Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

I'll c&p their key tweets, from briefing:

No one should be fooled by the Kremlin's claim that it will just suddenly reduce military attacks near Kyiv or reports that it will withdraw its forces.
We believe this is a repositioning, not a real withdrawal, and the world should now be prepared for a major offensive against other areas of Ukraine. It does not mean the threat to Kyiv is over.
 
Perhaps you could repost your link supporting this
have read it on various reports - including ISW stuff I think - but nothing to hand - think it was noted that the Russian army aren't doing any night ops cos of lack of night vision stuff - but the Ukrainians are do.ETA - found this in a pre invaions article in the Atlantic

Ukraine Crisis: Deterring Putin is expensive but much cheaper than war

It is also known that the Russian military does not have an abundance of night vision googles, so an ability to see during long winter nights will make Ukrainian troops much more effective and dangerous. Likewise, Russian air superiority will be considerably less useful against an opponent operating in small and highly mobile groups, so secure communication devices should be a priority.
 
have read it on various reports - including ISW stuff I think - but nothing to hand - think it was noted that the Russian army aren't doing any night ops cos of lack of night vision stuff - but the Ukrainians are do.

Yes, very early on. But not confirmed, situations change and tech employed by different branches does different things. I imagine also at this point every hunting shop, bird sanctuary and camera store has had serious looking men clutching requisition orders knocking at the door.
 
There I was thinking you'd left your madder warbling days behind you. I'd ask for any evidence of that, but it'd be like asking a flat earther for evidence for their claims. Bet you'll probably say something to me like 'your cards are marked now you State asset'. Fuck off back to your weird little conspiracy obsessed world you crack smoking fruitbat.
crack smoking fruitbat: I see. No point in engaging with scum like you then. You an asset: hilarious
 
Sorry, to be nerdy, these terms have very specific meanings - air superiority means that when/where you mass your air forces, you can do (broadly) what you need to for X period of time while still incurring some losses. Air supremacy means you have destroyed the enemy's air capability to the point where you can do what you like, where and when you like.
 
Oh my: I have had issues with British spooks for many years, and no sympathy at all with the FSB etc. But if you want to tar me as pro the Russian government, go ahead.

I didn't say you were pro the Russian government, I merely pointed out you were parroting a unsubstantiated rumour that Bellingcat is somehow connected with MI6, which was started by people connected to the Russian government.

I don't know you well enough to know if you are pro the Russian government, or just a useful idiot to them for parroting their propaganda. 🤷‍♂️
 
Wrong about what: Bellingcat? Have you read their own book?

I haven't read it. What's it say?

Yes, what does it say?

I didn't even know they had published a book about themselves, but I am ordering a copy based on some of the reviews I've now read, none seem to suggest a connection with MI6, in fact the opposite is implied, like this from Bill Browder -

"In a world of disrupters, Eliot Higgins and Bellingcat have turned the world of intelligence gathering on its head and put to shame the intelligence services of the biggest and most powerful countries in the world."
 
Yes, what does it say?

I didn't even know they had published a book about themselves, but I am ordering a copy based on some of the reviews I've now read, none seem to suggest a connection with MI6, in fact the opposite is implied, like this from Bill Browder -
Their discord channel is worth joining

 
One thing that continues to puzzle me is this suggestion of Ukraine having a 'secure neutral status but with external security guarantees'.

NATO has been clear they do not want to fight the Russian military, so I am not sure why any NATO countries would offer 'external security guarantees', which seems to be basically asking for NATO protection without actually joining NATO, unless I am missing something.

It came up this morning, when Raab was doing the media rounds -

Raab was cautious about the prospect of the UK acting as an independent guarantor of Ukraine’s security if it declared itself to be neutral as part of a peace deal with Moscow.

“It would depend on what precisely is involved. We have been very clear we are not going to engage Russia in direct military confrontation. Ukraine is not a Nato member,” he said.

“We will consider anything that President Zelenskiy says he needs very carefully. But we are not going to, I think, replicate unilaterally the Nato commitments that apply to Nato members.”
 
One thing that continues to puzzle me is this suggestion of Ukraine having a 'secure neutral status but with external security guarantees'.

NATO has been clear they do not want to fight the Russian military, so I am not sure why any NATO countries would offer 'external security guarantees', which seems to be basically asking for NATO protection without actually joining NATO, unless I am missing something.

It came up this morning, when Raab was doing the media rounds -

Yeah, hard to make much sense of it. It's potentially just a way to push for a withdrawal I suppose, since putting it to a referendum is contingent on that. Also to put pressure on Nato to send more aid. There don't seem to be the votes to carry it either at a constitutional level, or at a population level in any case.
 
One thing that continues to puzzle me is this suggestion of Ukraine having a 'secure neutral status but with external security guarantees'.

NATO has been clear they do not want to fight the Russian military, so I am not sure why any NATO countries would offer 'external security guarantees', which seems to be basically asking for NATO protection without actually joining NATO, unless I am missing something.

It came up this morning, when Raab was doing the media rounds -
Oh, that would be like the guarantees in the Budapest Memorandum. :(
 
Back
Top Bottom