Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

Whatever happened to SDI / Star Wars? Shouldn't have spent the 90s and 2000s and 2010s pissing about. Fucking Trump was the one to restart the program. Would sure feel nice knowing that the chances of nuclear bombs actually hitting their targets and exploding was reduced even by 70%.

Apparently Russia has over 6000. So even 30% would be a bad news.
 
That's true if you take the word & threats of Putin as a reliable indicator of how things really are, If Polish planes are handed over that means nato entering the war, cos Putin said so.

But what about these Turkish drone-plane things that drop explosives onto Russian tanks and kill their generals and stuff. They have been so important to the Ukrainian defence that there's even a song about them.

Turkey is in nato and those bayraktar things are definitely offensive weapons so why is that ok but old Polish planes would be different?

The way I see it there are some 'rules of war' which are followed and ignored at the 'players' will. Both players recognise the rules and recognise when they are being broken.

If Putin wanted to set a new rule of "USA, Do Not Dare Give A Single Weapon To Ukraine Or We Will Bomb US Bases in Poland" or similiar, he could. Nothing to stop him doing so.

Seems clear though that the Kremlin were expecting blowback from this invasion, sanctions and including some proxy warfare/rearming...they prepped for it, and made bold statements about being the cold war generation and used to hardship etc. There's a degree of escalation they can handle and still achieve their goals in this war. Its about riding that line of achieving objectives and not getting nuked themselves
 
The way I see it there are some 'rules of war' which are followed and ignored at the 'players' will. Both players recognise the rules and recognise when they are being broken.

If Putin wanted to set a new rule of "USA, Do Not Dare Give A Single Weapon To Ukraine Or We Will Bomb US Bases in Poland" or similiar, he could. Nothing to stop him doing so.

Seems clear though that the Kremlin were expecting blowback from this invasion, sanctions and including some proxy warfare/rearming...they prepped for it, and made bold statements about being the cold war generation and used to hardship etc. There's a degree of escalation they can handle and still achieve their goals in this war. Its about riding that line of achieving objectives and not getting nuked themselves
And as if by magic…

 
I hadn't realised the vaccination rate in Ukraine was so low, looks like the misery for civilians will be compounded by severe outbreaks and COVID deaths - I hope the virus rips through Russian forces as well.

Ukraine has a relatively low Covid vaccination rate, barely one-third of the population, and millions of people fleeing their homes have crowded into evacuation trains, resettlement centers, temporary housing and underground shelters — conditions ripe for a new surge of infections.

Recently, Ukraine has also been grappling with a rare outbreak of polio, which spreads through the kind of unsanitary conditions and water contamination that are common in a refugee crisis.


 
That's true if you take the word & threats of Putin as a reliable indicator of how things really are, If Polish planes are handed over that means nato entering the war, cos Putin said so.

But what about these Turkish drone-plane things that drop explosives onto Russian tanks and kill their generals and stuff. They have been so important to the Ukrainian defence that there's even a song about them.

Turkey is in nato and those bayraktar things are definitely offensive weapons so why is that ok but old Polish planes would be different?

I believe flying planes into a warzone would be taken as participating by anyone. You are now a danger to the aircraft and ground forces of the Russians. And like others have said, on the point of making a no-fly zone, it's not as easy as just having planes in the air. Notice the American method is to first reduce the air defenses down to AK rifles before you have air superiority. That would mean eliminating the Russian anti-air defenses - air to ground. We're fooling ourselves if we think we can operate by some fantasy and fragile rules of warfare. War is war. And then there's the fact that you have to coordinate your operations with the Ukrainians so you don't get shot down.

The drones from Turkey are being purchased, as I've read. Turkey have stated that they are not aid. But besides that, I agree with you. I think it's funny watching people split hairs on what's an offensive weapon and what's not.
 
And as if by magic…


Is he seriously saying that from now on they'll see any weapons on their way to Ukraine as legit targets - or only once they're inside Ukraine.
Inside doesn't make any sense, cos obviously the weapons are legit targets once they are in the hands of the Uklrainians.
I think this is a good example of why taking every threatening word literally as a statement of fact doesn't make sense.
 
That's true if you take the word & threats of Putin as a reliable indicator of how things really are, If Polish planes are handed over that means nato entering the war, cos Putin said so.

But what about these Turkish drone-plane things that drop explosives onto Russian tanks and kill their generals and stuff. They have been so important to the Ukrainian defence that there's even a song about them.

Turkey is in nato and those bayraktar things are definitely offensive weapons so why is that ok but old Polish planes would be different?

I think there's a difference between supplying countries with weapons and actually engaging your forces in a war on behalf of another country. The entire arms industry is built on this premise. If supplying weapons to an army constitutes a declaration of war I probably wouldn't have made it past my 2nd birthday given the history of that sort of thing in the cold war.
 
Is he seriously saying that from now on they'll see any weapons on their way to Ukraine as legit targets - or only once they're inside Ukraine.
Inside doesn't make any sense, cos obviously the weapons are legit targets once they are in the hands of the Uklrainians.
I think this is a good example of why taking every threatening word literally as a statement of fact doesn't make sense.
being as we don't know quite what they've said precisely maybe this isn't the time to say it doesn't make sense

e2a
although from this it looks like convoys heading to ukraine might be considered legitimate targets
1647084222841.png
 
being as we don't know quite what they've said precisely maybe this isn't the time to say it doesn't make sense

e2a
although from this it looks like convoys heading to ukraine might be considered legitimate targets
View attachment 314052
yeah. as in, stop arming ukraine or we might start bombing nato countries in the morning. is that to be taken literally ?
 
yeah. as in, stop arming ukraine or we might start bombing nato countries in the morning. is that to be taken literally ?
sometimes i think your reading comprehension leaves a lot to be desired. we haven't seen all his remarks so we do not know just what russia told the americans: we've only seen two sentences of what was undoubtedly a larger whole, so there is a known unknown, part of which involves whether there were more specific things said about weapons entering ukraine. as we know a lot of the equipment has been arriving via aeroplane were there any things said about that? it's a case of wait and see what emerges and not a time for 'oh noes oh noes'
 
That’s exactly what he said, but it’s still a long way from suggesting Russia has free reign in Ukraine. They’ve been pumping in weapons like they’re going out of fashion and most of the world is treating Russia as a pariah state to the extent that its economy is rapidly going down the khazi.

Once again, what more do you (and bimble ) want to be done?
In terms of the war itself I really don't know.

But somethings that they could be doing.

1 - shipping food and medical supplies to Ukraine instead of just weapons.

2 - proactive take refugees form Ukraine, organising transport form the border instead of leaving people to spend days making there own way then leave the stuck for not having signed some form along the way.

3 - This one is mainly Germany, but stop buying Russian Gas and oil and raise takes on the companies that are making record profits out this instead of passing the cost on to the consumers.

4 - Instead of making it harder for people to flee Russia make it easier.

5- If the Russian economy tanks so bad food becomes a problem offer to send food their as well.
 
sometimes i think your reading comprehension leaves a lot to be desired. we haven't seen all his remarks so we do not know just what russia told the americans: we've only seen two sentences of what was undoubtedly a larger whole, so there is a known unknown, part of which involves whether there were more specific things said about weapons entering ukraine. as we know a lot of the equipment has been arriving via aeroplane were there any things said about that? it's a case of wait and see what emerges and not a time for 'oh noes oh noes'
i'm not saying oh noes, i'm saying 'we' should stop selectively hanging on their every word, yesterday they said the CIA was training killer birds and the hospital was full of nazis, they say all kinds of stuff.
 
I think it might be one for the Why the Guardian is going down the pan thread.
The article is entirely accurate in its outlining of how the fairly west-friendly early Putin changed, and the reasons why.

And what brought him to power in the first place.

'The honeymoon with westernisation was short-lived. The shock transition from communism to a market economy, shepherded by a liberal government with western consultants, was a disaster, producing oligarchs, lawlessness and poverty.'

There's no escaping the fact that everything we are seeing today can ultimately be traced back to this.
 
i'm on holiday. But all i was asking is why (for whose ears to what end) does he keep repeating that message about there will be no "direct involvement".

You yourself think it might change & 'the west be forced to act"


If you think it might change why does he keep saying loud & clear that it won't?? What for.
Right. Back to my pizza etc.

If there's any hint of sabre-rattling Putin is going nowhere because he can't be seen to withdraw because he was scared of conflict wth NATO. My guess is Biden is reiterating this to open up the space for the kind of face saving retreat that some even in Russia seem to be calling for - as in Putin declares victory and pulls the forces back to the occupied territories in the East and comes to some kind of negotiated settlement.
 
Back
Top Bottom