Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

XL Bully dog - discussion

I'm pretty certain that significantly less than eight percent of dogs in this country are banned breeds. Do you have any evidence at all that it's that high?

I never said it was “that high”. Whatever that is. Just that the number is likely to be hard to ascertain.
 
So you agree that dangerous banned dogs are more likely to attack people than legal breeds.

The letters in blue at the top right corner of a post are useful for working out who you are arguing with at any given time.

And actually, at this moment in time, I very much doubt that is correct because the XL is not on the banned list.
 
You join in a conversation and then tell me I'm talking to the wrong person? Fuck off and die you pointless waste of amino acids.

Yeah, I said it would be hard to tell how many dogs of the banned breeds are out there. It’s kind of relevant regardless of whether you’ve pinned your flaccid ego to it being above as opposed to below a given number.
 
Yeah, I said it would be hard to tell how many dogs of the banned breeds are out there. It’s kind of relevant regardless of whether you’ve pinned your flaccid ego to it being above as opposed to below a given number.

It's you that's making posts and refusing to back them up. Eight percent would be one in twelve and a half. Where are these dogs? Not in any of my local parks. I don't need detailed data to tell me there aren't nine hundred thousand banned dogs in this country.
 
It's you that's making posts and refusing to back them up. Eight percent would be one in twelve and a half. Where are these dogs? Not in any of my local parks. I don't need detailed data to tell me there aren't nine hundred thousand banned dogs in this country.
The 8% came from the RSPCA in platinumsage earlier post.
 
The 8% came from the RSPCA in platinumsage earlier post.
Eight percent of attacks are by banned dogs. I'm making the point that unless banned dogs are eight percent (or over) of the UK canine population then they are attacking people at a higher rate than dogs that aren't. You seemed to not understand that in your post.
 
Eight percent of attacks are by banned dogs. I'm making the point that unless banned dogs are eight percent (or over) of the UK canine population then they are attacking people at a higher rate than dogs that aren't. You seemed to not understand that in your post.

Well, that changes over time. Last year, and so far this year, no fatal dog attacks in the UK were by banned breeds.

Which was being held up as an example of the success of these laws.
 
Eight percent of attacks are by banned dogs. I'm making the point that unless banned dogs are eight percent (or over) of the UK canine population then they are attacking people at a higher rate than dogs that aren't. You seemed to not understand that in your post.
Which is the point I made earlier in that the dat should be presented as a percentage rather than just numbers if that's what they've done.
 
Back
Top Bottom