Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Food Shortages

What I mean is that we have far far far too much in the way of choice, ten of this, twenty of that. It isn't necessary.

However, as I regard food as fuel, rather than a gourmet dining experience, I appreciate that others may disagree.
I'm telling your missus that you've dissed her cooking! :eek:
 
There have been big supply chain problems in the bike industry for months. It's not just HGV drivers or Brexit causing it but they're certainly adding to it. For example, I saw one of our supplier reps last week and he said that the line of budget saddles that we get from them was about to run out for the foreseeable future because the factory in Vietnam that makes them has had to shut down operations because of local Covid restrictions. When I go to order stuff it's a constant game of finding something in stock. Lots of things that we rely on as a repair business (the metalwork mostly - chains, cassettes, derailleurs, brakes etc) are showing as out of stock for months. Some things have an ETA date on supplier websites of mid to late 2022.
A friend has been waiting to take delivery of a cargo bike from a German "boutique" manufacturer for about 5 months now. They claim it's because their usual carrier has raised prices, meaning they're reliant on the Hermes-types. If they're that worried, they should fed-ex the fucking thing. They're charging her £4,000 for the damn thing, as it is!!! :eek:
 
Tesco’s £1.4 Billion profit in 6 months. According to one source a few years ago they had 209,000 low paid staff claiming Income Support and Housing Benefit.It was estimated that each store’s wage bill is subsided by the tax payer to the tune of £139k a year.
 
Tesco’s £1.4 Billion profit in 6 months. According to one source a few years ago they had 209,000 low paid staff claiming Income Support and Housing Benefit.It was estimated that each store’s wage bill is subsided by the tax payer to the tune of £139k a year.
Why is that even allowed? Why isn't there even a decent minimum pay before anyone gets anything more, let alone a dividend? It should be unthinkable for Income Support to make up for crap wages. In effect, income support is putting money into the bosses' pockets.

Eh, you lot know all this already, obvs, I just wanted to rant.
 
Most large companies could afford to take a hit in their profits, but they're all so used to high executive pay, & 2-figure dividends for shareholders, that it doesn't even occur to them to suck it up themselves.
Large companies could if the could be arsed :mad: but I don't see how small companies, the self-employed with a few workers or the public sector can. :(
 
Large companies could if the could be arsed :mad: but I don't see how small companies, the self-employed with a few workers or the public sector can. :(
We should start by making sure the big companies stop fucking us over and start paying all their taxes. As well as paying proper wages.

Of course neither of these things will happen, especially not with fucking Johnson and the Tories
 
Got a Tesco delivery today am in a Leicestershire marina and the car is now in Yorkshire - that’s where we are headed. I went into the nearest town yesterday but didn’t want to haul tons of groceries home by bus. The Sainsbury’s there seemed fully stocked. So the delivery came and I got no soya milk or bog roll so I guess I’m back on the bus tomorrow then 😩
 
A bit of realism in the Guardian. The article is thoughtful, the comments less so but also enlightening. Johnson will survive these crises because he can turn them into a story about Britain | John Harris
The age-old far right playbook of harnessing and exploiting the affective domain of resentment and alienation to trump any objective evidence.

Was reading David Edgar's LRB review of Mike Maikin-Waite's "On Burnley road" the other day; on the initial rise and success of the BNP Maikin-Waite wrote:
They were told that the party founded in their name, and which had run the town as long as anyone could remember, was favouring ‘certain others’ over and above them. A new political identity was constructed, processing people’s sullen sense of being badly done by, but also enabling them to feel assertive and proud. Long-established social bonds had been dissolved, threatening people’s sense of identity and purpose. In such circumstances, the idea that there is a national collective to which you belong helps to meet strong emotional and affective needs.
 
The age-old far right playbook of harnessing and exploiting the affective domain of resentment and alienation to trump any objective evidence.
Well it’s objective evidence that post 2003 immigration to the UK has limited wage inflation and limited investment. But hey profits are maintained.
 
Well it’s objective evidence that post 2003 immigration to the UK has limited wage inflation and limited investment. But hey profits are maintained.
Can't say that there's convincing objective evidence that immigration from the accession states had any discernible impact on investment. The long-term, secular logic of financialised capital to pursue a low wages/lower UK capital investment strategy has been evident as far back as the 'Oil Crisis'. Obviously the 'credit crunch' dented capital investment markedly, but the low investment regime has persisted quite consistently since late Thatcher:

1633940057072.png
 
Similarly, although there is ab 'economic logic' that immigration will keep the costs of labour low, the objective evidence of UK real wage doesn't really support the idea that the accession immigration limited wage growth as much as all the other neoliberal, supply-side 'flexibility' introduced by all of the tory governments since 1976:

1633940655623.png
 
The age-old far right playbook of harnessing and exploiting the affective domain of resentment and alienation to trump any objective evidence.

Was reading David Edgar's LRB review of Mike Maikin-Waite's "On Burnley road" the other day; on the initial rise and success of the BNP Maikin-Waite wrote:
I went to a talk by Mike when he’d just completed his initial research about the BNP victory and decline in Burnley . Then ; one of his main points was the successful ( and very selective) marketing by the BNP of the economic decline of Burnley especially traditional jobs , the impact of that and migration on community etc . This was coupled with some community activism , an economic programme which in some aspects was to the left of the Blairite Labour Party and a scathing anti Tory critique. His conclusion was that it was successful precisely because there was more than a grain of truth in it , that none of the local parties had a post industrial critique or plan ie business ( what was left of it ) as usual . An area , of which large parts of it might have been the assumed terrain of the left , succumbed to a poisonous far right ( not Conservative ) agenda with left having no answer, unable to promote any other agenda except to call the BNP racist. The BNP followed that up with a campaign called People Like Us.
 
I went to a talk by Mike when he’d just completed his initial research about the BNP victory and decline in Burnley . Then ; one of his main points was the successful ( and very selective) marketing by the BNP of the economic decline of Burnley especially traditional jobs , the impact of that and migration on community etc . This was coupled with some community activism , an economic programme which in some aspects was to the left of the Blairite Labour Party and a scathing anti Tory critique. His conclusion was that it was successful precisely because there was more than a grain of truth in it , that none of the local parties had a post industrial critique or plan ie business ( what was left of it ) as usual . An area , of which large parts of it might have been the assumed terrain of the left , succumbed to a poisonous far right ( not Conservative ) agenda with left having no answer, unable to promote any other agenda except to call the BNP racist. The BNP followed that up with a campaign called People Like Us.
Some elements of which did not go un-noticed by Vote Leave or it's subsequent government.
 
Perhaps, in a small way, this little discussion about wages and investment represents a microcosm of what Westen was quoted as writing in the John Harris, Guardian piece up thread:

1633955309418.png

It doesn't really matter what the stats show, it's the affective resonance of the belief that it was immigration that pegged wage rates and disincentivised investment that matters and, in part, drove the Leave vote.
 
Back
Top Bottom