Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
this supposes the moscow regime to be communistNot really, I'm opposed to this war. If you want Russia to win or keep it's gains from the war because it's up against the west then you're a tankie.
this supposes the moscow regime to be communistNot really, I'm opposed to this war. If you want Russia to win or keep it's gains from the war because it's up against the west then you're a tankie.
In April 1978 there was a military coup in Kabul. Army officers who were members of the Peoples Democratic Party of Afghanistan, (a Communist Party) removed the President. The USSR intervened in December 1979, and removed the PDPA President and replaced him with another member of the PDPA.i mist have missed the soviet intervention to remove the communist government in kabul. can you tell me more about it?
that doesn't sound to me like 'removing the communist government in kabul'.In April 1978 there was a military coup in Kabul. Army officers who were members of the Peoples Democratic Party of Afghanistan, (a Communist Party) removed the President. The USSR intervened in December 1979, and removed the PDPA President and replaced him with another member of the PDPA.
Does it not? It is not that different from what happened in Czechoslovakia, but with more blood shed.that doesn't sound to me like 'removing the communist government in kabul'.
How do the Nepalese units in the British Army cope, I wonder?
That's the origin of the term, but common usage today is leftists who uncritically support any force perceived as anti-Western and downplay/deny/defend human rights abuses to that end.What is a Tankie? It was someone who supported the Soviet military invasion of Czechoslavakia in 1968, to remove the Communist government of that country. It was then applied to those supported the Soviet military intervention in Afghanistan to remove the Communist government of that country. In both cases, the national sovereignty of another country was violated
perhaps you should edit the wiki page to reflect your idiosyncratic take of the term Tankie - WikipediaThat's the origin of the term, but common usage today is leftists who uncritically support any force perceived as anti-Western and downplay/deny/defend human rights abuses to that end.
Salivating over North Korea invading South Korea is pretty much as Tankie as it is possible to go.
"Common usage?" Pehaps amongst you and your friends.That's the origin of the term, but common usage today is leftists who uncritically support any force perceived as anti-Western and downplay/deny/defend human rights abuses to that end.
Salivating over North Korea invading South Korea is pretty much as Tankie as it is possible to go.
that doesn't sound to me like 'removing the communist government in kabul'.
Most governments are composed of more than one personHafizullah Amin was a brutal and unpopular Stalinist. He had a photo of Stalin on his desk, so I think it's fair to use that term. The USSR organised his assassination because rhey feared rhat the regime was unstable. They tried to poison him twice. The first time he was revived by Soviet doctors who weren't on on the plot. The second time the carbonated Coca-Cola he was drinking helped dissipate the effects of the poison
40 Years After His Death, Hafizullah Amin Casts a Long Shadow in Afghanistan
40 years ago, the Soviet Union eliminated a communist rival from power in Afghanistan. Ever since, the country has prodded through a history of violence and political uncertainty.thediplomat.com
Here is the Soviet explanation as to why his elimination was necessary.
Politbiuro Report on Afghanistan
Report on Events in Afghanistan on 27-28 December 1979. December 31, 1979 On December 12, 1979, the Soviet Politburo met and voted to intervene in the struggle for power in Afghanistan. On D…soviethistory.msu.edu
How do we know he had photograph of Stalin on his desk?Hafizullah Amin was a brutal and unpopular Stalinist. He had a photo of Stalin on his desk, so I think it's fair to use that term. The USSR organised his assassination because rhey feared rhat the regime was unstable. They tried to poison him twice. The first time he was revived by Soviet doctors who weren't on on the plot. The second time the carbonated Coca-Cola he was drinking helped dissipate the effects of the poison
40 Years After His Death, Hafizullah Amin Casts a Long Shadow in Afghanistan
40 years ago, the Soviet Union eliminated a communist rival from power in Afghanistan. Ever since, the country has prodded through a history of violence and political uncertainty.thediplomat.com
Here is the Soviet explanation as to why his elimination was necessary.
Politbiuro Report on Afghanistan
Report on Events in Afghanistan on 27-28 December 1979. December 31, 1979 On December 12, 1979, the Soviet Politburo met and voted to intervene in the struggle for power in Afghanistan. On D…soviethistory.msu.edu
I don't see anything in the article that says his usage is wrong.perhaps you should edit the wiki page to reflect your idiosyncratic take of the term Tankie - Wikipedia
I read it about half an hour ago.How do we know he had photograph of Stalin on his desk?
Most governments are composed of more than one person
I read it about half an hour ago.
I thought so.I read it about half an hour ago.
You didn't read it did you?perhaps you should edit the wiki page to reflect your idiosyncratic take of the term Tankie - Wikipedia
In recent times, the term has been used across the political spectrum and in a geopolitical context to describe those who have a bias in favour of anti-Western states, authoritarian states or states with a socialist legacy, such as Belarus, Cuba, China,[9] Syria,[10] North Korea, Russia and Venezuela. Additionally, the term pejoratively describes left-wing political activists who are allegedly favourable towards non-socialist authoritarian states that oppose the U.S., such as Iran.[citation needed]
I thought so.
It may be true. It is one of those little details that some writers like to add to add.
If you think that there was nothing wrong with the USSR intervening to overthrow a communist government, then I suppose that makes you a tankie.
i did read it and that doesn't really support your 'common usage today' claim, does it.You didn't read it did you?
You didn't read it did you?
I’m wondering what the catch all term for people is who, despite blathering of personal and political morality, support the projection of US power both political and military?
Americans.I’m wondering what the catch all term for people is who, despite blatherings of personal and political morality, support the projection of US power both political and military?
Can't see any difference tbh.i did read it and that doesn't really support your 'common usage today' claim, does it.
Time for a trip to specsavers.Can't see any difference tbh.
Hopefully that yugoslav poster won't take up your invitation otherwise I can see a 60 page debate.I don't see anything in the article that says his usage is wrong.
However, said article appears to have a good dozen definitions of what "tankie" means, so I'm going to assume it's one of those pejorative words that means whatever the fuck the user wants it to. We may as well turn it into a 6 page debate, because there's bugger all else that's different from yesterday going on in Ukraine right now.
I said:Time for a trip to specsavers.
common usage today is leftists who uncritically support any force perceived as anti-Western and downplay/deny/defend human rights abuses to that end.
Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support acts of repression by such regimes or their allies.
...
In recent times, the term has been used across the political spectrum and in a geopolitical context to describe those who have a bias in favour of anti-Western states, authoritarian states or states with a socialist legacy, such as Belarus, Cuba, China,[9] Syria,[10] North Korea, Russia and Venezuela.
has been used and common usage are two rather different things. i have used knives to open lids of golden syrup tins, but i don't suppose that's the common usage of knives. you made out that the dominant (common) use today was for a) leftists b) unconditionally supporting anti-western actions. it's not plain yours is the common usage, as you declared it to beI said:
Wiki said:
What exactly is this huge difference here?