Raheem
Well-Known Member
I like the Pope. The Pope's a fucking dope.The anti-imperialist pope
I like the Pope. The Pope's a fucking dope.The anti-imperialist pope
Dmitri Alperovitch reckons he won't - there's nothing to be gained by full mobilisation and much public support to be lost. A long thread here:Could be protracted, but if Russia military continues to degrade at the present rate, it might be over in months.
Nobody predicted Russia would fail to this extent and they may not be able to keep their up this level of warfare.
Read several predictions that putin will order a full mobilisation on the May victory day thing.
Anyone any idea what this might mean in practice?
Not least on the Russian people's support for the war.
This is liz Truss level wishful thinkingI think the longer it goes on the relative military strength will increasingly favour Ukraine. Russia's "big push" in the east has made only incremental progress and likely cost them dearly in men and equipment (and general's). Ukraine can make up its losses much easier and is getting increasing amounts of hi quality kit from the west - including more heavy weapons. Russian forces may soon get to the point where they are no longer capable of carrying out effective offensive operations. Ukraine's counter attacks could increase in number and size to the point where Russia may have to withdraw from large areas of the country.
I think/hope that the issue now is the scale of Russia's defeat - ranging from a stalemate where they can no longer attack but Ukraine isn't strong enough to push them back any further - leading to a ceasefire and "frozen conflict" - to a comprehensive collapse (the latter could be very dangerous as Putin might consider going for nukes if Ukraine starts pushing into Crimea).
How so?This is liz Truss level wishful thinking
Dmitri Alperovitch reckons he won't - there's nothing to be gained by full mobilisation and much public support to be lost. A long thread here:
Maybe this should go on the speculation thread.
The problem with that is that it seems to assume that Putin is looking for an out, I don't see any evidance that he is.
Yeah, we should really take this to the speculation thread. Alperovitch reckons Putin is concerned about his own hold on power and the danger of a coup, which could increase with increased exposure to criticism through conscription. So not so much looking for an out.The problem with that is that it seems to assume that Putin is looking for an out, I don't see any evidance that he is.
The problem with that is that it seems to assume that Putin is looking for an out, I don't see any evidance that he is.
I briefly caught the news at half time in the CL and there was something about a 3 day ceasefire at Azovstal to allow civilians to go. Might have been lost on translation thoughDoes anyone know if any more people got out of the steel works at Azovstal? Russian fighters are known to have stormed the plant. There've also been reports of explosions there.
It was promised earlier, but that's happened before and then people got shot at, so difficult to know.I briefly caught the news at half time in the CL and there was something about a 3 day ceasefire at Azovstal to allow civilians to go. Might have been lost on translation though
Which assumes they want an out, that they want and end to the war. Have we any evidence of that?As he points out though that wouldn't be an out, it would be them achieving a version of the goals they have publicly cited for this that they could sell.
We've been told several times the Russians are about to run out of men and materiel and yet here we are. There's a lot we're not being told about what's going on, and there's stuff we're being told that plainly can't be true or the entire thing would be over.How so?
So far Russian military capability has been consistently and comprehensively overestimated by just about all the analysis I've seen since the start of the war. Based on that they not about to unleash the full force of their army - its already been unleashed and its failed. Ukraine's manpower, capability and weaponry is steadily improving and all the indications are that Russia's is going in the opposite direction - not really a surprise thanks to sanctions for one and steadily increasing levels of aid for the other. Also chuck in Ukraine's noticeable intelligence advantage (thanks to NATO/US) and superior morale, equipment, organisation, tactics and level of training - and the rank incompetence of the Russian military command.
If that continues, than at some point Ukraine will be militarily stronger in the region than Russia and will be able to push back on a greater scale than what we have already seen. Them being in a position to threaten Russian control of Crimea is by no means a certainty - but id say it's well within the realms of reasonable possibility.
Two weeks into the war those speculating that Russia might fail in capturing Kiev were accused of similar "wishful thinking" - yet here we are.
Or anything as abstract as decency or humanity.There seems to be no point in trying to predict Putin's actions any more. The man's clearly gone off the fucking deep end and is not making decisions based on good information or coherent objectives.
Army experts: will the new artillery allow Ukraine to push the Russians back, or will there just be a stalemate? I was hoping that Ukraine would be able to do better counter-battery fire than Russia, with the latest counter-battery radar and guided shells and whatnot, and the Russian artillery would be wiped out.
A long thread here:
have we? There is speculation about how long before that happens - but I don't recall anyone saying its definitely about to happen at any point. Think i read somebody speculating that they would start running into serious shortages by the end of may - presumably by looking at their rate of losses and extrapolating. fuck knows. Im saying - with plenty of caveats - that a comprehensive Russian defeat which pushes them back out of Ukraine and leaves Crimea vulnerable is within a range of reasonable possibility - not that is likely. huge of amount of "fuck knows?" all around. I do think its more likely than Russia capturing Odessa or securing anything like a "victory" though.We've been told several times the Russians are about to run out of men and materiel and yet here we are. There's a lot we're not being told about what's going on, and there's stuff we're being told that plainly can't be true or the entire thing would be over.
... the victory push is to gain control of the Donbas and Kherson so these can be annexed, maybe a goal for May 9th. They’re making slow and costly progress in these areas, but it is progress all the same.
Ukraine regains control over settlements near Kherson, military says. Ukraine has regained control over several settlements surrounding Mykolayiv and Kherson in the country’s south, military officials have said.
Due to the successful actions of Ukrainian defenders, Russian forces “lost control over several settlements on the border of Mykolayiv and Kherson regions,” the latest intelligence report from Ukraine’s general staff of the armed forces reads.
However, heavy fighting continues in Mariupol where Russian occupiers are focusing their efforts on blocking and trying to destroy Ukrainians units stationed in the Azovstal steel works area, officials added.
With the support of aircraft, the enemy resumed the offensive in order to take control of the plant, the report continued.
Russia is also “provoking tensions” in the Transnistrian region of Moldova, Ukraine claimed
There seems to be no point in trying to predict Putin's actions any more. The man's clearly gone off the fucking deep end and is not making decisions based on good information or coherent objectives.
This should be the thread for that. Otherwise what is the thread for?(Just thinking - should there be a thread for just ‘progress of war’ stuff? Like just what is happening on the ground)
It's one thing giving unconditional support to Ukraine in defending against an invasion. It would be another to deny that Western nations are in this to further their own agendas. Parts of the US establishment have seen a showdown with Russia as inevitable and even necessary for a long time.anyway - thought this article was interesting - about the US escalating its involvement and comparing it with Roosevelts lend lease. The scale of US military support for Ukraine is eye popping and so is they rhetoric accompanying it. They are loudly advertising their actions including how they share intel with Ukraine. Definitely quite queasy making.
Is escalation in Ukraine part of the US strategy? | Adam Tooze
Your memory doesn't seem reliable to me. See eg from march 22 Russian invaders have three days of supplies left, says Ukraine militaryhave we? There is speculation about how long before that happens - but I don't recall anyone saying its definitely about to happen at any point. Think i read somebody speculating that they would start running into serious shortages by the end of may - presumably by looking at their rate of losses and extrapolating. fuck knows. Im saying - with plenty of caveats - that a comprehensive Russian defeat which pushes them back out of Ukraine and leaves Crimea vulnerable is within a range of reasonable possibility - not that is likely. huge of amount of "fuck knows?" all around. I do think its more likely than Russia capturing Odessa or securing anything like a "victory" though.