From the amusing (above) to the heart-breaking
I try to from time to time - those who think that everyone with an interest in what's going on in Ukraine are just armchair generals viewing War Porn can go and do one.That's a fucking rough watch man. Imagine living it. I can't.
Why does the war in Ukraine affect you so much compared to other wars? What are the key differences?I try to from time to time - those who think that everyone with an interest in what's going on in Ukraine are just armchair generals viewing War Porn can go and do one.
I have never, in my life, been as affected by the impact on people affected by war as I have been by what is happening in Ukraine. I vacillate between rage, sorrow, and heartbreak. Sometimes, watching vatniks getting blown to bits is a slight solace.
Is vatnicks a NAFO term?I try to from time to time - those who think that everyone with an interest in what's going on in Ukraine are just armchair generals viewing War Porn can go and do one.
I have never, in my life, been as affected by the impact on people affected by war as I have been by what is happening in Ukraine. I vacillate between rage, sorrow, and heartbreak. Sometimes, watching vatniks getting blown to bits is a slight solace.
The demo I saw on a RN documentary they simply threw a coke can into its line of fire and it shot it down. Good look with lobbing a coke can at 100+ mph.It's a speed thing again. Anything that can target a small object like that is designed to take out incoming shells and rockets. The software will need to be rewritten because it will (quite logically, given the original context) refuse to target something as slow as a drone. Otherwise the RSPB would get awfully upset at them.
A simple solution
I regret that the Ukrainians may not be given any choice in the matter. The "mood music" in the mainstream media seems to have shifted recently. There's a school of thought that the pawns are the most important pieces in chess - but I think that may only apply to chess.Putin is now saying that a precondition for any talks is that the West, and presumably Ukraine, recognise their recent annexations. So agree not to negotiate about the things you need to negotiate about in the first place. And some people wonder why Ukrainians are reluctant to talk to the fucker.
He is 5 years older. His personal grip on power is more tenuous. The inner core of the Siloviki (the ex KGB people like Patrushev, Bortnikov and Naryshkin) are not in danger of loosing power, but he may simply cease to be the leader and merely a figurehead. He has no exit stratagy from the job, other than putting a weak outer member like Lavrov or Medvedev into the job, but they can be the placemen for others in the core group anyway. So by launching the war and making sure everyone of the main power brokers was on TV supporting it (that wibble session he had just before launching it) was likely a way to shoring up his personal power in the elite cliques.Given the massive amount of US military aid to Ukraine and how that is, without question, keeping them in the game, it does beg the question: why didn't Putin do this in 2017?
Ukrainian forces killed another 510 Russian troops on Friday, bringing the total number of soldiers lost by Russia since the invasion to 90,600.
They also downed another eight drones and managed to take out a tank, according to statistics provided by the Ukrainian general staff of the armed forces.
Plus
Ukraine war: Zelensky aide reveals up to 13,000 war dead
The interesting bit for me is how Der Leyen did a press conference in which she quoted '100k Ukrainian military officers killed so far' and then her Political Communication unit had to release a cut version omitting those figures.
Wouldn't rule that explanation out tbh , despite the Directorate-General for Communication having over 200 staff and a budget of 10m euros, we have all seen errors by other world leaders. They also cut out of the revised video the claim that 20k Ukrainian citizens have been killed. but I think that may have been due to them wanting the edited version to flow.From the BBC: In a video address on Wednesday, EU Commission head Ursula Von der Leyen said that 100,000 Ukrainian troops had been killed. However a spokesperson for the EU Commission later clarified that this was a mistake, and the figure referred to those both killed and injured.
"Von der Leyen confuses number of casualties with number of people killed" seems a likelier explanation than "Ukraine was concealing the real number of soldiers killed but they unwisely shared it with Von der Leyen, who revealed it at her next press conference."
We've all been there after a messy night out.
Ukraine never had 100k officers to begin with, so the statement was clearly not correct.Wouldn't rule that explanation out tbh , despite the Directorate-General for Communication having over 200 staff and a budget of 10m euros, we have all seen errors by other world leaders. They also cut out of the revised video the claim that 20k Ukrainian citizens have been killed. but I think that may have been due to them wanting the edited version to flow.