Preferable to being a snotty patronising arsewipe.Oh, you poor misunderstood victim.
Preferable to being a snotty patronising arsewipe.Oh, you poor misunderstood victim.
frozen bank a/c sanctions or slap on the wrist editor sanctions?I have, and now I can’t because I got sanctioned for it.
if there's three things existentialist is not they're being snotty, patronising or an arsewipe.Preferable to being a snotty patronising arsewipe.
What? Any three things?if there's three things existentialist is not they're being snotty, patronising or an arsewipe.
there are other things he's not too, he's not a circus gymnast, or a collector of birds' fecal sacks for example.What? Any three things?
I was just highlighting your ambiguous grammar, I know there are many things they're not.there are other things he's not too, he's not a circus gymnast, or a collector of birds' fecal sacks for example.
I wouldn't knowPreferable to being a snotty patronising arsewipe.
if you've been reduced to highlighting people's ambiguous grammar you need to get out moreI was just highlighting your ambiguous grammar, I know there are many things they're not.
If there's three things not to be reduced to, it's highlights, ambiguous grammar and getting outif you've been reduced to highlighting people's ambiguous grammar you need to get out more
I have, and now I can’t because I got sanctioned for it.
Where did I say I meant him?if there's three things existentialist is not they're being snotty, patronising or an arsewipe.
Whilst they were searching for rules I’d broken, no less.I think you got the warning for arguing with the person in question, not for voicing your opinions
it was very strongly suggested by your post, maybe you meant someone else in which case please share your intended targetWhere did I say I meant him?
you don't know that thoughthere are other things he's not too, he's not a circus gymnast, or a collector of birds' fecal sacks for example.
I think apples are preferable to oranges. That doesn’t mean I’m calling you an orange.it was very strongly suggested by your post, maybe you meant someone else in which case please share your intended target
You probably meant to put "sarcastic" in that riposte, too, BTW. I'd have owned that one.Preferable to being a snotty patronising arsewipe.
Perhaps it was you quoting my post in your response which gave the impression you meant, er, himWhere did I say I meant him?
Imperialist running dogI think apples are preferable to oranges. That doesn’t mean I’m calling you an orange.
I expect you were making a contextless reference to imperial running dogs.Imperialist running dog
Doesn't mean I'm calling you an imperialist running dog - or does it?
As opposed to metric ones,I expect you were making a contextless reference to imperial running dogs.
I could have used wanker or professor or dogsbody, it would have made no differenceI expect you were making a contextless reference to imperial running dogs.
Take a week off this thread. I insist!Preferable to being a snotty patronising arsewipe.
I notice it now flags the old posts to say they are banned from the thread. Nice change might stop people quoting someone who can no longer reply.Take a week off this thread. I insist!
i'll go festoon explore documentsI like this idea of having a 'what three words' description for each poster.
Off you go.
There'd be fisticuffs over:I like this idea of having a 'what three words' description for each poster.
piss poorTake a week off this thread. I insist!