ska invita
back on the other side
I know right? ... You just can't get the staff these days
UK employers struggle with worst labour shortage since 1997
- Thread starter Tooter
- Start date
krtek a houby
Sail hatin'
Fair enough but then it's still letting shits get away with deliberate fucking up threads.
Don't mind it elsewhere, you expect that but urban has a long and satisfying history of destroying these pricks.
That said, the thread topic is more important. Won't be replying to his nonsense on this thread. Apologies for the derail.
Someone’s been busy on aisle 822.33
David Clapson
Well-Known Member
Just move on. Threads can't be wrecked if you don't play the troll's game.
No need to “destroy” this “prick”. I’ve already suggested getting banned. Hasn’t happened yet, maybe have a word with your precious leader.
Does “troll” mean someone who challenges the loudest voices?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
This is another of those times when it'd have been better for you to keep quiet and be thought a fool than pipe up and prove yourself one. Again. It's not a quote from Shakespeare.
Last edited:
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
The only way you challenge loud voices is by the volume of your farts
editor
hiraethified
Time for you to leave the site if you carry on disruptive shite like this.
Final warning.
Final warning?
Mate, have you seen how obnoxious some of your oldest members are?
They bully, insult, lie, belittle, and manipulate.
So — respectfully — fuck you if you think I’m being disruptive. Does being disruptive mean disagreeing or challenging or pushing back or standing up or offering my opinion?
If I’ve acted out of order, please show me where and when.
Last edited:
I’m not sure honest Abe would spend his life on a forum passing other people’s quotes off as his own.
But to each their own.
The number was irrelevant, mate. I admire the fact you understood the reference though. Props.
two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
You've made most posts on this thread, which was actually including fair points until you joined. In response to:
You said:
Which starts with an insult and then goes off into this nonsense: "The most ambitious poor people become rich people" is one of the more stupid things I've seen on urban. What sort of replies do you expect?
You said:
Which starts with an insult and then goes off into this nonsense: "The most ambitious poor people become rich people" is one of the more stupid things I've seen on urban. What sort of replies do you expect?
existentialist
Things Done
With this riposte, I think you're done for.
I'd like to say it's been nice knowing you...only it hasn't. So don't let the door hit your arse too hard on the way out.
I dunno. Agreement?
Poor people who actively strive for wealth certainly have a better chance of achieving it than those who don’t.
And the idle rich generally stay rich regardless.
I don’t think that’s particularly controversial.
…and yet, somehow I’m still here, arse unslapped.
two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
That's not what you said though is it? "The most ambitious poor people become rich people".
If only those poor people would just be more ambitious they'd become rich. That's a fucking stupid thing to imply, and shows no understanding of how society works. You deserve all the stick you've had for that.
Puddy_Tat
naturally fluffy
I stand by what I said.
I’m not saying poor people deserve to be poor because they lack ambition.
I’m saying those poor people who drag themselves out of poverty do so because they have an unwavering ambition to escape their poverty despite their so-called societal limitations.
Which is fucking commendable.
Whilst at the same time, the rich stay rich regardless. Why are you arguing this?
Last edited:
krtek a houby
Sail hatin'
Ignore the lying cunt.
Bollocks. Goalposts moved off into the distance there. "The most ambitious poor people become rich people".
How many of those billions of people become rich? They're just not ambitious enough.
It’s not bollocks though, Mr. Sheds.
Like it or not, ambition is a real thing. But what people strive for is an individual choice.
Some people want a comfier settee, some people want a better job, some people want to be rich, and some people just want something to eat.
Not everyone wants the responsibility of a highly paid but highly stressful career.
Not everyone wants to be rich.
You’re the one moving the goalposts by supposing everyone wants what you want.
two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
yeh I think you're right.
If only those 2.8 billion people living on less than $2/day would be more ambitious they'd be millionaires by now
.I reported this post, for what it’s worth. I suppose your longevity and seniority will prevail.
The funny thing is, you all argue about the class system, but this forum is like your own little class microcosm where you get to call people cunts and ban people for not agreeing with you
Humberto
Take me up to Monto
Here we go. Boo hoo etc
Only if being wealthy is important to you
You called me a lying cunt. Show me my lies.
Actually you didn’t. Apologies. Krtek did.
Humberto
Take me up to Monto
Yes there are plenty of other options.
Humberto
Take me up to Monto
Show me the money!
- happy
- healthy
- optimistic
- loved
- pub
- friends nearby
- family to help
Fucking hell. All you people seem to despise the wealthy but desperately want to be them!
Similar threads
