Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

i'm not saying oh noes, i'm saying 'we' should stop selectively hanging on their every word, yesterday they said the CIA was training killer birds and the hospital was full of nazis, they say all kinds of stuff.
:facepalm:

we cannot hang on their every word in the absence of the full text or speech, we can only guess what they mean. and that doesn't advance anything here.
 
The article is entirely accurate in its outlining of how the fairly west-friendly early Putin changed, and the reasons why.

And what brought him to power in the first place.

'The honeymoon with westernisation was short-lived. The shock transition from communism to a market economy, shepherded by a liberal government with western consultants, was a disaster, producing oligarchs, lawlessness and poverty.'
Do you think it might be a good idea to start a separate thread about the long term causes of this war and how hard done by Putin is? I'm not saying the history isn't interesting or relevant, it is, but the same things are being said over and over and over again on this thread about NATO and how awful shock capitalism was for Russia and I don't think it serves much more purpose on this thread.
 
Do you think it might be a good idea to start a separate thread about the long term causes of this war and how hard done by Putin is? I'm not saying the history isn't interesting or relevant, it is, but the same things are being said over and over and over again on this thread about NATO and how awful shock capitalism was for Russia and I don't think it serves much more purpose on this thread.
your purpose on this thread and rd2003's purpose on this thread are two entirely different purposes.
 
Do you think it might be a good idea to start a separate thread about the long term causes of this war and how hard done by Putin is? I'm not saying the history isn't interesting or relevant, it is, but the same things are being said over and over and over again on this thread about NATO and how awful shock capitalism was for Russia and I don't think it serves much more purpose on this thread.
Aren't people examining a variety of subjects over and over in the thread, not least among them the military experts?
 
your purpose on this thread and rd2003's purpose on this thread are two entirely different purposes.

Some different porpoises, earlier.

1.jpg
 
There needs to be some slightly more serious military disaster for the Russian forces, one which Putin understands and accepts the gravity of, before any face-saving retreats and negotiated settlements for Donetsk/Luhansk and Crimea are contemplated. And now that they've basically got a land corridor between Crimea and the East I'd imagine they'd insist on keeping that too. Can't see the current Ukraine government agreeing to it.
 
Bugger Bognor.

Slough by John Betjeman (1906 - 1984)​



Come friendly bombs and fall on Slough!
It isn't fit for humans now,
There isn't grass to graze a cow.
Swarm over, Death!

Come, bombs and blow to smithereens
Those air -conditioned, bright canteens,
Tinned fruit, tinned meat, tinned milk, tinned beans,
Tinned minds, tinned breath.

Mess up the mess they call a town-
A house for ninety-seven down
And once a week a half a crown
For twenty years.

And get that man with double chin
Who'll always cheat and always win,
Who washes his repulsive skin
In women's tears:

And smash his desk of polished oak
And smash his hands so used to stroke
And stop his boring dirty joke
And make him yell.

But spare the bald young clerks who add
The profits of the stinking cad;
It's not their fault that they are mad,
They've tasted Hell.

It's not their fault they do not know
The birdsong from the radio,
It's not their fault they often go
To Maidenhead

And talk of sport and makes of cars
In various bogus-Tudor bars
And daren't look up and see the stars
But belch instead.

In labour-saving homes, with care
Their wives frizz out peroxide hair
And dry it in synthetic air
And paint their nails.

Come, friendly bombs and fall on Slough
To get it ready for the plough.
The cabbages are coming now;
The earth exhales.
 
Very reassuring and innovative contribution by the Ukrainian Ambassador Vadym Prystaiko to the Home Affairs Select Committee about allegations of racism at the Ukrain borders. Many of us non experts wouldn't have thought that segregation was the solution.


“We don’t want it to happen...Problems arise when young foreigners are prioritised over women and children of Ukrainian citizenship who are trying to get on the same trains.

“Maybe we will put all foreigners in some other place so they won’t be visible and there won’t be conflict with Ukrainians trying to flee in the same direction. This is something that has to be taken care of and we will be doing it."
 
Last edited:
The article is entirely accurate in its outlining of how the fairly west-friendly early Putin changed, and the reasons why.

And what brought him to power in the first place.

'The honeymoon with westernisation was short-lived. The shock transition from communism to a market economy, shepherded by a liberal government with western consultants, was a disaster, producing oligarchs, lawlessness and poverty.'

There's no escaping the fact that everything we are seeing today can ultimately be traced back to this.

OH RIGHT so it was only with a market economy that a rich elite, corruption and poverty appeared in Russia :confused::facepalm::rolleyes:
 
Breakfast pizza :thumbs:

He’s saying it loud and clear because the US want everyone to know they are not aggressors in this war.

Stepping on nato soil is obviously a red line. Would something like gas attacks in ukraine be enough to force western involvement? I don’t think any of us know the answer to that. Lets hope the sanctions and ukrainian resistance are enough to make russia turn back.
As true as that is US has supported war by proxy since 2014.
 
Whatever happened to SDI / Star Wars? Shouldn't have spent the 90s and 2000s and 2010s pissing about. Fucking Trump was the one to restart the program. Would sure feel nice knowing that the chances of nuclear bombs actually hitting their targets and exploding was reduced even by 70%.
Star wars was a ruse by Reagan which destroyed the Soviet Union economically it also lead to Russia currently having better anti ballistic missile tech than the US currently do , though nothing is impenetrable That said BAE did do an amazing test a little while ago ...managed to hit a crise missile with a field gun...tech us getting smarter
 
There needs to be some slightly more serious military disaster for the Russian forces, one which Putin understands and accepts the gravity of, before any face-saving retreats and negotiated settlements for Donetsk/Luhansk and Crimea are contemplated. And now that they've basically got a land corridor between Crimea and the East I'd imagine they'd insist on keeping that too. Can't see the current Ukraine government agreeing to it.
Assuming that the Russians do meet a military setback bad enough to make even Putin accept that he has to pull back then what about sanctions? After what he's done is the West really going to say 'OK Vlad you can keep the extra bits of Ukraine that you have grabbed and we will just go back to how things were before?'
I suspect that in that case, sanctions will stay until there is regime change in Russia
 
Assuming that the Russians do meet a military setback bad enough to make even Putin accept that he has to pull back then what about sanctions? After what he's done is the West really going to say 'OK Vlad you can keep the extra bits of Ukraine that you have grabbed and we will just go back to how things were before?'
I suspect that in that case, sanctions will stay until there is regime change in Russia
I think that the best we can hope for is a setback bad enough to give those around Putin a head-wobbling moment, and get some kind of Stauffenberg outcome (only more successful)...
 
I think that the best we can hope for is a setback bad enough to give those around Putin a head-wobbling moment, and get some kind of Stauffenberg outcome (only more successful)...
Does anybody think Kyiv could be that setback? I've thought that as Putin begins to face the reality of losing, Russia will pour it on militarily and threatwise as an all out last ditch effort to turn it around. I think we've seen a change of hands in strategy with Russia broadening the bombings and the movement towards Kyiv. If this gets beaten down people in Russia will start to talk about pulling out...uh, somehow.
 
OH RIGHT so it was only with a market economy that a rich elite, corruption and poverty appeared in Russia :confused::facepalm::rolleyes:
tbf the level of rich elite off the back of privatising state assets and the rich elite of apparatchiks of the old Soviet Union are a very different measure. Where there is concentrated power there is corruption, but the equivalence between the two regimes breaks down pretty quickly when you look at the detail.
There is some direct continuity between the systems though too of course
 
Back
Top Bottom