Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

yeh i don't know why they have these things as they so often seemed a trick in syria and they're playing the same game now in ukraine.
how long will people in ukraine fall for it? not much longer i expect
well its a rock and a hard place - desperate people need to get out before they die - threats of illness, cold and food are as real as rockets...by playing this game it would I expect it hurts the morale of Ukrainian state officials and makes them more pliable to reaching a ceasefire sooner
 
well its a rock and a hard place - desperate people need to get out before they die - threats of illness, cold and food are as real as rockets...by playing this game it would I expect it hurts the morale of Ukrainian state officials and makes them more pliable to reaching a ceasefire sooner
yeh the choice is between a lingering death from disease, starvation or hypothermia on the one had and being blown up or shot down on the other. not great options
 
I'd be cautious of reading too much into their position... Yesterday Wang Yi emphasised the importance of China-Russia relationships and talked up how together they resist the revival of cold war thinking and ideological confrontation, how their relationship is 'rock solid'... But they're also seemingly trying to reform US relations. Their NPC and CPPCC sessions are in progress at the moment, so there is a lot of talk, and a lot of propaganda going about. It is not easy to get any firm read on what's going on there... I personally don't really have the energy to dig into it, maybe one of the more experienced China people on here will. It might be worth a separate thread.

I'll add that the CCP must have some kind of read as to what's going on (though if Putin teaches us anything, it's that there's a huge risk of internalising your own propaganda). How that plays out... Difficult to say. Just that I doubt that relationship is anywhere near as solid as Wang Yi is saying. I suspect it will be more a case of China needing to keep its energy secure, perhaps with potential economic and media expansion into Russia (though maybe that seems a bit of a poisoned chalice).
China Daily (state-owned newspaper) toes the party line and is a reliable indicator for the official stance on any given issue. (Although you won't necessarily get any insight into disputes or backroom negotiations.)
 
I just dont understand what information we are supposed to have that can provide confidence that even if the Russian plans have been full of mistakes and failures, that they cannot still take Kyiv within weeks. If they fail to take it within 2 weeks of the start of the invasion, have we actually been provided with detailed analysis that we can use to presume they cannot take it after 3 weeks or 4 weeks or a bit longer?

I dont even know what strength of force Ukraine has positioned to defend Kyiv. I dont know if they have the ability to get even a single plane up in the air at the moment, but then I'm not exactly spending multiple hours a day searching for that information. It seems like a good while since we heard about any Ukrainian planes taking on the Russians, but again I may have missed news on that front. Does anyone have any recent examples that would help fill that void?

I'm certainly not ruling out the possibility that things could drag on for a very long time, but there are a lot of possibilities somewhere in between. And I cannot bring myself to lurch from the idea that they would take Kyiv in a few days to concluding that they cannot possibly take it in weeks. Even when I factor in numerous failings and setbacks on the part of Russia, analysts seem to have left plenty of wiggle room for major Russian gains in the weeks to come. I appreciate what narratives are popular here and elsewhere at the moment, and I would like to entertain such possibilities, but its still too soon for me to do so. And since my opinions are of no relevance to things like morale on the Ukrainian side, I dont have to.

Fair enough, we don't know for certain that they can't take it within weeks. I think it is fair to say that things haven't been going well though, in terms of casualties, places being recaptured by Ukrainians, the international response, senior Officers getting killed, that long convoy getting bogged down.

What I am basing this on is the resilience of Mariupol, a city of 450,000, when it is located between Crimea and the Donbas where the Russians are strongest and have had fewer logistical problems.

It appears that the Russians are having trouble moving troops in large enough numbers to approach Kyiv, and supposedly, a successful siege of a city requires between 5x and 10x as many attackers as defenders. Kyiv is a city of 3 million and in addition to the regular military there are lots of irregular militias and volunteers. They have now held out long enough to receive additional supplies from Europe, so are going to be quite well equipped.

Also, nearby cities Sumy and Kharkiv have avoided being besieged for quite a long time now, and these are smaller cities than Kyiv. Kyiv is 9x larger than Sumy and 3x larger than Kharkiv. I think it is unlikely that Russia will be in a position to besiege Kyiv until it has secured Kharkiv and Sumy at least, but so far they have not even managed to encircle them, so I feel we are a long way from them encircling Kyiv. It could happen, but I think if it does, we will be measuring the time in months, rather than weeks.

The Ukrainian airforce appears to still be intact -


But I concede this could be propaganda. Perhaps they are saving them for when they have Russian targets which lack AA defense.

But I'm not claiming any expertise here, just trying to get a read on the situation based on the information which is available to me. Based on what is to hand, it looks like Russia has a gruelling campaign ahead of it. I could be proved wrong though.
 
There is a massive opportunity here for China both in terms of raising their diplomatic success if they could broker a deal and so further edging the US from their 'number one international power broker' slot as well as picking up lots of Russian assets and debt at fire sale prices if western sanctions continue to bite.

(i'm not saying I thing this is a good thing TBF, just a thing.)
China could also get burned financially, due to Russian currency/ economy collapse. They share a common border, 4k+ km, sixth longest border in the world. They do a lot of business. There's quite a large Russian community in Beijing.

So, while, yes, some Chinese might welcome the business opportunities presented by disaster capitalism, a lot of Chinese companies are going to see their invoices go unpaid and their Russian customers go under, they're going to take a big financial hit.
 
Fair enough, we don't know for certain that they can't take it within weeks. I think it is fair to say that things haven't been going well though, in terms of casualties, places being recaptured by Ukrainians, the international response, senior Officers getting killed, that long convoy getting bogged down.

What I am basing this on is the resilience of Mariupol, a city of 450,000, when it is located between Crimea and the Donbas where the Russians are strongest and have had fewer logistical problems.

It appears that the Russians are having trouble moving troops in large enough numbers to approach Kyiv, and supposedly, a successful siege of a city requires between 5x and 10x as many attackers as defenders. Kyiv is a city of 3 million and in addition to the regular military there are lots of irregular militias and volunteers. They have now held out long enough to receive additional supplies from Europe, so are going to be quite well equipped.

Also, nearby cities Sumy and Kharkiv have avoided being besieged for quite a long time now, and these are smaller cities than Kyiv. Kyiv is 9x larger than Sumy and 3x larger than Kharkiv. I think it is unlikely that Russia will be in a position to besiege Kyiv until it has secured Kharkiv and Sumy at least, but so far they have not even managed to encircle them, so I feel we are a long way from them encircling Kyiv. It could happen, but I think if it does, we will be measuring the time in months, rather than weeks.

The Ukrainian airforce appears to still be intact -


But I concede this could be propaganda. Perhaps they are saving them for when they have Russian targets which lack AA defense.

But I'm not claiming any expertise here, just trying to get a read on the situation based on the information which is available to me. Based on what is to hand, it looks like Russia has a gruelling campaign ahead of it. I could be proved wrong though.

TBF big cities are generally harder to defend than small cities are.
 
Isn't Putin seen as the leading global enemy of liberal globalists tho, a Christian Nationalist who is anti LGBTQ rights etc?
Indeed he is. Plenty of prominent far right evangelicals/christian natioalists in the Republican party have openly praised Putin for clamping down on the LGBT+ community, being anti-woke and enforcing 'christian values'/'supporting the state church.'
 
China could also get burned financially, due to Russian currency/ economy collapse. They share a common border, 4k+ km, sixth longest border in the world. They do a lot of business. There's quite a large Russian community in Beijing.

So, while, yes, some Chinese might welcome the business opportunities presented by disaster capitalism, a lot of Chinese companies are going to see their invoices go unpaid and their Russian customers go under, they're going to take a big financial hit.

I also wouldn't be surprised if Kazakhstan et al become a back door to supplying Russia with all the sanctioned goods it requires in the near future.
 
Petition on the government website, it's over 100k already, I've just signed to show a bit of solidarity.


Update on the website...

Parliament will debate this petition​

Parliament will debate this petition on 14 March 2022.

You'll be able to watch online on the UK Parliament YouTube channel.
 
FWIW. Not that I disagree with the sentiment but these petitions even when debated pretty much never work.

00002.jpg
 
This is a bleak piece but has a great line in it.

111823F4-68A9-414C-988B-4016E12CDC14.jpeg

Even if he and others really did think that Ukrainians were just Russians who strayed by mistake, the anger and hatred created this past 11 days will probably last generations now.

 
This presentation to Parliament - what does Zelenskyy hope to achieve? He must know the no fly zone is completely out of the question no matter how many times they ask.
My completely uneducated guess is that it was a Downing Street demand in exchange for whatever intelligence and supplies Britain is supplying. It's purely to make Bohnson look important and historic.
 
This is a bleak piece but has a great line in it.

View attachment 313444

Even if he and others really did think that Ukrainians were just Russians who strayed by mistake, the anger and hatred created this past 11 days will probably last generations now.



If Ukraine wasn’t a nation before Putin is doing very well at making it one
 
Micronesia's in the shit.


Russia issues list of ‘unfriendly’ countries amid Ukraine crisis​


According to a government statement, the list includes Albania, Andorra, Australia, Great Britain, including Jersey, Anguilla, British Virgin Islands, Gibraltar, European Union member states, Iceland, Canada, Liechtenstein, Micronesia, Monaco, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, San Marino, North Macedonia, Singapore, United States, Taiwan, Ukraine, Montenegro, Switzerland and Japan.
 
My completely uneducated guess is that it was a Downing Street demand in exchange for whatever intelligence and supplies Britain is supplying. It's purely to make Bohnson look important and historic.

Zelenskyy asked to be able to address the chamber, he's already done it in several other countries, and of course, the UN too.
 
I'm not saying that this isn't the case, but I am saying that I'll believe it when someone who isn't Oz Katerji says it. He tweeted this recently


well, other people have said the same. I believe its to do with how UK was very quick in sending weapons, instead of wasting time pointlessly conversing with Putin like Macron did.
 
Biden has actually tweeted, "We are banning all imports of Russian oil and gas."

That feels like quite a big deal. Don't know how big a market the US was for Russia but even so.
 
Back
Top Bottom