T & P
|-o-| (-o-) |-o-|
Looking forward to the 'serious consequences' statement by the KremlinMeanwhile, in current Ukraine war developments:
Ukraine to be supplied Storm Shadow cruise missiles by the UK
Looking forward to the 'serious consequences' statement by the KremlinMeanwhile, in current Ukraine war developments:
Ukraine to be supplied Storm Shadow cruise missiles by the UK
So true....in Poland the dominant Law and Justice Party (accurately abbreviated to PiS) have been trading on anti-Russian/Communist sentiment for years. Their central electoral message was one of finding any remnants of Russian State-sympathetic elements within the Polish state bureaucracy from the Soviet era and getting them out. This is coupled with a rampant strain of openly anti-semitic Catholicism that has been poisoning Poland since the fall of the wall, and was propagated very successfully by the once very popular radio station Radio Maryja. PiS PM Jarosław Kaczyński was a regular guest.Memory in my experience is frequently used by the state, by political actors etc sometimes to divide, and sometimes to unite. The whole question of memory is a disputed one, hence the attempt in some countries where there has been generational divide and even civil war to try and find truth and reconciliation concerning uncomfortable histories. My later post was a suggestion that it is possible to construct a narrative that recognises the complexities of victims under both fascist and Soviet regimes that allows us to have those difficult conversations.
Sounds like absolute chaos around Bakhmut. All sorts of claims and counter claims going on.
Even the Russians are now saying the UA have reclaimed up to 3k of territory and its all down to bad comms and power struggles.
Sounds like absolute chaos around Bakhmut. All sorts of claims and counter claims going on.
Even the Russians are now saying the UA have reclaimed up to 3k of territory and its all down to bad comms and power struggles.
The boss of Russian mercenary group Wagner, Yevgeny Prigozhin, accused a Russian brigade of abandoning its position in front-line Bakhmut, allowing Ukraine to seize territory.
The remarks are the latest in a series of public criticisms from him of Moscow’s Ministry of Defense for the faltering invasion of Ukraine – and, in particular, the failure to capture the city of Bakhmut. But while Prigozhin has frequently poured scorn on the Russian military and its leadership, he has not previously accused Russian units of running from battle and allowing Ukrainian forces to recapture territory.
Prigozhin said the 72nd brigade “just ran the hell out of there.”
Responding to questions from a Russian media outlet, Prigozhin said: “There is a serious risk of encirclement of PMC Wagner in Bakhmut as a result of the failure of the flanks. The flanks are already cracking and falling through.”
“At the moment, within the city of Bakhmut, there is only Wagner PMC, there are no other units. Outside Bakhmut [there is] only the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. PMC Wagner is not there,” he said.
TBF it's been chaos around Bakhmut for about 9 months now,
Oh I know that but it looks like it is now disintegrating into absolute chaos...not organised chaos.
Looks pretty solid that Ukr will withdraw from Bakhmut, they are hemmed in, and the Ru having been making incremental advances on the flanks to the point where they could get surrounded.
That said: the Russians have paid an astonishing price for a town the size of East Kilbride (insert joke here..) that has been levelled to the point where it looks like Ypres in 1917. We think the Russians have suffered about 10,000 casualties within 5 miles of Bakhmut, and that given what Russian battlefield medicine is like, that means 8,000+ fatalities.
We think that (roughly) the Bakhmut front has used about 1 in 3 of every single Russian artillery shell fired in Ukraine in the last month, and 1 in 2 of every fast jet or attack helicopter sortie flown over Ukraine.
We think that something like 50-60% of the entire Russian Spring offensive in Ukraine has been used up to get to the point where Bakhmut falls.
Ukraine has certainly taken casualties, and they have started to rise significantly as the Russian pincer movement has got tighter - Ukraine has been using Bakhmut as a meat grinder for the Russian Army, and has done so very successfully, but it's starting to cost them more than they can afford to keep it going.
The question now is timing - within the next week would be my take from the messaging - and whether Ukraine can complete a fighting withdrawal from the pocket and keep it's force there intact and able to fight another day, or whether the pocket will be destroyed with the Ukrainians still in there.
I'd put reasonable money on the former, not least because the Ukrainians have shown themselves able to conduct hugely complex ground operations, and the Russians just haven't - I don't see the Russian inf/armour as being able to constantly push the Ukr while they withdraw and be able to keep the artillery on the Ukrainians as they move. Usually the Ru go in two stages - artillery first, blast the shit out of everything, then stop fires and let the Inf/armour move forward. Doing both at the same time in a coordinated fashion seems beyond them.
It will be a disappointment to Ukr, but in purely military terms it's done it's job - it's blunted the much feared Ru spring offensive, and now the Ukrainians have got bigger fish to fry. They have their own spring offensive, they've got lots of new tanks, guns and IFV to do it with, and they simply need all the manpower and fires they can get to to be able to take advantage of the gains they think they can make through manouvere warfare.
Compared to that, losing Bakhmut is small beer.
Don't feel too bad - it's not the worst prediction we've had on here. Take this one from March last year:Ageing like spilt milk... Two months.
The war will likely be settled in ten days with a ceasefire agreement and settlement on Russian terms.
Innit.Don't feel too bad - it's not the worst prediction we've had on here. Take this one from March last year:
I thought you'd be able to pick out your 23211 without any help from me. The only thing that's bizarre here is your 'and did he keep his word?' - not I think the first question that'd leap into most people's mindsI asked where?. This is bizarre, even by your standards.
And all because of that fucking egotistical clown Putin.Innit.
I think the only reasonable prediction now is lots more people will be killed and more stuff smashed up.
No not all because of Putin.And all because of that fucking egotistical clown Putin.
Oh you're replying to me now, Great. Perhaps you could answer this:No not all because of Putin.
Err, we were discussing what Russia did to Poland during WW2 and I posted up a shocking example that's in the news today.
And I read the full article. And now that I've answered your questions, perhaps you could offer your thoughts on Russia massacring 21,000 Polish prisoners of war, denying it for 47 years and silencing the families of the murdered?
So true....in Poland the dominant Law and Justice Party (accurately abbreviated to PiS)
Innit.
I think the only reasonable prediction now is lots more people will be killed and more stuff smashed up.
Where did I say he was a man of honour?. I’m asking a question of you.I thought you'd be able to pick out your 23211 without any help from me. The only thing that's bizarre here is your 'and did he keep his word?' - not I think the first question that'd leap into most people's minds
So he stuck to what was agreed?.
No not all because of Putin.
So I see. Maybe you should revise it. After all, I never said you said thatWhere did I say he was a man of honour?. I’m asking a question of you.
Sadly yes, unless Russia withdraws, which is the only logical way for this bloody war to be concluded.
You seem to think Ukraine should just agree to a ceasefire on Russian terms, but Russia is not even offering any terms to a ceasefire, so their only option is to send the invaders packing.
I know you have been asked time and time again how you think it could be ended, and you have never, not once, offered any idea of how that can happen.
But, I'll ask yet again, WTF do you think can bring this to an end?
Now that's proper bizarre. The government - not normally known for its keen grasp of current events - recognises the culpability of many russians for the war through their sanctioning so many prominent oligarchs like abramovich etc. But for you it's all putin. Back in the day you'd have said no doubt it's all bush's fault for the '03 invasion of Iraq, ignoring eg blair's enabling and support for the farrago of fibs and rumsfeld, Cheney and wolfowitz's efforts to get the war going after 9/11. No one person, not even putin, is 100% to blame for where we are now with Ukraine, no matter how much you think they are. This is a team effort with lots of people being denied the recognition they deserve. Must be comforting seeing things so simplistically thoAnd all because of that fucking egotistical clown Putin.
Now that's proper bizarre. The government - not normally known for its keen grasp of current events - recognises the culpability of many russians for the war through their sanctioning so many prominent oligarchs like abramovich etc. But for you it's all putin. Back in the day you'd have said no doubt it's all bush's fault for the '03 invasion of Iraq, ignoring eg blair's enabling and support for the farrago of fibs and rumsfeld, Cheney and wolfowitz's efforts to get the war going after 9/11. No one person, not even putin, is 100% to blame for where we are now with Ukraine, no matter how much you think they are. This is a team effort with lots of people being denied the recognition they deserve. Must be comforting seeing things so simplistically tho
This is bizarre. I’m leaving you to it.So I see. Maybe you should revise it. After all, I never said you said that
That makes it all the more peculiar to see you suggest he was a man of honour.
What place does logic have in war? Logically wars should never start, certainly not wars which appear founded on a belief system built on very shifting sands. And wars take on lives of their own, going ways no one expected them too - it'd have been a brave person who'd have predicted in February last year the conflict's result would still be in doubt now. There's no way for this war to end atm bar the departure of one side from the battlefield through eg change of government or mutiny. There's no way forward as you point out through an armistice atm. So there's no way to go but onwards, and it'll by quite some time before this act of sheer irrationality ends in a logical - or other - waySadly yes, unless Russia withdraws, which is the only logical way for this bloody war to be concluded.
You seem to think Ukraine should just agree to a ceasefire on Russian terms, but Russia is not even offering any terms to a ceasefire, so their only option is to send the invaders packing.
I know you have been asked time and time again how you think it could be ended, and you have never, not once, offered any idea of how that can happen.
But, I'll ask yet again, WTF do you think can bring this to an end?
Yes, that doesn't say what you claimed it said, does itThis is bizarre. I’m leaving you to it.
Yes, wars are always caused by the actual order to begin hostilities.Yet if Putin hadn't ordered the invasion it wouldn't have happened.
HTH
It takes a lot to get on my ignore list. Well done.Yes, that doesn't say what you claimed it said, does it
If the Russian military had been capable the invasion would have succeeded. Everyone would have evinced sadness, as they did at the time of the occupation of the Donbas and Crimea, but then it would have been business as usual and Putin would have been at the Coronation.Yet if Putin hadn't ordered the invasion it wouldn't have happened.
HTH
You say that like I should give a shitIt takes a lot to get on my ignore list. Well done.