The39thStep
Urban critical thinker
Calmer than you dudeIn future times, hundreds of years after... today, a new race of people... Will probably write several papers on niche references in online communities.
Ok, that was very laboured.
Calmer than you dudeIn future times, hundreds of years after... today, a new race of people... Will probably write several papers on niche references in online communities.
Ok, that was very laboured.
The perfect second-album-name he himself can never now useBizarre gardening accident
As I've been told, the West understands full well. The Ukrainians just seem to have a rather optimistic notion of what can be done with raw recruits in 5 weeks. Yes, it's more important to teach them not to shoot each other than it is to teach about mine-clearing - which is something left for specialised units anyhow. Raw recruits shouldn't be clearing mines. You're not hearing these complaints out of the elite units of experienced soldiers that got several months worth of training.Interesting look at NATO training from a Ukrainian viewpoint
‘The West doesn’t understand how we are fighting’
Western instructors don’t understand the kind of war or enemy that we’re fighting, say Ukrainian soldierswww.opendemocracy.net
As you've been told by who?As I've been told, the West understands full well. The Ukrainians just seem to have a rather optimistic notion of what can be done with raw recruits in 5 weeks. Yes, it's more important to teach them not to shoot each other than it is to teach about mine-clearing - which is something left for specialised units anyhow. Raw recruits shouldn't be clearing mines. You're not hearing these complaints out of the elite units of experienced soldiers that got several months worth of training.
Pah Princess Diana did it and she didnt have much training. Prince Andrew could probably do it no sweatAs I've been told, the West understands full well. The Ukrainians just seem to have a rather optimistic notion of what can be done with raw recruits in 5 weeks. Yes, it's more important to teach them not to shoot each other than it is to teach about mine-clearing - which is something left for specialised units anyhow. Raw recruits shouldn't be clearing mines. You're not hearing these complaints out of the elite units of experienced soldiers that got several months worth of training.
Interesting look at NATO training from a Ukrainian viewpoint
‘The West doesn’t understand how we are fighting’
Western instructors don’t understand the kind of war or enemy that we’re fighting, say Ukrainian soldierswww.opendemocracy.net
I think the main beef in that article is the one size fits all approach that meets with NATO accreditation . Obviously, Ukraine's need for fresh troops does impose time constraints on what can be delivered however its very useful and valid feedback to providers.The whole bloody war is a mess, in view of the time available, I am not surprised Ukrainian troops are only getting limited basic training, but from other reports, they still seem better trained than Russian conscripts, poor fuckers on both sides.
Yes, that's him.As you've been told by who?
Interesting look at NATO training from a Ukrainian viewpoint
‘The West doesn’t understand how we are fighting’
Western instructors don’t understand the kind of war or enemy that we’re fighting, say Ukrainian soldierswww.opendemocracy.net
Ta , useful comments although I do worry at times that you’ll get addicted to Call of Duty before long .At the risk of outing myself (again) as a walting armchair general, this episode 'Training the Ukrainians in Urban Warfare' for the UWP podcast has some more information on some of the problems faced when training Ukrainians that are also related the the 'west's' way of doing things. (Ended up listening to this podcast after reading the David Kilcullen Out of the Mountains book that's been mentioned on here.
They discuss the dominance of 'special forces' thinking (and ways of equipping individual soldiers) in the NATO training that go with the SF mindset of war being high speed, light and mostly about room clearing etc. and forgetting some of the old lessons that are more relevant to the fighting in Ukraine. Some interesting reasons hinted at for this as well; the imagery and 'cool' factor for example.
Urban Warfare Project Podcast - Modern War Institute
mwi.westpoint.edu
Ta , useful comments although I do worry at times that you’ll get addicted to Call of Duty before long .
Still two new issues (plus a pair of reprints) every fortnight!I blame Action Man and Commando comics myself.
I think the main beef in that article is the one size fits all approach that meets with NATO accreditation . Obviously, Ukraine's need for fresh troops does impose time constraints on what can be delivered however its very useful and valid feedback to providers.
Yeah sure, But at least the Ukrainians are getting good quality NATO Weapons and don’t have to make do with Shovels like those Russiansthey still seem better trained than Russian conscripts, poor fuckers on both sides.
yeah he should have turned the reference up to 11, innit.Very subtle , prob too subtle for some on here .
Have you got to the Sven Hassel stage yet?I blame Action Man and Commando comics myself.
Archived version:Know your enemy . Step by step tactics for defeating The Red Army according to this article
Ukraine cannot win against Russia now, but victory by 2025 is possible
Allies must ramp up weapons production to give Kyiv the means to overpower Moscow once and for allwww.ft.com
Archived version:
Ukraine cannot win against Russia now, but victory by 2025 is possible
However this may not bode well:
The U.S. and Europe Are Splitting Over Ukraine
what i wonder is how much kyiv actually wants all its territory back. obviously zelensky's set out his stall, but aside from the amount of rebuilding and demining needed, there'd be a great cost in terms of security as well, given that a lot of people in crimea and the other territory russia's held since 2014 will be invested in that regime and by no means certain to return their allegiance to kyiv. once major operations are concluded doesn't mean peace and harmony, it'd mean the beginning of a second effort to regain what the americans call the human terrain, and i wonder what energy and resources zelensky and his successors would have for a counterinsurgency campaignKnow your enemy . Step by step tactics for defeating The Red Army according to this article
Ukraine cannot win against Russia now, but victory by 2025 is possible
Allies must ramp up weapons production to give Kyiv the means to overpower Moscow once and for allwww.ft.com
In worst case scenario, a Trump victory could see US openly allying with Putin and right wing populists throughout Europe like Orban in an effort to break apart and dominate the EU. This would be... very bad.
I hope you are right...I really can't see that happening. Trump isn't going to be President again, for starters.
I'm not sure this is right:Know your enemy . Step by step tactics for defeating The Red Army according to this article
Ukraine cannot win against Russia now, but victory by 2025 is possible
Allies must ramp up weapons production to give Kyiv the means to overpower Moscow once and for allwww.ft.com
Ukraine doesn't need to reach the sea. They just need to get close enough to the main supply lines - which are not right on the coast. Some info in this article:Progress is about eight miles with another 55 miles to go (through three lines of defences) before reaching the sea. The aim is to cut the land bridge to Crimea. To the north and south of Bakhmut, advances amount to about five miles with 10 miles to the Russian main defensive line and 60 miles to the border.
I'm not sure this is right:
Ukraine doesn't need to reach the sea. They just need to get close enough to the main supply lines - which are not right on the coast. Some info in this article:
Also, the Ukranians keep getting longer and longer range weapons - both Western donated and home-made.Why Ukraine could be just 15km from forcing Putin to make an impossible choice
Progress in Ukraine's counteroffensive has been slower than expected, but its forces are building momentum in the country's south, and could be just 15 kilometres away from a major prize.www.abc.net.au
this may come back to haunt you: and of course the rest of us. i wish i could share your optimismI really can't see that happening. Trump isn't going to be President again, for starters.
I can't see the Russian state tolerating the loss of Crimea. And that goes double for Putin, if that goes I would think that's the end of him as well. So what will happen if it looks like that loss is an increasing possibility? I have no idea, but I don't think it's all going to be plan sailing if Ukraine keeps making gains, especially ones that threaten the Russian control of Crimea.
what i wonder is how much kyiv actually wants all its territory back. obviously zelensky's set out his stall, but aside from the amount of rebuilding and demining needed, there'd be a great cost in terms of security as well, given that a lot of people in crimea and the other territory russia's held since 2014 will be invested in that regime and by no means certain to return their allegiance to kyiv. once major operations are concluded doesn't mean peace and harmony, it'd mean the beginning of a second effort to regain what the americans call the human terrain, and i wonder what energy and resources zelensky and his successors would have for a counterinsurgency campaign
yeh. i expand on the point after the first sentence, which appears to be the only one you read.As opposed to faking it? The hit on their economy, and Russia's war on their economy, which likely will not stop, have to be convincing.
Russia is destroying Ukraine’s economy, raising costs for U.S. and allies
The economic impacts of Russia–Ukraine War export disruptions of grain commodities