza, however, is, which is where it is tricky for Israel.
The definition of a state does not depend on recognition by other states. When I was a child, the People's Republic of China was not recognised by many states, including the UK and the USA, and was not allowed to be a member of the United Nations.As of June 2024, the State of Palestine is recognized as a sovereign state by 146 of the 193 member states of the United Nations, or just over 75% of all UN members. It has been a non-member observer state of the United Nations General Assembly since November 2012.
The stats say its recognised by 146 of the 193 of the 193 member states of the United Nations, or just over 75% of all UN members.The definition of a state does not depend on recognition by other states. When I was a child, the People's Republic of China was not recognised by many states, including the UK and the USA, and was not allowed to be a member of the United Nations.
That does not change the fact that Palestine is not a state. It does not have any agreed borders, does not have an army, and is not sovereign on any land.The stats say its recognised by 146 of the 193 of the 193 member states of the United Nations, or just over 75% of all UN members.
TBF the answer from a Labour party MP doesn't surprise me.
It's the line they have been taking. Not following US but trying for a centre ground approach.
Of course when it comes to Ukraine that's different
Britain welcomes issuing of arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin
The International Criminal Court has acted over the alleged abduction and deportation of thousands of Ukrainian children.www.standard.co.uk
Starmer on Putin arrest warrant,
He applauded arrest warrant for Putin.
There has been a claim that the ICC is racist, because the people it took action against had all been from states in Africa. To act against the State of Israel would go some way to rebutting this accusation.And the other thing about the arrest warrants and anti semitism.
An argument goes even if one is not openly anti Semitic a sign of it is picking out Israel in particular
Leading legal minds have now agreed to arrest warrants for two leading members of the Israel state and one ( who may or not be dead ) Hamas leading member,
So imo Israel is being treated just the same as say Putin in Russia.
Its not that Israel is being unfairly picked on.
Fair point although as some posters have indicated on the Ukraine threads the opinions of countries that aren't 'The West' dont really count.There has been a claim that the ICC is racist, because the people it took action against had all been from states in Africa. To act against the State of Israel would go some way to rebutting this accusation.