Is it a good attempt?
It sounds plausible to me but I'm not sure I know enough to say.
Is it a good attempt?
Yeh but apparently only half of them work so it might not be total annihilation, bognor might escapeApparently Russia has over 6000. So even 30% would be a bad news.
That's true if you take the word & threats of Putin as a reliable indicator of how things really are, If Polish planes are handed over that means nato entering the war, cos Putin said so.
But what about these Turkish drone-plane things that drop explosives onto Russian tanks and kill their generals and stuff. They have been so important to the Ukrainian defence that there's even a song about them.
Turkey is in nato and those bayraktar things are definitely offensive weapons so why is that ok but old Polish planes would be different?
If their equipment maintenance issues extend to nukes it might be quite a few lessApparently Russia has over 6000. So even 30% would be a bad news.
And as if by magic…The way I see it there are some 'rules of war' which are followed and ignored at the 'players' will. Both players recognise the rules and recognise when they are being broken.
If Putin wanted to set a new rule of "USA, Do Not Dare Give A Single Weapon To Ukraine Or We Will Bomb US Bases in Poland" or similiar, he could. Nothing to stop him doing so.
Seems clear though that the Kremlin were expecting blowback from this invasion, sanctions and including some proxy warfare/rearming...they prepped for it, and made bold statements about being the cold war generation and used to hardship etc. There's a degree of escalation they can handle and still achieve their goals in this war. Its about riding that line of achieving objectives and not getting nuked themselves
Whatabout when the ruling class happens to be oooh I dunno, palestinian say, or Iranian.Siding with one ruling class against another is what people made politically ignorant by their rulers do.
And as if by magic…
yeh as i say bognor might escape destruction. and maybe abertilleryIf their equipment maintenance issues extend to nukes it might be quite a few less
That's true if you take the word & threats of Putin as a reliable indicator of how things really are, If Polish planes are handed over that means nato entering the war, cos Putin said so.
But what about these Turkish drone-plane things that drop explosives onto Russian tanks and kill their generals and stuff. They have been so important to the Ukrainian defence that there's even a song about them.
Turkey is in nato and those bayraktar things are definitely offensive weapons so why is that ok but old Polish planes would be different?
yeh as i say bognor might escape destruction. and maybe abertillery
As I said, I think it's a mistake to side with any ruling class.Whatabout when the ruling class happens to be oooh I dunno, palestinian say, or Iranian.
i set you up for george v's last words, bugger bognorI'm sure there's a joke in there somewhere...
And as if by magic…
bognor might escape
That's true if you take the word & threats of Putin as a reliable indicator of how things really are, If Polish planes are handed over that means nato entering the war, cos Putin said so.
But what about these Turkish drone-plane things that drop explosives onto Russian tanks and kill their generals and stuff. They have been so important to the Ukrainian defence that there's even a song about them.
Turkey is in nato and those bayraktar things are definitely offensive weapons so why is that ok but old Polish planes would be different?
being as we don't know quite what they've said precisely maybe this isn't the time to say it doesn't make senseIs he seriously saying that from now on they'll see any weapons on their way to Ukraine as legit targets - or only once they're inside Ukraine.
Inside doesn't make any sense, cos obviously the weapons are legit targets once they are in the hands of the Uklrainians.
I think this is a good example of why taking every threatening word literally as a statement of fact doesn't make sense.
Of those 6000-odd in the stockpile only something like 1500 are immediately available. (Similar numbers for the US arsenal).Apparently Russia has over 6000. So even 30% would be a bad news.
yeah. as in, stop arming ukraine or we might start bombing nato countries in the morning. is that to be taken literally ?being as we don't know quite what they've said precisely maybe this isn't the time to say it doesn't make sense
e2a
although from this it looks like convoys heading to ukraine might be considered legitimate targets
View attachment 314052
Russia Ukraine News LIVE Updates: Pope Francis renews calls to end war in Ukraine
www.republicworld.com
I think it might be one for the Why the Guardian is going down the pan thread.Uhhh
sometimes i think your reading comprehension leaves a lot to be desired. we haven't seen all his remarks so we do not know just what russia told the americans: we've only seen two sentences of what was undoubtedly a larger whole, so there is a known unknown, part of which involves whether there were more specific things said about weapons entering ukraine. as we know a lot of the equipment has been arriving via aeroplane were there any things said about that? it's a case of wait and see what emerges and not a time for 'oh noes oh noes'yeah. as in, stop arming ukraine or we might start bombing nato countries in the morning. is that to be taken literally ?
In terms of the war itself I really don't know.That’s exactly what he said, but it’s still a long way from suggesting Russia has free reign in Ukraine. They’ve been pumping in weapons like they’re going out of fashion and most of the world is treating Russia as a pariah state to the extent that its economy is rapidly going down the khazi.
Once again, what more do you (and bimble ) want to be done?
i'm not saying oh noes, i'm saying 'we' should stop selectively hanging on their every word, yesterday they said the CIA was training killer birds and the hospital was full of nazis, they say all kinds of stuff.sometimes i think your reading comprehension leaves a lot to be desired. we haven't seen all his remarks so we do not know just what russia told the americans: we've only seen two sentences of what was undoubtedly a larger whole, so there is a known unknown, part of which involves whether there were more specific things said about weapons entering ukraine. as we know a lot of the equipment has been arriving via aeroplane were there any things said about that? it's a case of wait and see what emerges and not a time for 'oh noes oh noes'
The article is entirely accurate in its outlining of how the fairly west-friendly early Putin changed, and the reasons why.I think it might be one for the Why the Guardian is going down the pan thread.
Yes, but how would you know?Yeh but apparently only half of them work so it might not be total annihilation, bognor might escape
i'm on holiday. But all i was asking is why (for whose ears to what end) does he keep repeating that message about there will be no "direct involvement".
You yourself think it might change & 'the west be forced to act"
If you think it might change why does he keep saying loud & clear that it won't?? What for.
Right. Back to my pizza etc.