UnderOpenSky
baseline neural therapy
<ed: absolutely the wrong thread for cat memes>
Last edited by a moderator:
Who needs Siegfried Sassoon to document the horrors of the trenches when we have such apposite cat memes?
I'm intrigued as to where you get this idea of fanatical heights from Phil? Seems to have been apathy and indifference then support solidifying when some attacks occurred in Russia, just because it was coming home rather than Nazis or Germans. Also the idea that since they've started it they'd best win or they're fucked. But fanaticism seems notably absent.My point was that the West blundered by fighting alongside Nazi units because, although they are not representative of the majority, they hand Putin the propaganda tool of representing the war as a fight against Nazis thus motivating his population to fanatical heights that he could achieve by no other means.
My other point was that involving German in the war was a similar blunder because, although Germany is not a Nazi country, it hand Putin the even better indeed unsurpassable propaganda tool of... etc. etc.
There is no thread that cannot be improved by cat memes<ed: absolutely the wrong thread for cat memes>
I'm intrigued as to where you get this idea of fanatical heights from Phil? Seems to have been apathy and indifference then support solidifying when some attacks occurred in Russia, just because it was coming home rather than Nazis or Germans. Also the idea that since they've started it they'd best win or they're fucked. But fanaticism seems notably absent.
Don't doubt there's the usual types but it doesn't seem to have caught on generally, though I am tending to read the anti-Putin sources. But the credible ones like meduza certainly give that impression.It depends who you talk to. I really meant that Putin aspired to rise his populace to such heights, not that he often achieves it. But he does achieve it sometimes. There are a lot of nutters in Russia, and I've met plenty who are fanatically anti-Nazi, believe that Ukraine is dominated by Nazis, and support the war (you might say fanatically) for those reasons. Remember Givi (can post clip if not)? Guys like that.
phildwyer 's name is often invoked in the routine that some like to go through, where they complain about wind-up threads being better in the olden days so let's see how he measures up; the pressure is on.It is interesting to observe the Dwyering of threads from my new, kinder, more tolerant perspective.
I wonder if it'll last
My money is on it being like ernestolynch's comeback, much anticipated but unable to live up to the hype of people's nostalgic recollections, followed by a sad decline into irrelevance, as a weary userbase gets more and more bored by someone starring in their own bad tribute act.phildwyer 's name is often invoked in the routine that some like to go through, where they complain about wind-up threads being better in the olden days so let's see how he measures up; the pressure is on.
If it continues as it has started, he’s merely going to end up on a lot of people’s ignore lists
And, perma-banned, the editor doesn't seem impressed with his behaviour.
phildwyer 's name is often invoked in the routine that some like to go through, where they complain about wind-up threads being better in the olden days so let's see how he measures up; the pressure is on.
As I said, the pressure is on.You are the principal dipstick against whom he will be measured.
Phil's mistake is spray-gunning over serious topics whereas you have the sense and decency to provide your own material.As I said, the pressure is on.
I'd encourage editor to continue following him round the boards banning him from any thread he makes an arse of himself on.
that might not leave many threads ...I'd encourage editor to continue following him round the boards banning him from any thread he makes an arse of himself on.
that might not leave many threads ...
Worth a read::
Bakhmut, Before It Vanished
The world first heard of my hometown only after Russia destroyed it.www.theatlantic.com
No sharper than the ones already on Moscow ...And so London comes into sharp focus on the nuclear crosshairs....
No sharper than the ones already on Moscow ...
Putin's not likely to commit suicide
They don't really, only against a country on the verge of defeat who weren't themselves armed with nuclear weapons.But tbh I'm more worried about the USA going nuclear. They have form in this regard after all.
They don't really, only against a country on the verge of defeat who weren't themselves armed with nuclear weapons.
Ruthless and reckless applies to so many world leaders, now and in the past. We've all been at their mercy for yonks. I just don't see the US likely right now to risk everything by going nuclear.But it revealed a ruthlessness and recklessness that has characterized US foreign policy ever since. It only takes one nutter in a position of power, and there are plenty of them in and around the US government at the moment. People like Bolton and Pompeo are crazy enough to do it.