I get the feeling that I'm not going to win you round to my point of view that Russian soldiers have a lot more agency than people trapped in the crush at Hillsborough, making your analogy a crass one, so probably not much point in discussing it further.
The comparison with Hillsborough was made in response to something quite specific, the suggestion that in the case of the bombing, the loss of life was tragic but the mistakes made by the commanders were funny.
I don't think any mistakes, made by those in power, who ought to know better, that result in a bunch of people losing their lives, are funny.
It's not funny that it happened at Hillsborough, it's not funny that it's happening all the time in the war in Ukraine.
When that comparison was made, the agency of the victims wasn't in discussion.
I don't see it as a crass comparison because in neither case do I see any reason to assume that those who died had done anything that would justify their death.
Given what (I thought) we know about Russia, and how it is run, and the bigger picture of who is steering this war I find it a little surprising that we have people questioning whether it's really such a big deal to dodge the draft there. Why is it that so much of Russia's cannon fodder is recruited from its poorer regions - perhaps moral standards are higher in the wealthy?
The implication behind some comments that these soldiers, who we know pretty much nothing about, maybe kind of a bit deserved to die because we know some Russian soldiers before them have committed atrocities... that's sort of disturbing too.