FabricLiveBaby!
Live Baby Fabric!
Which is better? Werewolves or Vampires? Or Zombies? Or are they all crap?
Werewolves. Dogs are cute.
Which is better? Werewolves or Vampires? Or Zombies? Or are they all crap?
Do you know what an occupation is?I cry no tears for dead Azov Nazis.
How about address how half of those killed in the Holocaust died in Poland and the indifference at best of much of the Polish population to this, and at worst actively hunting down those deemed to die?
Interesting. I wouldn't want to tarnish every Latvian with a duty to explain Latvia in WW2 however as a senior diplomat did she address the issue of the holocaust in Latvia and fighting for the Nazis? What did she think of NATO and Russia signing up to the Partnership for Peace programme in the 1990s ?
( I appreciate that this was your work role so it may not have been pertinent for you to raise such issues)
If you're going to bring up what Russia did to Poland there's more history than you make out. Your line sounds good till it's given a moment's thought.I try to keep my Whataboutisms within a century or so.
I mean, I live in Poland, am half Hungarian, and am married to a half-pole.
And I could give my insight, but personally I'd rather listen to a washed out 50 something British trade unionist bloke on the REAL reason why Russia is so great.
F**k off, Russia was happy to carve up Europe with Hitler and sell him the fuel and materials to invade western europe.Hardens attitudes reading shit like that.
I think you'll find Russia carved up Europe with the UK and USA. By contrast, stalin merely carved up Poland with hitlerF**k off, Russia was happy to carve up Europe with Hitler and sell him the fuel and materials to invade western europe.
Only Poland?I think you'll find Russia carved up Europe with the UK and USA. By contrast, stalin merely carved up Poland with hitler
You're right, I should have mentioned the baltic states and you should have mentioned yalta.Only Poland?
No, because we can talk about what Stalin did or what Putin is doing by itself. No need to minimise it.You're right, I should have mentioned the baltic states and you should have mentioned yalta.
What stalin did in 1939 or what stalin did in 1945-49? You know about the latter, the bit you're minimising by refusing to talk about itNo, because we can talk about what Stalin did or what Putin is doing by itself. No need to minimise it.
Appreciate that in work that those questions would not be permitted.I'll be honest and say that I've found my time in Eastern Europe to be an opportunity to keep my ears open and my hole shut. We - western Europe's - understanding of this stuff is so limited that you could stop pretty much anyone in the street and they'd know more about the stone age, nuclear physics, and molecular biology than they'd know about Eastern Europe in the 20th century.
Yes, as you say, it's not my place to ask difficult questions about Latvians in the SS, and I know there's a great deal of convenient airbrushing, sweeping under the carpet, and blame shifting in the 'Great Big Book of History' that's been written (rewritten?) since the Sovs collapsed - that said, from living out here for a year now (I live as a civilian, in town, I shop in town, eat in town, spend free time seeing the sights or walking in the mountains) I'd absolutely say that the emnity towards the Russians (as opposed to just the Soviets) is a deep, endless, historic and yet very personal. The emnity towards the Germans (as opposed to just the Nazis) is there as well, and its not to be dismissed. The Germans are partners, but they are not friends.
The bit where he said “Never mind. We'll do it our own way later."What stalin did in 1939 or what stalin did in 1945-49? You know about the latter, the bit you're minimising by refusing to talk about it
Soz you've lost me now, which post are you referring to?The bit where he said “Never mind. We'll do it our own way later."
I’m replying to yours. What did he do in 45-49?Soz you've lost me now, which post are you referring to?
1) agreed division of Europe with us/UKI’m replying to yours. What did he do in 45-49?
Speaking as a half-Pole, I'm ashamed to say that there's no way I could keep it either polite or contributing in any way to the discussion. So, unlike some, I have the sense to keep my trap shut.It's a shame we don't seem to have any Polish posters who could share their thoughts on shrugging off Soviet atrocities and blaming Poles for the Holocaust
So he stuck to what was agreed?.1) agreed division of Europe with us/UK
2) put it into effect
That's not the point, of course. Surprised to see you bigging up stalin as a man of his word, by the by.So he stuck to what was agreed?.
I'm not a fan of his at all, are you?That's not the point, of course. Surprised to see you bigging up stalin as a man of his word, by the by.
That makes it all the more peculiar to see you suggest he was a man of honour.I'm not a fan of his at all, are you?
Where did I do this?That makes it all the more peculiar to see you suggest he was a man of honour.
On this very threadWhere did I do this?
I asked where?. This is bizarre, even by your standards.On this very thread
Stop derailing the threadMeanwhile, in current Ukraine war developments:
Ukraine to be supplied Storm Shadow cruise missiles by the UK