Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

Wars never are fought purely between two armies and it's naive to suggest they are
It was a nightmare post tbh. I cut a load at the beginning about Putin's possible aims targetting civilian's and infrastructure then couldn't tie that to the above sufficiently without making it sound like it only applied if he failed in his aims hitting those targets and then couldn't get the phrasing right at the end to take account of what you highlight. So I thought fuck this, pressed post and had me tea. So I'd go lazy and an often obvious inability to communicate effectively rather than naive.
 
Vladimir Makey, Belarus foreign affairs minister has died suddenly and the conspiracy theories are flying.

I didn't hear anything about him being unwell. Well since the regime sold its soul to Russia, perhaps "unexpected" deaths are part of the price to be paid. I think he would have stood a good chance of replacing Lukashenka had he outlived him.
 
Given the massive amount of US military aid to Ukraine and how that is, without question, keeping them in the game, it does beg the question: why didn't Putin do this in 2017?
I think it could literally be as simple as him having nothing better to do during Covid than pore over old maps and watch WW2 movies etc. Nah but seriously I think he's got much more unhinged and detached from reality the last few years
 
If you're hinting at Trump he may not have felt it necessary to make any big moves when this could swing the US against him. Any concerns about NATO would have been far from his mind given Trumps attitude toward it.
 
Whats the electricity situation like in Ukraine now? I noticed that on Novermber 25th the IAEA said the other nuclear plants got reconnected to the grid again:

you might try but it doesn't seem to be going up today
 
Whats the electricity situation like in Ukraine now? I noticed that on Novermber 25th the IAEA said the other nuclear plants got reconnected to the grid again:

I rather assumed that when they said "connected to the grid" it was more about supplying power TO them than them supplying power. I guess that they can't really risk bringing them back to an active (non-shutdown) state in case grid connection is lost and they have to do the whole shutdown thing only without power :(
 
As if war isn't shit enough, winter is about to make it a whole load worse.

Fairly good thread on effect of winter by Jack Watling at RUSI...

If you can't be arsed to read it: winter makes everything more difficult. Logistics breaks down because logistics means wheels, and mud means no wheels. Troops living in the field who have poor leadership, training or morale tend to suffer badly in winter, and become ineffective.

 
I rather assumed that when they said "connected to the grid" it was more about supplying power TO them than them supplying power. I guess that they can't really risk bringing them back to an active (non-shutdown) state in case grid connection is lost and they have to do the whole shutdown thing only without power :(
Unlike Zaporizhzhya, these other plants have been producing power except for the periods where their connections were knocked out etc. For example that IAEA statement says:

Ukraine today also confirmed to the IAEA that the three other nuclear power plants – Rivne, South Ukraine and Khmelnytskyy – had been re-connected to the grid and were operating to generate electricity for the country’s needs. Power had also been restored to the Chornobyl site, it said.
 
Fairly good thread on effect of winter by Jack Watling at RUSI...

If you can't be arsed to read it: winter makes everything more difficult. Logistics breaks down because logistics means wheels, and mud means no wheels. Troops living in the field who have poor leadership, training or morale tend to suffer badly in winter, and become ineffective.



Yup. That does sound really shit.
 
Back
Top Bottom