planetgeli
There's no future in England's dreaming
Enough. You're spoiling the war.
And Thereby hangs a tale, only time will tell if you stick to that. But people will turn a blind eye. Still this derail has been a wasted hour.Unlike you I am not an archer afficionado
Urban Fantasy to be sure and they were pretty good. I prefer Aaronovitch for that though.I do like the Robert Rankin books , especially The Brentford Trilogy, which are sort of fantasy.
ignoring George macdonald, William Morris, lord Dunsany, James branch cabell and e.r. eddison, all of who published fantasy before Tolkien, as did Robert e howard in the pages of eg weird tales.Tolkien was the first to go mainstream, as we would describe it now, indeed some have argued he created the genre, and whilst they would be wrong, that certainly is seen as his place in literature. Mind I don’t actually like Fantasy that much. Having read the LOTR books twice I’m not sure I ever will again. But then The only fantasy I’d go back to is Pratchett and, arguably he isn’t really fantasy, so what do I know. ( I do like Martin’s SF though TBF).
On Screen The first few series of GOT is far more entertaining than LOTR , what with humour, proper characters and fucking.
East of Ealing is a masterpieceI do like the Robert Rankin books , especially The Brentford Trilogy, which are sort of fantasy.
ignoring George macdonald, William Morris, lord Dunsany, James branch cabell and e.r. eddison, all of who published fantasy before Tolkien, as did Robert e howard in the pages of eg weird tales.
Yes indeed, as would those be who'd say he was the first to go mainstreamIndeed. Which is why those who say he created the genre would be wrong.
Best take it up with them then.
There's an argument that Lucian of Samosa might have been the first...Yes indeed, as would those be who'd say he was the first to go mainstream
Him or apuleiusThere's an argument that Lucian of Samosa might have been the first...
Stop derailing this literary thread.Russia launches biggest drone attack yet on Kyiv as city marks its founding
Ukraine says it shot down 52 Iranian-made devices but debris killed one person and injured twowww.theguardian.com
What's the cheapest way of taking out drones I wonder. Can Russia keep doing this indefinitely. Iran will obviously want to keep some of their production for themselves.
I think Gepard seems to hit the sweet spot between cost and effectiveness. Judging by the footage from Kyiv last night (and the hit rate), they're doing a pretty good job, at a fairly minimal per-round cost.Russia launches biggest drone attack yet on Kyiv as city marks its founding
Ukraine says it shot down 52 Iranian-made devices but debris killed one person and injured twowww.theguardian.com
What's the cheapest way of taking out drones I wonder. Can Russia keep doing this indefinitely. Iran will obviously want to keep some of their production for themselves.
Russia launches biggest drone attack yet on Kyiv as city marks its founding
Ukraine says it shot down 52 Iranian-made devices but debris killed one person and injured twowww.theguardian.com
What's the cheapest way of taking out drones I wonder. Can Russia keep doing this indefinitely. Iran will obviously want to keep some of their production for themselves.
As long as the gunners / operators can get the angle of deflection correct, then gepards or heavy-ish machine guns will do the job.Russia launches biggest drone attack yet on Kyiv as city marks its founding
Ukraine says it shot down 52 Iranian-made devices but debris killed one person and injured twowww.theguardian.com
What's the cheapest way of taking out drones I wonder. Can Russia keep doing this indefinitely. Iran will obviously want to keep some of their production for themselves.
There are several skirmishes going on here as well as the warEnough. You're spoiling the war.
There are several skirmishes going on here as well as the war
I don't suppose there's a poster on this thread who hasn't heard of conan the barbarian, Robert e Howard's famous creation. And mainstream now is different to mainstream in their day, eg James branch cabell and e.r. eddison were well known in their day, while Lord dunsany's fame persists and works by him remain in print many decades after his deathI’d stand by that. None of the fine authors you quote can really be described as mainstream beyond genre fiction.
Who ?I don't suppose there's a poster on this thread who hasn't heard of conan the barbarian, Robert e Howard's famous creation. And mainstream now is different to mainstream in their day, eg James branch cabell and e.r. eddison were well known in their day, while Lord dunsany's fame persists and works by him remain in print many decades after his death
Stop derailing this literary thread.
Helpful input from the UCU
Jeffrey Archer?
Eskov bases his novel on the premise that the Tolkien account is a "history written by the victors". Eskov's version of the story describes Mordor as a peaceful constitutional monarchy on the verge of an industrial revolution, that poses a threat to the war-mongering and imperialistic faction represented by Gandalf (whose attitude has been described by Saruman as "crafting the Final Solution to the Mordorian problem") and the racist elves.
Fellowship of the Ring's fault.Sorry to get back to the fantasy but remember this Russian sequel to LOTR being quite good: The Last Ringbearer
Helpful input from the UCU
I think when he started he did do the first drafts but they were so poorly put together that they needed massive editing. Now, I've read, he just comes up with a synopsis.Archer, famously, does not even write his books. They are just churned out under his name. Unsure as to whether this was always the case, but it has been for some time.