nogojones
spelling is overrated
His spirit lives
Oh that is disappointing from the IRSP
His spirit lives
Very much soOh that is disappointing from the IRSP
Any idea if that's on Netflix?
Looks like the Kharkiv ground assault, such as it was, has probably now failed.
I am wondering to what extent russian forces are not complying in a way that won't cost them jail time. Letting your tank run out of petrol or firing ordinance into Kyiev city dump might be indications.
Posted in error on ather thread Pickman's model
Ah bloody hell, sorry, I'll bin it.Your URL not durable
You're against concrete statements but you say, "Putin did not just expect to walk in and them roll over". Well, how would you know? And it's not as if kebabking or others here are all alone in their ideas. Experts across the world have said the same things. This is really no time for urban thought police. This thread has been sensible on the whole. And understand that in a conflict there's more that just factual information and propaganda. There are also things thought to be true as reported from the battlefield that eventually turn out to be wrong. That's just the way it is. No fault on anybody posting it on here.This is the trouble with 24/7 rolling Urban. Concrete statements being made on the basis of one day's fighting and (understandable) optimistic propaganda. 3-4 days in and we're discussing hoped for military coups (yeah, right) and Putin giving up. This is the Russian army, one of the biggest in the world (even if they have lost 4,000 troops, which they probably haven't, that's 0.4% of their total). And the terrain is not Afghanistan. All the analysis I've read from the last 3-4 years talking about this predicted Ukraine would be difficult to take. Putin did not just expect to walk in and them roll over (I'm surprised you suggested this might be true kebabking ). He's certainly not about to retreat. The Russians are advancing. Three second attention spans and a desire for everything to be sorted in days, not months or years, is not what is required here.
This is the trouble with 24/7 rolling Urban. Concrete statements being made on the basis of one day's fighting and (understandable) optimistic propaganda. 3-4 days in and we're discussing hoped for military coups (yeah, right) and Putin giving up. This is the Russian army, one of the biggest in the world (even if they have lost 4,000 troops, which they probably haven't, that's 0.4% of their total). And the terrain is not Afghanistan. All the analysis I've read from the last 3-4 years talking about this predicted Ukraine would be difficult to take. Putin did not just expect to walk in and them roll over (I'm surprised you suggested this might be true kebabking ). He's certainly not about to retreat. The Russians are advancing. Three second attention spans and a desire for everything to be sorted in days, not months or years, is not what is required here.
Interesting overview from retired US Joint Chief:
How would Putin finance an extended war in Ukraine though?
With great difficultyHow would Putin finance an extended war in Ukraine though?
Why not summarise the 24 tweet thread so people know whether to read it in this fast moving situation?
But equally this would I suppose prevent NATO ships from non-black sea countries from passing the bosphorus
I know because I've read it. My point is people who post up something like that should indicate why it is 'interesting' - and your post doesn't capture his observations on the whys of Russia's manoeuvrings and his analysis of why Ukraine are doing better than Russia anticipated, which are imo more useful than you suggest. Simply put people should explain why videos are worth watching or Twitter threads add to understanding just like it says in the faq.Well it's from a US military brass who served in the last 20 years so definitely someone with an inside track on how to fail miserably despite an overwhelming resource advantage.
This is one of the reasons we need a forum so people looking for ways to help can find stuff like this on a dedicated thread rather than lost on other discussionsPosted here for wider exposure , Lewisham Polish Centre is collecting clothing for refugees entering Poland from Ukraine.
Lewisham Polish Centre
8, WALDRAM PARK ROAD
SE23 2PN London - Forest Hill
Greater London England
Phone:
020 8699 0401
Dear Facebook friends.
Lewisham Polish Centre is organising the collection of necessary products for refugees from Ukraine in Poland. I will be taking things there on Tuesday after work so if you would like to help, you can bring any items to my house by Tuesday morning or go directly there Lewisham Polish Centre 8 Waldram Park Rd, London SE23 2PN.
Thank you
Current collection days and times
Sunday 27th February 1-6pm
Monday 9:30am-12noon and 6pm-8pm
Tuesday 5:30-8pm
what is needed:
Thermal blankets,
sleeping bags,
bedding,
mats,
military mattresses
blankets
Raincoats
Pillows
Personal hygiene products
Toothpaste,
toothbrush
Wet wipes
Pampers and sanitary napkins
Paper towels
Antibacterial fluids,
medical spirit
Disposable and reusable masks
Dressings,
liquid for disinfecting and disinfecting wounds
Bandages of dressings Celox (i.e. granules for quick staunching blood and gauze) Turnstiles, or tourniquets to stop blood.
Field tents
Camp beds
Coal furnaces
Cooking cauldrons
Microfiber towels Reusable tableware sets, i.e. plates and cutlery
Batteries of various sizes,
candles,
flashlights.
From food: All kinds of instant food (i.e. instant soups to be poured with boiling water, etc.)
Breakfast cereals
Energy bars
Dried fruits
Pasta
Instant groats If you can bring to our center items from the above list, tomorrow on Sunday, February 27 from 13. Please do not leave your belongings at the center. It will also be possible to do it in the next week.
What do we need:
- packaging cartons
Thank you
Hadn't struck me before but a good description is also useful if you do watch it and then want to find it again some time afterwards.I know because I've read it. My point is people who post up something like that should indicate why it is 'interesting' - and your post doesn't capture his observations on the whys of Russia's manoeuvrings and his analysis of why Ukraine are doing better than Russia anticipated, which are imo more useful than you suggest. Simply put people should explain why videos are worth watching or Twitter threads add to understanding just like it says in the faq.
Very good point, hadn't thought of thatHadn't struck me before but a good description is also useful if you do watch it and then want to find it again some time afterwards.
I know because I've read it. My point is people who post up something like that should indicate why it is 'interesting' - and your post doesn't capture his observations on the whys of Russia's manoeuvrings and his analysis of why Ukraine are doing better than Russia anticipated, which are imo more useful than you suggest. Simply put people should explain why videos are worth watching or Twitter threads add to understanding just like it says in the faq.
You're against concrete statements but you say, "Putin did not just expect to walk in and them roll over". Well, how would you know?
That's not a summary of what he says, is it. I thought lawyers were skilled in the understanding and use of English but I see I was much mistaken in your case at leastIt is interesting because it is the view of a retired US joint chief. It’s all there if you want to see it.
How would Putin finance an extended war in Ukraine though?