Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

XL Bully dog - discussion

What were the dog owners doing all those days in which a child was pulling their dog around by its tail? If a bite by the dog would have been self-defence, it would have been entirely the owners fault for leaving it with that child for so long while knowing the child's behaviour. It sounds like they're not responsible enough to own a dog and it was right that the dog was removed from them.
I think the bottom line is that it is not actually realistic to expect anyone with a potentially dangerous dog to be a responsible dog owner 24 hours a day.
 
I will come out as a dog stalker now but don't you have a big dog? Just not as muscly? But possibly still considered quite a wilful breed?

Yes. Husky/dalmatian. He's about 30kg so half an XL bully. Huskies are often crap at recall and ours is the same so he's never off the lead.

He's also an unbelievable wimp. He once fled in terror from a small frog.
 
Just ban everything to the left of labradors.
I've owned 3 dogs in that group.

1 German shepherd cross that was virtually scared of his own shadow.

Another German shepherd that loved playing with puppies even when her hip was going and she'd fall over in the process.

A husky that was so soft it was unbelievable. She was that soft that when she was bitten by another dog she just stood there and whimpered. If someone broke in they could have picked her up and walked off with her. :eek: :(
 
Spent my childhood with GSDs, our own plus GLC owned for my dad's job as a dog handler. No bites/attacks.

Not really equiv to XL Bully or other fighting breeds so not sure why you're widening that net.

No, but it is and should be a major responsibility to own one. I mean the last one I had regular contact with was an absolutely wonderful dog, but her owner was a piece of shit (seriously kind of wish I could have taken her on, but there we go, I think she went to his brother in the end). It is a breed that sometimes attracts dickheads. I actually don't really have solutions. Outright bans are a pretty crude tool at the best of times. But think the current systems we have around owning dogs are... in need of a rethink.
 
Spent my childhood with GSDs, our own plus GLC owned for my dad's job as a dog handler. No bites/attacks.

Not really equiv to XL Bully or other fighting breeds so not sure why you're widening that net.
I think GSDs are comparable in some respects for the general conversation....potential to do harm, they're a decent size, often used for safety/security ..... but I think their temperament is quite different and they are (easily?) trainable?

I feel they could become a replacement well 'ard dog for those that need/want one
 
What were the dog owners doing all those days in which a child was pulling their dog around by its tail? If a bite by the dog would have been self-defence, it would have been entirely the owners fault for leaving it with that child for so long while knowing the child's behaviour. It sounds like they're not responsible enough to own a dog and it was right that the dog was removed from them.
fuck off. the owners told the brat repeatedly to stop bothering the dog, even physically separating them to stop the abuse, repeatedly. Brat would let themselves into the specific area where the dog was "to play" despite being told to leave the dog alone.
There were two families living in a site meant for one family, that was also being rebuilt at the time. So something of a lack of space & the adults were usually working on the rebuild.
the real problem was the child's parents always let the brat do whatever it wanted, without question or penalty, and it thought the visitor's dog was just another thing for it to play with.

[also, it was suggested when this was discussed recently that the brat was making up being bitten, as the "injury" didn't look like a dog bite, not sure if it was photographed ]
 
fuck off. the owners told the brat repeatedly to stop bothering the dog, even physically separating them to stop the abuse, repeatedly. Brat would let themselves into the specific area where the dog was "to play" despite being told to leave the dog alone.
There were two families living in a site meant for one family, that was also being rebuilt at the time. So something of a lack of space & the adults were usually working on the rebuild.
the real problem was the child's parents always let the brat do whatever it wanted, without question or penalty, and it thought the visitor's dog was just another thing for it to play with.

[also, it was suggested when this was discussed recently that the brat was making up being bitten, as the "injury" didn't look like a dog bite, not sure if it was photographed ]
They left the kid unattended when he had those behaviours and the dog was a threat? Wtf if there's a lack of space someone should easily have been watching.
 
I think GSDs are comparable in some respects for the general conversation....potential to do harm, they're a decent size, often used for safety/security ..... but I think their temperament is quite different and they are (easily?) trainable?

I feel they could become a replacement well 'ard dog for those that need/want one

BiB - they've already been there ... several decades ago, the breed standard GSD was, quite often, a bag of bad tempered nerves.
A lot were trained for security and had developed aggressive streaks.
That's why the armed forces, police & many security firms used them [& still do, although the nervous aggression isn't so prominent as it used to be].
FYI the military dogs are [still] trained to bite and then release on command.

Quite a few of the forces "rejects" or those animals produced from private breeders went into civilian security ... and they had the reputation of being nasty, bitey dogs. Some security firms in the late 1970s expected their staff to procure the dogs themselves.
At that time, In the same block of flats as me there was such a guy living in a small [2-bed] flat with his family and at least three GSDs. On more than one occasion at least one of the dogs got out. When walking past their front door one afternoon I ended up with at least one dog hanging off my arm - luckily I had a thick & loose coat on, so I wasn't bitten, but the coat needed serious repairs.

At this time, and for at least a couple of decades afterwards, the "hard men" had GSDs, with big choke chain collars, as some form of status symbol ...
 
All dogs are potentially dangerous.

The ones with the most potential to be dangerous are obviously the types with an established track record of killing people and which can overpower an adult human. Those are the ones that even with a “responsible owner” shouldn’t be permitted in our society.
 
No, the kid - not a toddler, btw - wasn't unattended, but disobedient - they had been told not to go in the back of the yard - the dog's in the run.
And watching the kid is the responsibility of the parent, not the dog owner.
Who are not the same people.
No, it's the responsibility of any dog owner to ensure their dog isn't a danger to anyone else. If that means watching out for other people's children, that's what it means.

As I said above, this might be an unrealistic expectation. But, all the same, if anyone is attacked by a dog, the owner is to blame, not the child or the parents or the council or whatever.
 
Kids do fuck around with pets though. I remember when I was with my ex and my son was a toddler we visited a friend of hers and they had an English bull terrier. It was fucking huge and I was on the edge of my seat the entire time. Nothing happened but I wasn’t comfortable at all as my kid doesn’t know the risks and could have been unpredictable, as could the dog.
They have dogs of their own. Only a Yorkshire Terrier and a Pug/Chihuahua Cross but he would do stuff to them when her back was turned.
 
This is a mildly interesting read: Breed-specific legislation - Wikipedia

Restrictions in various countries. Pit bulls seem to be a fairly standard restricted breed plus a few of the ones E/W/S also list. There seems to be some variation around bull breeds as a whole but most countries seem to lump them all in together.

I think if you're going to ban a breed type then that is probably how to do it but then the justification for that should be applied to other breed types with the same characteristics.

From another thing I was reading it seems to suggest that you can have a Pitbull in the UK if various administrative criteria are met. Which I guess might account for dome of the 8% of deaths linked to banned breeds? Unless they were just unofficial residents.
 
I've owned 3 dogs in that group.

1 German shepherd cross that was virtually scared of his own shadow.

Another German shepherd that loved playing with puppies even when her hip was going and she'd fall over in the process.

A husky that was so soft it was unbelievable. She was that soft that when she was bitten by another dog she just stood there and whimpered. If someone broke in they could have picked her up and walked off with her. :eek: :(
And I'm sure lots of people can tell anecdotes about how long they've owned a collection of assault rifles without any harm coming to anyone. But that's not really a compelling reason to allow ownership of assault rifles.
 
And I'm sure lots of people can tell anecdotes about how long they've owned a collection of assault rifles without any harm coming to anyone. But that's not really a compelling reason to allow ownership of assault rifles.
You're not suggesting that assault rifles are living creatures with a mind of their own, surely?
 
Kids do fuck around with pets though. I remember when I was with my ex and my son was a toddler we visited a friend of hers and they had an English bull terrier. It was fucking huge and I was on the edge of my seat the entire time. Nothing happened but I wasn’t comfortable at all as my kid doesn’t know the risks and could have been unpredictable, as could the dog.
They have dogs of their own. Only a Yorkshire Terrier and a Pug/Chihuahua Cross but he would do stuff to them when her back was turned.
The last time I saw my beloved cat Penny who had spent the second half of her life at my mum's house my kids pulled her tail, miaowed and hissed at her and just generally chased her round the house making her miserable. I half expected her to take a swipe at one of them but she thankfully didn't.
 
The similarity with some dog owners and the whole gun debate in the US is quite amazing.

“Oh but my thing is fine, I’m a responsible owner and I’ve never had a problem…”

Well, tough. Others have caused deaths. Get rid of them.
Which breeds do you think should be banned? xl bullies, pitbulls? Staffs, GSDs, dobermans, huskies? (Honest question btw, I don't see the point of the first 2 (nor the wolf hybrid types) but after that I'm not 100% but then I know lovely dogs of those other breeds so i possibly fall into the gun debate thing.

Someone suggested upthread that size is a factor - if it can overpower an adult, it should be banned, (tho depends on the adult I would have thought.)
 
Which breeds do you think should be banned? xl bullies, pitbulls? Staffs, GSDs, dobermans, huskies? (Honest question btw, I don't see the point of the first 2 (nor the wolf hybrid types) but after that I'm not 100% but then I know lovely dogs of those other breeds so i possibly fall into the gun debate thing.

Someone suggested upthread that size is a factor - if it can overpower an adult, it should be banned, (tho depends on the adult I would have thought.)
I tend to view everything through a fairly tight scientific/statistical lens, so I’d start there. It’s clear certain breeds are not simply “man’s best friend” family pets, present a much greater statistical risk than others, and should have an outright ban, effective immediately. And yes, that would involved euthanising some animals. I am OK with that. Other (all?) breeds we need to look at a return to licensing/registration of owners, with possibly also looking at mandatory training/requirements for ownership.
 
I tend to view everything through a fairly tight scientific/statistical lens, so I’d start there. It’s clear certain breeds are not simply “man’s best friend” family pets, present a much greater statistical risk than others, and should have an outright ban, effective immediately. And yes, that would involved euthanising some animals. I am OK with that. Other (all?) breeds we need to look at a return to licensing/registration of owners, with possibly also looking at mandatory training/requirements for ownership.
Oi you didn't answer the question!
 
Back
Top Bottom